On the spring stratospheric final warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models

被引:0
|
作者
Jinggao HU [1 ]
Zexuan LIU [1 ]
Haiming XU [1 ]
Rongcai REN [1 ,2 ]
Dachao JIN [1 ]
机构
[1] Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster,Ministry of Education (KLME),Joint International Research Laboratory of Climate and Environment Change (ILCEC),Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD),Nanji
[2] State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics (LASG),Institute of Atmospheric Physics,Chinese Academy of Sciences
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
P467 [气候变化、历史气候];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This study evaluates the performance in simulating the stratospheric final warming events(SFWs) that lead to the final collapse of the stratospheric polar vortex in spring in both Southern and Northern Hemispheres(SH and NH,respectively)based on the historical simulations provided by the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phases 5 and 6(CMIP5 and CMIP6,respectively).Overall,CMIP5 and CMIP6 models can reproduce the main characteristics of the occurrence of SFWs.However,the SFW onset date(SFWOD) is 7 and 9 days later than in observations in the SH and NH,respectively.Moreover,the intensity of SFWs in models is 50% to 70% of that in observations.Compared with CMIP5 models,CMIP6 models have an ameliorated capability to simulate NH SFWs.However,this improvement does not manifest as significantly earlier SFW onset,but as more intense stratospheric planetary wave activities before the SFWand as a larger interannual variability of the SFWOD.By contrast,in the SH,the capability of CMIP6 models is roughly unchanged,even deteriorated in the simulation of SFWOD and stratospheric planetary wave activities before the SFW onset.The performance of CMIP6 high-top models is better than that of lowtop models.Specifically,in the NH,high-top models are considerably improved in terms of intensity of circumpolar zonal wind around the SFWOD and stratospheric planetary wave activities before the SFW onset.In the SH,high-top models show fairly earlier SFWOD by 11 days,which is closer to observations.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 145
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the spring stratospheric final warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Hu, Jinggao
    Liu, Zexuan
    Xu, Haiming
    Ren, Rongcai
    Jin, Dachao
    SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2023, 66 (01) : 129 - 145
  • [2] On the spring stratospheric final warming in CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Jinggao Hu
    Zexuan Liu
    Haiming Xu
    Rongcai Ren
    Dachao Jin
    Science China Earth Sciences, 2023, 66 : 129 - 145
  • [3] Comparison of Indian Ocean warming simulated by CMIP5 and CMIP6 models
    Li Jingyi
    Su Jingzhi
    ATMOSPHERIC AND OCEANIC SCIENCE LETTERS, 2020, 13 (06) : 604 - 611
  • [4] Warming Patterns Affect El Nino Diversity in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Freund, Mandy B.
    Brown, Josephine R.
    Henley, Benjamin J.
    Karoly, David J.
    Brown, Jaclyn N.
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2020, 33 (19) : 8237 - 8260
  • [5] Contributions to Polar Amplification in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Hahn, L. C.
    Armour, K. C.
    Zelinka, M. D.
    Bitz, C. M.
    Donohoe, A.
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [6] Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate extremes
    Chen, Huopo
    Sun, Jianqi
    Lin, Wenqing
    Xu, Huiwen
    SCIENCE BULLETIN, 2020, 65 (17) : 1415 - 1418
  • [7] Decomposing Temperature Extremes Errors in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Di Luca, Alejandro
    Pitman, Andrew J.
    de Elia, Ramon
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (14)
  • [8] Variations in the Frequency of Stratospheric Sudden Warmings in CMIP5 and CMIP6 and Possible Causes
    Wu, Zheng
    Reichler, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2020, 33 (23) : 10305 - 10320
  • [9] Hydrological Projections under CMIP5 and CMIP6
    Wu, Yi
    Miao, Chiyuan
    Slater, Louise
    Fan, Xuewei
    Chai, Yuanfang
    Sorooshian, Soroosh
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 105 (01) : E2374 - E2389
  • [10] CMIP5 SCIENTIFIC GAPS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CMIP6
    Stouffer, R. J.
    Eyring, V.
    Meehl, G. A.
    Bony, S.
    Senior, C.
    Stevens, B.
    Taylor, K. E.
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2017, 98 (01) : 95 - +