An analysis of interplanetary sources of geomagnetic storm during November 7-8, 1998

被引:0
|
作者
LE GuiMing1
2 National Center for Space Weather
3 Key Laboratory of Radiometric Calibration and Validation for Environmental Satellites
4 North China Electric Power University
5 Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
机构
基金
国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划); 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
geomagnetic storm; magnetic cloud; interplanetary shock; sheath; south component of interplanetary magnetic field;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P318.22 [];
学科分类号
070801 ;
摘要
We analyzed the properties of the solar wind appeared during November 7–8, 1998. Results show that the spaceship ACE spotted a shock (hereinafter referred to as the first shock) at 07:33 UT, November 7. The sheath appeared from the first shock to 22:00 UT November 7. A magnetic cloud-like (MCL) was observed during the period from 22:00 UT November 7 to 11:50 UT, November 8. Another shock was observed at 04:19 UT, November 8 (the second shock). It is apparent that the second shock has entered the rear part of the MCL (MCL), though the former part of the MCL (MCL) was not affected by the second shock. The main phase of the geomagnetic storm is split into three steps for the convenience of SYM-H index analysis. Step 1 covers the period from the sudden storm commence (SSC) at 08:15 UT, November 7 to the moment of 22:44 UT, November 7. Step 2 starts from 22:44 UT, November 7 and ends at 04:51 UT, November 8. The last step runs from 04:51 UT, November 8 to 06:21 UT, November 8. Step 2 has played a key role in the main development phase of the geomagnetic storm. Analysis of the solar wind properties associated with the main phase shows that the three steps in the main phase have sheath, MCL, and MCLas their respective interplanetary source. Specifically, the sheath is covered by the solar wind data from 07:33 UT to 22:00 UT, November 7, MCL1 by the solar wind data from 22:00 UT, November 7 to 04:19 UT November 8, and MCLby the solar wind data from 04:19 UT to 05:57 UT, November 8. MCLhad a strong and long lasting so UTh directed magnetic field, allowing it to play a key role in the development of the main phase. MCLmade a much smaller contribution to the main development phase, compared with MCL.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 858
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An analysis of interplanetary sources of geomagnetic storm during November 7-8, 1998
    Le GuiMing
    Tang YuHua
    Zheng Liang
    Liu LianGuang
    [J]. CHINESE SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2010, 55 (09): : 851 - 856
  • [2] Topside Ionospheric Conditions During the 7-8 September 2017 Geomagnetic Storm
    Jimoh, Oluwaseyi
    Lei, Jiuhou
    Zhong, Jiahao
    Owolabi, Charles
    Luan, Xiaoli
    Dou, Xiankang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2019, 124 (11) : 9381 - 9404
  • [3] The GIC and Geomagnetic Response Over Fennoscandia to the 7-8 September 2017 Geomagnetic Storm
    Dimmock, A. P.
    Rosenqvist, L.
    Hall, J-O
    Viljanen, A.
    Yordanova, E.
    Honkonen, I
    Andre, M.
    Sjoberg, E. C.
    [J]. SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 17 (07): : 989 - 1010
  • [4] Response of the ETA ionosphere to the 7-8 May 2005 geomagnetic storm
    Aggarwal, Malini
    Joshi, H. P.
    Iyer, K. N.
    Kwak, Y. S.
    [J]. ADVANCES IN SPACE RESEARCH, 2013, 52 (04) : 591 - 603
  • [5] Global investigation of the ionospheric irregularities during the severe geomagnetic storm on September 7-8, 2017
    Atici, Ramazan
    Sagir, Selcuk
    [J]. GEODESY AND GEODYNAMICS, 2020, 11 (03) : 211 - 221
  • [6] Global investigation of the ionospheric irregularities during the severe geomagnetic storm on September 7-8, 2017
    Ramazan Atici
    Selcuk Sair
    [J]. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2020, 11 (03) : 211 - 221
  • [7] Global investigation of the ionospheric irregularities during the severe geomagnetic storm on September 7-8, 2017
    Ramazan Atici
    Selcuk Sa?ir
    [J]. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2020, (03) : 211 - 221
  • [8] Unusual spatial-temporal dynamics of geomagnetic disturbances during the main phase of the extremely strong magnetic storm of November 7-8, 2004
    Kozyreva, O. V.
    Kleimenova, N. G.
    Kornilova, T. A.
    Kauriste, K.
    Manninen, J.
    Ranta, A.
    [J]. GEOMAGNETISM AND AERONOMY, 2006, 46 (05) : 580 - 592
  • [9] Comprehensive analysis of the flux dropout during 7-8 November 2008 storm using multisatellite observations and RBE model
    Hwang, J.
    Choi, E. -J.
    Park, J. -S.
    Fok, M. -C.
    Lee, D. -Y.
    Kim, K. -C.
    Shin, D. -K.
    Usanova, M. E.
    Reeves, G. D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2015, 120 (06) : 4298 - 4312
  • [10] The effects of particle injections on the ring current development during the 7-8 September 2017 geomagnetic storm
    Ferradas, C. P.
    Fok, M. -C.
    Maruyama, N.
    Henderson, M. G.
    Califf, S.
    Thaller, S. A.
    Kress, B. T.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ASTRONOMY AND SPACE SCIENCES, 2023, 10