Efficacy and safety of bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate with "button-type" electrode compared with transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia

被引:0
|
作者
ZHANG Shi-ying [1 ]
HU Hao [1 ]
ZHANG Xiao-peng [1 ]
WANG Dong [1 ]
XU Ke-xin [1 ]
NA Yan-qun [1 ]
HUANG Xiao-bo [1 ]
WANG Xiao-feng [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Urology,Peking University People’s Hospital
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R697.3 [];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background Transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) has been considered as the standard treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).However,issues that have not yet been overcome for TURP include bleeding and absorption of irrigation fluid.Thus,novel improvement of the surgery is necessary.This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate(BPVP) with "button-type" electrode against standard TURP for BPH. Methods From January 2009 to January 2012,30 patients who scheduled for surgical treatment of BPH surgical treatment were enrolled in the trial with provided consent for the study.Patients were prospectively randomized 1:1 to undergo either BPVP or TURP.Participants were blinded to the randomization scheme.All cases were assessed preoperatively and followed at 1,3,and 6 months postoperatively by indwelling catheter time,blood loss,hospital stays, International Prostate Symptom Score(IPSS),quality of life(QOL),and Qmax. Results BPVP was significantly superior to TURP in terms of indwelling catheter time((4.1±4.1) days vs.(6.8±6.8) days,P=0.000),blood loss((64.7±103.8) ml vs.(254.7±325.4) ml,P=0.040),hospital stay((8.7±1.0) days vs.(11.7H.5) days,P=0.000),IPSS((4.2±8.0) vs.(9.3±3.7),P=0.049),QOL((1.5±0.8) vs.(2.6±1.4),P=0.027),Qmax((16.3±5.7) ml/s vs.(12.5±3.1) ml/s,P=0.038),hemoglobin((130.7±9.4) g/L vs.((122.1±11.9) g/L,P=0.047),Na;level((138.6±2.1) mmol/L vs.((137.2±2.0) mmol/L,P=0.046) and operation time((39.0±15.5) minutes vs.((69.3±24.8) minutes,P=0.004). And there were no statistical differences between BPVP group and TURP group in preoperatively assessment:patient’s age((70.9±7.1) years vs.(71.9±6.1) years,P=0.736),IPSS((24.6±4.7) vs.(27.3±5.9),P=0.100),QOL((5.1±0.8) vs. (5.1±1.0),P=0.940),Qmax((4.4±2.7) ml/s vs.(5.3±2.6) ml/s,P=0.314),hemoglobin((137.4±8.7) g/L vs.(139.2±10.4) g/L,P=0.623),Na;level((140.5±1.8) mmol/L vs.(141.3±1.4) mmol/L,P=0.192) and prostate volume((59.0±17.4) ml vs. (70.1±28.8) ml,P=0.276). Conclusions Compared with TURP,BPVP with "button-type" electrode shows superior efficacy and safety.Therefore, BPVP with "button-type" electrode represents a valuable endoscopic treatment alternative for BPH patients.
引用
收藏
页码:3811 / 3814
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy and safety of bipolar plasma vaporization of the prostate with "button-type" electrode compared with transurethral resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Zhang Shi-ying
    Hu Hao
    Zhang Xiao-peng
    Wang Dong
    Xu Ke-xin
    Na Yan-qun
    Huang Xiao-bo
    Wang Xiao-feng
    [J]. CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 125 (21) : 3811 - 3814
  • [2] Transurethral Vapor Enucleation and Resection of the Prostate with Plasma Vaporization Button Electrode for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Feasibility Study
    Xie, Liping
    Mao, Qiqi
    Chen, Hong
    Qin, Jie
    Zheng, Xiangyi
    Lin, Yiwei
    Wang, Xiao
    Liu, Ben
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (10) : 1264 - 1266
  • [3] Transurethral enucleation of prostate with button electrode plasmakinetic vaporization for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Peng, Bo
    Huang, Jianhua
    Wang, Guangchun
    Zhang, Haimin
    Liu, Min
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [4] Transurethral enucleation of prostate with button electrode plasmakinetic vaporization for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Bo Peng
    Jianhua Huang
    Guangchun Wang
    Haimin Zhang
    Min Liu
    [J]. Scientific Reports, 6
  • [5] Transurethral Vapor Enucleation and Resection of the Prostate with Plasma Vaporization Button Electrode for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Feasibility Study Comment
    Michel, Maurice S.
    Krombach, Patrick
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2012, 26 (10) : 1267 - 1267
  • [6] Efficacy of bipolar "button" plasma vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction, compared to the standard technique
    Aboutaleb, Hamdy
    [J]. UROLOGY ANNALS, 2015, 7 (04) : 442 - 447
  • [7] Cost analysis of Greenlight photoselective vaporization of the prostate compared to transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia
    Masucci, Lisa
    Erman, Aysegul
    Krahn, Murray D.
    Elterman, Dean
    [J]. CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (12): : 382 - 387
  • [8] Efficacy and Safety of the Sandwich Method in Patients with Benign Prostate Hyperplasia: Bipolar Transurethral Resection with GreenLight Vaporization
    Lin, Tsu-Chen
    Chang, Po-Chih
    Shao, I-Hung
    Chen, Yu
    Huang, Hsin-Chieh
    Hsu, Yu-Chao
    Hsieh, Ming-Li
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (05)
  • [9] COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF GREENLIGHT PHOTOSELECTIVE VAPORIZATION OF THE PROSTATE COMPARED TO TRANSURETHRAL RESECTION OF THE PROSTATE FOR BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA
    Elterman, Dean
    Massuci, Lisa
    Erman, Aysegul
    Furman, Michelle
    Shepherd, Shaun
    Krahn, Murray
    [J]. NEUROUROLOGY AND URODYNAMICS, 2018, 37 : S661 - S661
  • [10] Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Conventional Transurethral Resection of the Prostate, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate in Saline (TURIS), and TURIS-Plasma Vaporization for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Pilot Study
    Lee, Yong Taec
    Ryu, Young Woo
    Lee, Dong Min
    Park, Sang Wook
    Yum, Seung Hee
    Han, June Hyun
    [J]. KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 52 (11) : 763 - 768