Data-Driven Model Falsification and Uncertainty Quantification for Fractured Reservoirs

被引:1
|
作者
Junling Fang [1 ,2 ]
Bin Gong [1 ,2 ]
Jef Caers [3 ]
机构
[1] School of Earth Resources, China University of Geosciences
[2] Key Laboratory of Tectonics and Petroleum Resources of the Ministry of Education
[3] Department of Geological Sciences, Stanford University
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE319 [模拟理论与计算机技术在开发中的应用];
学科分类号
082002 ;
摘要
Many properties of natural fractures are uncertain,such as their spatial distribution,petrophysical properties,and fluid flow performance.Bayesian theorem provides a framework to quantify the uncertainty in geological modeling and flow simulation,and hence to support reservoir performance predictions.The application of Bayesian methods to fractured reservoirs has mostly been limited to synthetic cases.In field applications,however,one of the main problems is that the Bayesian prior is falsified,because it fails to predict past reservoir production data.In this paper,we show how a global sensitivity analysis(GSA)can be used to identify why the prior is falsified.We then employ an approximate Bayesian computation(ABC) method combined with a tree-based surrogate model to match the production history.We apply these two approaches to a complex fractured oil and gas reservoir where all uncertainties are jointly considered,including the petrophysical properties,rock physics properties,fluid properties,discrete fracture parameters,and dynamics of pressure and transmissibility.We successfully identify several reasons for the falsification.The results show that the methods we propose are effective in quantifying uncertainty in the modeling and flow simulation of a fractured reservoir.The uncertainties of key parameters,such as fracture aperture and fault conductivity,are reduced.
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 128
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Data-Driven Model Falsification and Uncertainty Quantification for Fractured Reservoirs
    Fang, Junling
    Gong, Bin
    Caers, Jef
    [J]. ENGINEERING, 2022, 18 : 116 - 128
  • [2] Derivation and Uncertainty Quantification of a Data-Driven Subcooled Boiling Model
    Soibam, Jerol
    Rabhi, Achref
    Aslanidou, Ioanna
    Kyprianidis, Konstantinos
    Bel Fdhila, Rebei
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (22)
  • [3] Behavioral uncertainty quantification for data-driven control
    Padoan, Alberto
    Coulson, Jeremy
    van Waarde, Henk J.
    Lygeros, John
    Dorfler, Florian
    [J]. 2022 IEEE 61ST CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2022, : 4726 - 4731
  • [4] FAST AND FLEXIBLE UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION THROUGH A DATA-DRIVEN SURROGATE MODEL
    Dietrich, Felix
    Kuenzner, Florian
    Neckel, Tobias
    Koester, Gerta
    Bungartz, Hans-Joachim
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2018, 8 (02) : 175 - 192
  • [5] Uncertainty quantification in data-driven stochastic subspace identification
    Reynders, Edwin P.B.
    [J]. 2021, Academic Press (151)
  • [6] Bayesian uncertainty quantification for data-driven equation learning
    Martina-Perez, Simon
    Simpson, Matthew J.
    Baker, Ruth E.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2021, 477 (2254):
  • [7] A data-driven framework for uncertainty quantification of a fluidized bed
    Kotteda, V. M. Krushnarao
    Kommu, Anitha
    Kumar, Vinod
    [J]. 2019 IEEE HIGH PERFORMANCE EXTREME COMPUTING CONFERENCE (HPEC), 2019,
  • [8] Uncertainty quantification in data-driven stochastic subspace identification
    Reynders, Edwin P. B.
    [J]. MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2021, 151
  • [9] Evaluation of physics constrained data-driven methods for turbulence model uncertainty quantification
    Matha, Marcel
    Kucharczyk, Karsten
    Morsbach, Christian
    [J]. COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2023, 255
  • [10] Hybrid Model-Based and Data-Driven Solution for Uncertainty Quantification at the Microscale
    Quesada-Molina J.P.
    Mariani S.
    [J]. Micro and Nanosystems, 2022, 14 (04) : 281 - 286