FUZZY PREFERENCES IN CONFLICTS

被引:0
|
作者
Mubarak S.AL-MUTAIRI [1 ]
Keith W.HIPEL [2 ]
Mohamed S.KAMEL [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Computer Science and Engineering,Hafr Albatin Community College,King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals,Hafr Albatin,Saudi Arabia
[2] Department of Systems Design Engineering,University of Waterloo,Waterloo,Ontario,Canada
[3] Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering,University of Waterloo,Waterloo,Ontario,Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Environmental conflict; fuzzy sets; Graph Model for Conflict Resolution; preferences; multiple participants;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
O159 [模糊数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
A systematic fuzzy approach is developed to model fuzziness and uncertainties in the preferences of decision makers involved in a conflict.This unique fuzzy preference formulation is used within the paradigm of the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution in which a given dispute is modeled in terms of decision makers,each decision maker’s courses of actions or options,and each decision maker’s preferences concerning the states or outcomes which could take place.In order to be able to determine the stability of each state for each decision maker and the possible equilibria or resolutions,a range of solution concepts describing potential human behavior under conflict are defined for use with fuzzy preferences.More specifically,strong and weak definitions of stability are provided for the solution concepts called Nash,general metarational,symmetric metarational,and sequential stability.To illustrate how these solution concepts can be conveniently used in practice,they are applied to a dispute over the contamination of an aquifer by a chemical company located in Elmira,Ontario, Canada.
引用
收藏
页码:257 / 276
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Fuzzy preferences in conflicts
    Al-Mutairi, Mubarak S.
    Hipel, Keith W.
    Kamel, Mohamed S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2008, 17 (03) : 257 - 276
  • [2] Fuzzy preferences in conflicts
    Mubarak S. Al-Mutairi
    Keith W. Hipel
    Mohamed S. Kamel
    [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 2008, 17 : 257 - 276
  • [3] Landscape conflicts: preferences, identities and rights
    John O'Neill
    Mary Walsh
    [J]. Landscape Ecology, 2000, 15 : 281 - 289
  • [4] Landscape conflicts: preferences, identities and rights
    O'Neill, J
    Walsh, M
    [J]. LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2000, 15 (03) : 281 - 289
  • [5] Transitivity and fuzzy preferences
    Dasgupta, M
    Deb, R
    [J]. SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 1996, 13 (03) : 305 - 318
  • [6] Acyclicity of fuzzy preferences
    Dasgupta, M
    Deb, R
    [J]. CURRENT TRENDS IN ECONOMICS: THEORY AND APPLICATIONS, 1999, 8 : 133 - 140
  • [7] Factorization of fuzzy preferences
    Bonifacio Llamazares
    [J]. Social Choice and Welfare, 2005, 24 : 475 - 496
  • [8] Factorization of fuzzy preferences
    Llamazares, B
    [J]. SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2005, 24 (03) : 475 - 496
  • [9] Coalitional fuzzy preferences
    Mares, M
    [J]. KYBERNETIKA, 2002, 38 (03) : 339 - 352
  • [10] Inheritance conflicts: Kinship, contributions and allocation preferences
    Bossong, B
    Nussbeck, F
    [J]. ZEITSCHRIFT FUR SOZIALPSYCHOLOGIE, 2004, 35 (03): : 143 - 156