Soft and Hard Tissue Changes Following Treatment of Class Ⅱ Division 1 Malocclusion with Twin-Block and Myofunctional Appliance: A Pilot Study

被引:0
|
作者
Ling XIE [1 ]
Ping WANG [1 ]
Jianhua WU [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Western District of Hefei Stomatological Hospital, Anhui Medical University
[2] Department of Orthodontics, Hefei Stomatological Hospital, Anhui Medical University
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R783.5 [口腔正畸学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Many cases of Class Ⅱ deformities have been reported to be treated with prefabricated appliances. The aim of this study was to distinguish the clinical effect of traditional custom-made appliances and prefabricated appliances in the treatment of Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion. Therefore, soft and hard tissue changes following treatment of Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion using the twin-block(TB) appliance was compared to that using the Myofunctional Research Company(MRC) appliance(K1 + K2) combined with oral myofunctional treatment(OMT)(MRC + OMT). Methods The study included 22 children(6 boys and 16 girls aged 9–11 years) with Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion along with mandibular retrognathism with a 5–12 mm overjet, basic normal maxillary status, and stage 2 or 3 cervical vertebral maturation(CVM). Participants were randomly assigned into two groups, the TB group and the MRC + OMT group for 12 months. Standardized lateral cephalograms were used to assess skeletal, dental, and soft tissue changes from pre-to post-treatment. Independent t-tests were used to compare the initial and final cephalometric status and tissue changes between the groups. Results The TB and MRC + OMT groups resulted in different degrees of lateral changes; however, improvements of skeletal and soft tissue indices were significantly greater in the TB group than in the MRC + OMT group. Conclusion TB was more effective than MRC + OMT in treating children aged 9–11 years with Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion. However, further research using custom-made appliances with OMT is recommended, and further investigations are needed to confirm these findings.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 227
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Early treatment with the twin-block appliance is effective in reducing overjet and severity of malocclusion: Is the twin-block orthodontic appliance effective in early treatment of developing class II division 1 malocclusion?
    Kalha A.
    Evidence-Based Dentistry, 2004, 5 (4) : 102 - 103
  • [2] Cephalometric facial soft tissue changes with the twin block appliance in class II division 1 malocclusion patients
    Flores-Mir, Carlos
    Major, Paul W.
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2006, 76 (05) : 876 - 881
  • [3] Treatment of Skeletal Class II Division 1 Using Twin Block Myofunctional Appliance
    Kalbande, Bhakti
    V. Jadhav, Vikrant
    Reche, Amit
    Nerurkar, Sumukh
    Ghulaxe, Yash
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (10)
  • [4] Cephalometric evaluation of the Twin-block appliance in the treatment of Class II Division 1 malocclusion with matched normative growth data
    Trenouth, MJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2000, 117 (01) : 54 - 59
  • [5] Early treatment for Class II Division 1 malocclusion with the Twin-block appliance: A multi-center, randomized, controlled trial
    O'Brien, Kevin
    Wright, Jean
    Conboy, Frances
    Appelbe, Priscilla
    Davies, Linda
    Connolly, Ivan
    Mitchell, Laura
    Littlewood, Simon
    Mandall, Nicola
    Lewis, David
    Sandler, Jonathan
    Hammond, Mark
    Chadwick, Stephen
    O'Neill, Julian
    McDade, Catherine
    Oskouei, Mojtaba
    Thiruvenkatachari, Badri
    Read, Michael
    Robinson, Stephen
    Birnie, David
    Murray, Alison
    Shaw, Iain
    Harradine, Nigel
    Worthington, Helen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 135 (05) : 573 - 579
  • [6] Treatment of adolescent patients with class II division 1 malocclusion using Eruption guidance appliance: A comparative study with Twin-block and Activator-Headgear appliance: A comparative study with Twin-block and Activator-Headgear appliances
    Nilsson, Jenny Jiayan Luo
    Shu, Xiaochen
    Magnusson, Britt Heden Berg
    Burt, Idil Alatli
    SWEDISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2016, 40 (01) : 79 - 89
  • [7] Early Treatment for Class II Division1 Malocclusion with the Twin-Block Appliance: A Multi-Center, Randomized, Controlled Trial
    O'Brien, K.
    Wright, J.
    Conboy, F.
    Appelbe, P.
    Davies, L.
    Connolly, I.
    Mitchell, L.
    Littlewood, S.
    Mandall, N.
    Lewis, D.
    Sandler, J.
    Hammond, M.
    Chadwick, S.
    O'Neill, J.
    McDade, C.
    Oskouei, M.
    Thiruvenkatachari, B.
    Read, M.
    Robinson, S.
    Birnie, D.
    Murray, A.
    Shaw, I.
    Harradine, N.
    Worthington, H.
    INFORMATIONEN AUS ORTHODONTIE UND KIEFERORTHOPAEDIE, 2010, 42 (02): : 97 - 103
  • [8] Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion
    Jamilian, Abdolreza
    Showkatbakhsh, Rahman
    Amiri, Shabnam Sheikholeslam
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2011, 33 (04) : 354 - 358
  • [9] Effects of Twin-block vs sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance on alveolar bone around mandibular incisors in growing patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion
    Zhang, Chun-xi
    Shen, Gang
    Ning, Yu-jun
    Liu, Hong
    Zhao, Yi
    Liu, Dong-xu
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 157 (03) : 329 - 339
  • [10] Severe Class II Division 1 malocclusion in an adolescent patient, treated with a novel sagittal-guidance Twin-block appliance
    Li, Peilun
    Feng, Jing
    Shen, Gang
    Zhao, Ning
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2016, 150 (01) : 153 - 166