Avian introgression in the genomic era

被引:0
|
作者
Jente Ottenburghs [1 ]
Robert H.S.kraus [2 ,3 ]
Pim Van Hooft [1 ]
Sipke E.van Wieren [1 ]
Ronald C.Ydenberg [1 ,4 ]
Herbert H.T.Prins [1 ]
机构
[1] resource Ecology Group,Wageningen University
[2] Department of Biology,University of Konstanz
[3] Department of Migration and Immuno-Ecology,Max Planck Institute for Ornithology
[4] Centre of Wildlife Ecology,Simon Fraser University
关键词
Admixture; Cline theory; D-statictic; Genomic landscape; Hybridization; Phylogenetic discordance;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q953 [动物遗传学];
学科分类号
071007 ; 090501 ;
摘要
Introgression,the incorporation of genetic material from one(sub)species into the gene pool of another by means of hybridization and backcrossing,is a common phenomenon in birds and can provide important insights into the speciation process.In the last decade,the toolkit for studying introgression has expanded together with the development of molecular markers.In this review,we explore how genomic data,the most recent step in this methodological progress,impacts different aspects in the study of avian introgression.First,the detection of hybrids and backcrosses has improved dramatically.The most widely used software package is STRUCTURE.Phylogenetic discordance(i.e.different loci resulting in discordant gene trees) is another means for the detection of introgression,although it should be regarded as a starting point for further analyses,not as a definitive proof of introgression.Specifically,disentangling introgression from other biological processes,such as incomplete lineage sorting,remains a challenging endeavour,although new techniques,such as the D-statistic,are being developed.In addition,phylogenetics might require a shift from trees to networks.Second,the study of hybrid zones by means of geographical or genomic cline analysis has led to important insights into the complex interplay between hybridization and speciation.However,because each hybrid zone study is just a single snapshot of a complex and continuously changing interaction,hybrid zones should be studied across different temporal and/or spatial scales.A third powerful tool is the genome scan.The debate on which evolutionary processes underlie the genomic landscape is still ongoing,as is the question whether loci involved in reproductive isolation cluster together in ‘islands of speciation’ or whether they are scattered throughout the genome.Exploring genomic landscapes across the avian tree of life will be an exciting field for further research.Finally,the findings from these different methods should be incorporated into specific speciation scenarios,which can consequently be tested using a modelling approach.All in all,this genomic perspective on avian hybridization and speciation will further our understanding in evolution in general.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 191
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Avian introgression in the genomic era
    Ottenburghs, Jente
    Kraus, Robert H. S.
    van Hooft, Pim
    van Wieren, Sipke E.
    Ydenberg, Ronald C.
    Prins, Herbert H. T.
    [J]. AVIAN RESEARCH, 2017, 8
  • [2] GENOMIC AND MORPHOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF A SEMIPERMEABLE AVIAN HYBRID ZONE SUGGESTS ASYMMETRICAL INTROGRESSION OF A SEXUAL SIGNAL
    Baldassarre, Daniel T.
    White, Thomas A.
    Karubian, Jordan
    Webster, Michael S.
    [J]. EVOLUTION, 2014, 68 (09) : 2644 - 2657
  • [3] The dynamics of introgression across an avian radiation
    Singhal, Sonal
    Derryberry, Graham E.
    Bravo, Gustavo A.
    Derryberry, Elizabeth P.
    Brumfield, Robb T.
    Harvey, Michael G.
    [J]. EVOLUTION LETTERS, 2021, 5 (06) : 568 - 581
  • [4] Interpreting the genomic landscape of introgression
    Martin, Simon H.
    Jiggins, Chris D.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 47 : 69 - 74
  • [5] A genomic view of introgression and hybrid speciation
    Baack, Eric J.
    Rieseberg, Loren H.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT, 2007, 17 (06) : 513 - 518
  • [6] VolcanoFinder: Genomic scans for adaptive introgression
    Setter, Derek
    Mousset, Sylvain
    Cheng, Xiaoheng
    Nielsen, Rasmus
    DeGiorgio, Michael
    Hermisson, Joachim
    [J]. PLOS GENETICS, 2020, 16 (06):
  • [7] Genomic islands of divergence or opportunities for introgression?
    Bay, Rachael A.
    Ruegg, Kristen
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2017, 284 (1850)
  • [8] An Integrative Approach to Genomic Introgression Mapping
    Severin, Andrew J.
    Peiffer, Gregory A.
    Xu, Wayne W.
    Hyten, David L.
    Bucciarelli, Bruna
    O'Rourke, Jamie A.
    Bolon, Yung-Tsi
    Grant, David
    Farmer, Andrew D.
    May, Gregory D.
    Vance, Carroll P.
    Shoemaker, Randy C.
    Stupar, Robert M.
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2010, 154 (01) : 3 - 12
  • [9] Genomic architecture and introgression shape a butterfly radiation
    Edelman, Nathaniel B.
    Frandsen, Paul B.
    Miyagi, Michael
    Clavijo, Bernardo
    Davey, John
    Dikow, Rebecca B.
    Garcia-Accinelli, Gonzalo
    Van Belleghem, Steven M.
    Patterson, Nick
    Neafsey, Daniel E.
    Challis, Richard
    Kumar, Sujai
    Moreira, Gilson R. P.
    Salazar, Camilo
    Chouteau, Mathieu
    Counterman, Brian A.
    Papa, Riccardo
    Blaxter, Mark
    Reed, Robert D.
    Dasmahapatra, Kanchon K.
    Kronforst, Marcus
    Joron, Mathieu
    Jiggins, Chris D.
    McMillan, W. Owen
    Di Palma, Federica
    Blumberg, Andrew J.
    Wakeley, John
    Jaffe, David
    Mallet, James
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2019, 366 (6465) : 594 - +
  • [10] Genomic contributions in livestock gene introgression programmes
    Eileen Wall
    Peter M Visscher
    Frédéric Hospital
    John A Woolliams
    [J]. Genetics Selection Evolution, 37 (4)