Education for Sustainability:Lessons from Living Systems Governance

被引:0
|
作者
Pierre BRICAGE
机构
[1] AFSCET, the French Society for Systems and Cybernetic Sciences, ENSAM
[2] IASCYS,the International Academy for Systems and Cybernetic Sciences, IRSEEM, ESIGELEC, technop?le du Madrillet
关键词
ARMSADA; fractal law; gauge invariance; governance; sustainability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
To survive that is to eat and not to be eaten. Whatever its spatial and temporal level of organisation, every living system owns 7 invariant capacities(the gauge invariance paradigm). Emerging by embedments and juxtapositions of previous systems, every living system-of-systems is both dependent and independent from its new global level of organisation and past and present local situations of emergence. Mass growth governs growth phase duration. Local actors, modules of past, present and new modules of modules become mutually integrated(percolation process) into a new Whole through their merging into an ARMSADA(Association for the Reciprocal and Mutual Sharing of Advantages and DisAdvantages). Reversely(systemic constructal law) the global Whole is integrating the local parceners. Whatever the organisation level, the living systems obey the same principle of evolution and emergence, the volume and time of generation of the adult system obey a correlation: The mass controlled duration of acquisition of the reproductive capacity and the volume at its acquisition are linked by a 3/2 exponent power law. This dynamic fractal law is invariant, between and within levels of organisation. Brownian motion is the basic phenomenon of growth control: Matter and energy are exchanged at a constant flow rate. A Pareto-like relationship governs limits and limitations: Mutual survival depends on reciprocal limitations, through interactive feedbacks, for the best and for the worst. To survive that is to transform disadvantages into advantages and to avoid advantages turn to disadvantages.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 226
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] One Planet Living and the legitimacy of sustainability governance: From standardised information to regenerative systems
    Gerhards, Jan
    Greenwood, Dan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 313
  • [2] Governance of Governance in Higher Education: Practices and lessons drawn from the Portuguese case
    Magalhaes, Antonio
    Veiga, Amelia
    Amaral, Alberto
    Sousa, Sofia
    Ribeiro, Filipa
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION QUARTERLY, 2013, 67 (03) : 295 - 311
  • [3] Further education in the UK: lessons from the governance of colleges in Scotland
    Watson, Cate
    Husband, Gary Andrew
    Young, Helen Louise
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND WORK, 2020, 33 (02) : 129 - 142
  • [4] Certification systems for machine learning: Lessons from sustainability
    Matus, Kira J. M.
    Veale, Michael
    [J]. REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2022, 16 (01) : 177 - 196
  • [5] THE SUSTAINABILITY OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION: LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE
    Damaj, Issam
    Kranov, Ashley Ater
    [J]. INTED2014: 8TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2014, : 5825 - 5835
  • [6] Feminist urban living labs and social sustainability: lessons from Sweden
    Caroline Wrangsten
    Sara Ferlander
    Sara Borgström
    [J]. Urban Transformations, 4 (1):
  • [7] Sustainability Education in China: Lessons Learnt from the Teaching of Geography
    Huang, Haoyi
    Cheng, Eddie W. L.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [8] LESSONS FROM THE JUNK DRAWER: POSSIBILITIES FOR SUSTAINABILITY IN ART EDUCATION
    Stendel, Jackie
    [J]. MCGILL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2022, 57 (02): : 235 - 240
  • [9] Evaluating sustainability education: lessons from international development experience
    Koehn, Peter H.
    Uitto, Juha I.
    [J]. HIGHER EDUCATION, 2014, 67 (05) : 621 - 635
  • [10] Evaluating sustainability education: lessons from international development experience
    Peter H. Koehn
    Juha I. Uitto
    [J]. Higher Education, 2014, 67 : 621 - 635