Methods Comparison for Microsatellite Marker Development:Different Isolation Methods,Different Yield Efficiency

被引:0
|
作者
ZHAN Aibin
机构
关键词
microsatellite; marker development; isolation efficiency; method comparison; scallop;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S917.4 [水产动物学];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Microsatellite markers have become one kind of the most important molecular tools used in various researches. A large number of microsatellite markers are required for the whole genome survey in the fields of molecular ecology,quantitative genetics and genomics. Therefore,it is extremely necessary to select several versatile,low-cost,efficient and time-and labor-saving methods to develop a large panel of microsatellite markers. In this study,we used Zhikong scallop(Chlamys farreri) as the target species to compare the efficiency of the five methods derived from three strategies for microsatellite marker development. The results showed that the strategy of constructing small insert genomic DNA library resulted in poor efficiency,while the microsatellite-enriched strategy highly improved the isolation efficiency. Although the mining public database strategy is time-and cost-saving,it is difficult to obtain a large number of microsatellite markers,mainly due to the limited sequence data of non-model species deposited in public databases. Based on the results in this study,we recommend two methods,microsatellite-enriched library construction method and FIASCO-colony hybridization method,for large-scale microsatellite marker development. Both methods were derived from the microsatellite-enriched strategy. The experimental results obtained from Zhikong scallop also provide the reference for microsatellite marker development in other species with large genomes.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 165
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Methods comparison for microsatellite marker development: Different isolation methods, different yield efficiency
    Zhan A.
    Bao Z.
    Hu X.
    Lu W.
    Hu J.
    [J]. Journal of Ocean University of China, 2009, 8 (2) : 161 - 165
  • [2] The comparison of different irrigation methods on yield and water use efficiency of the jujube
    Wang, Cheng
    Bai, Dan
    Li, Yibo
    Yao, Baolin
    Feng, Yaqin
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2021, 252
  • [3] Comparison of different methods for the isolation of tick DNA
    Kriegelstein, S.
    Fingerle, V.
    Boelhauve, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 301 : 3 - 3
  • [4] Comparison of three different mycobacterial DNA isolation methods
    Alp, Alpaslan
    Alp, Sehnaz
    Saribas, Zeynep
    Hascelik, Guelsen
    [J]. MIKROBIYOLOJI BULTENI, 2007, 41 (03): : 395 - 402
  • [5] Comparison of insect detection efficiency by different detection methods
    Jian, Fuji
    Doak, Sara
    Jayas, Digvir S.
    Fields, Paul G.
    White, Noel D. G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STORED PRODUCTS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 : 138 - 142
  • [6] Soybean breeding: comparison of the efficiency of different selection methods
    Miladinovic, Jegor
    Burton, Joe W.
    Tubic, Svetlana Balesevic
    Miladinovic, Dragana
    Djordjevic, Vuk
    Djukic, Vojin
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY, 2011, 35 (05) : 469 - 480
  • [7] Comparison of different planting methods in relation to grain yield of wheat
    Novoselovic, D.
    Drezner, G.
    Lalic, A.
    Grljusic, S.
    Gunjaca, J.
    [J]. CEREAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2007, 35 (01) : 141 - 149
  • [8] Comparison of Different Planting Methods in Relation to Grain Yield of Wheat
    D. Novoselović
    G. Drezner
    A. Lalić
    S. Grljušić
    J. Gunjača
    [J]. Cereal Research Communications, 2007, 35 : 141 - 149
  • [9] Comparison of three different methods to model the semiconductor manufacturing yield
    Dupret, Y
    Perrin, E
    Grolier, JL
    Kielbasa, R
    [J]. 2005 IEEE/SEMI ADVANCED SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOP: ADVANCING SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING EXCELLENCE, 2005, : 119 - 124
  • [10] Comparison of the Photosynthetic Yield of Cyanobacteria and Green Algae: Different Methods Give Different Answers
    Schuurmans, R. Milou
    van Alphen, Pascal
    Schuurmans, J. Merijn
    Matthijs, Hans C. P.
    Hellingwerf, Klaas J.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (09):