Study on the Deconvolution Method and Processing Flow of Airgun Source Data

被引:0
|
作者
Zhai Qiushi [1 ]
Yao Huajian [1 ,2 ]
Wang Baoshan [3 ]
机构
[1] School of Earth and Space Sciences,University of Science and Technology of China
[2] Mengcheng National Geophysical Observatory
[3] Key Laboratory of Seismic Observation and Geophysical Imaging,Institute of Geophysics,CEA
关键词
Artificial source; Airgun source; Deconvolution; Data processing flow;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P631.4 [地震勘探];
学科分类号
0818 ; 081801 ; 081802 ;
摘要
With its high repeatability,the airgun source has been used to monitor the temporal variations of subsurface structures. However,under different working conditions,there will be subtle differences in the airgun source signals. To some extent,deconvolution can eliminate changes of the recorded signals due to source variations. Generally speaking,in order to remove the airgun source wavelet signal and obtain the Green’s functions between the airgun source and stations,we need to select an appropriate method to perform the deconvolution process for seismic waveform data. Frequency domain water level deconvolution and time domain iterative deconvolution are two kinds of deconvolution methods widely used in the field of receiver functions,etc. We use the Binchuan( in Yunnan Province,China) airgun data as an example to compare the performance of these two deconvolution methods in airgun source data processing. The results indicate that frequency domain water level deconvolution is better in terms of computational efficiency;time domain iterative deconvolution is better in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio( SNR),and the initial motion of P-wave is also clearer. We further discuss the sequence issue of deconvolution and stack for multiple-shot airgun data processing. Finally,we propose a general processing flow for the airgun source data to extract the Green ’s functions between the airgun source and stations.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 404
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study on the Deconvolution Method and Processing Flow of Airgun Source Data
    Zhai Qiushi
    Yao Huajian
    Wang Baoshan
    [J]. Earthquake Research in China., 2016, 30 (03) - 404
  • [2] Analysis of the Frequency Domain Water-level Deconvolution Method Based on Reservoir Airgun Source Data
    You Xiuzhen
    Li Jun
    Lin Binhua
    Huang YANDan
    Wu Lihua
    Guo Yang
    [J]. Earthquake Research Advances, 2018, (03) : 355 - 366
  • [3] Probability Data Screening Method in Airgun Signal Processing Application
    LI Jun
    YOU Xiuzhen
    HU Shufang
    [J]. Earthquake Research Advances, 2019, (02) : 235 - 247
  • [4] A DECONVOLUTION METHOD FOR IMPLOSIVE-SOURCE TYPE DATA
    EVANS, T
    MARSCHALL, R
    SCHILDT, P
    [J]. GEOPHYSICS, 1985, 50 (02) : 328 - 328
  • [5] Alternative Applications of the Method of Moments: from Electromagnetic Waves to Source Synthesis, Deconvolution, and Data Processing in Navigation Systems
    Tamas, Razvan D.
    Dumitrascu, Ana
    Caruntu, George
    [J]. ADVANCED TOPICS IN OPTOELECTRONICS, MICROELECTRONICS, AND NANOTECHNOLOGIES VII, 2015, 9258
  • [6] DIGITAL PROCESSING OF ULTRASONIC DATA BY DECONVOLUTION
    HUNDT, E
    TRAUTENBERG, E
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SONICS AND ULTRASONICS, 1980, 27 (03): : 147 - 147
  • [7] DIGITAL PROCESSING OF ULTRASONIC DATA BY DECONVOLUTION
    HUNDT, EE
    TRAUTENBERG, EA
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SONICS AND ULTRASONICS, 1980, 27 (05): : 249 - 252
  • [8] Vibration Signal Processing by Deconvolution Method
    Marian, Popescu Ion
    Adrian, Runceanu
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS IN NETWORKING, EDUCATION AND AUTOMATION, 2010, : 393 - 398
  • [9] Study on the Source Characteristics of Downhole Airgun with Different Excitation Environments
    Yang Wei
    Wang Baoshan
    Liu Zhengyi
    Yang Jun
    Li Xiaobin
    Chen Yong
    [J]. Earthquake Research Advances, 2016, (03) : 342 - 354
  • [10] Study on the Source Characteristics of Downhole Airgun with Different Excitation Environments
    Yang Wei
    Wang Baoshan
    Liu Zhengyi
    Yang Jun
    Li Xiaobin
    Chen Yong
    [J]. Earthquake Research in China., 2016, 30 (03) - 354