Perception of the quality of life and social support of a patient with mechanical circulatory support and their caregiver

被引:0
|
作者
Witkowska, Emilia [1 ]
Cebula, Marta [2 ]
Milaniak, Irena [2 ]
机构
[1] Krakowski Szpital Specjalist Sw Jana Pawla II, Oddzial Transplantol & Mechanicznego Wspomagan Kra, Krakow, Poland
[2] Uniwersytet Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego Krakowie, Katedra Pielegniarstwa, Wydzial Nauk Zdrowiu, Coll Med, Krakow, Poland
来源
PIELEGNIARSTWO CHIRURGICZNE I ANGIOLOGICZNE-SURGICAL AND VASCULAR NURSING | 2024年 / 03期
关键词
LVAD; quality of life; social support; heart failure; VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE;
D O I
10.5114/.2024.144115
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Introduction: Heart failure is a complex pathological condition. Modern surgical treatment methods for advanced heart failure include heart transplantation (HTX) and mechanical circulatory support. The most common form of long-term mechanical support of the circulatory system is mechanical support of the left ventricle (LVAD). The use of HTX and LVAD comes with many bio-psychological and social problems for patients and their caregivers. Patients with an LVAD often experience significant changes in quality of life, and living with an LVAD affects many areas of the patient's and family's daily life. Social support plays a key role in the life of a patient and their family to provide the best care and improve quality of life. The aim of the study was to assess the quality of life and social support of a patient with mechanical circulatory support and their caregiver. Material and methods: The study was conducted among patients after implantation of long-term mechanical circulatory support and their caregivers - 54 dyads of patients and their caregivers. A diagnostic survey method was used, along with standardised questionnaires: the Berlin Social Support Scale for assessing social support, SF-12 for assessing quality of life, and 7 demographic questions. Results: The results showed that the caregivers of patients with implanted mechanical circulatory system support rated their quality of life much higher than did the patients. The perceived available instrumental support was dominant among patients and caregivers. There was no correlation between the quality of life and social support among respondents. Demographic and social data impacted the assessment of social support among caregivers but did not impact the evaluation among patients with LVAD. The time since the implantation of mechanical circulatory support worsens the quality of life in the mental category in patients with LVAD and their caregivers. Conclusions: The quality of life of patients was low compared to population studies. The passage of time after LVAD implantation deteriorated the quality of life in the mental domain. To improve the quality of life in the mental domain, psychological support for patients and their caregivers is necessary.
引用
收藏
页码:94 / 100
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mechanical Circulatory Support for the Pediatric Patient
    Carberry, Kathleen E.
    Gunter, Kathyrn S.
    Gemmato, Courtney J.
    Morales, David L. S.
    CRITICAL CARE NURSING QUARTERLY, 2007, 30 (02) : 121 - 142
  • [2] Patient selection for mechanical circulatory support
    Nisha A. Gilotra
    Stuart D. Russell
    Heart Failure Reviews, 2013, 18 : 27 - 34
  • [3] Patient selection for mechanical circulatory support
    Gilotra, Nisha A.
    Russell, Stuart D.
    HEART FAILURE REVIEWS, 2013, 18 (01) : 27 - 34
  • [4] Mechanical Circulatory Support Caregiver Gender Burden and Benefit: Is There a Difference?
    Coleman, B.
    Barone, H.
    Aronow, H.
    Runyan, C.
    Hajj, J.
    Huie, N.
    Passano, E.
    Czer, L.
    Kobashigawa, J. A.
    Moriguchi, J.
    Arabia, F.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 36 (04): : S358 - S359
  • [5] Type of Caregiver and Outcome After Mechanical Circulatory Support Placement
    Henry, H.
    Arabia, F.
    Kittleson, M.
    Czer, L.
    Passano, E.
    Yabuno, J.
    Siddiqui, S.
    Antifantis, E.
    Chang, D.
    Kobashigawa, J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 15
  • [6] Sleep, daytime function and quality of life of patients with mechanical circulatory support
    Casida, J.
    Brewer, R.
    Smith, C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2012, 11 : S10 - S11
  • [7] Sustaining Quality of Life of the Aged: Transplant or Mechanical Support: Baseline Caregiver Quality of Life.
    Grady, Kathleen L.
    Okwuosa, Ike
    Petty, Michael
    Adam, Hubert
    Pollan, Laura
    Andrei, Adin-Cristian
    Kao, Andrew
    Pham Duc Thinh
    Yancy, Clyde
    Dew, Mary Amanda
    Kormos, Robert
    Hsich, Eileen
    Cotts, William
    LaRue, Shane
    Pamboukian, Salpy, V
    Pagani, Francis D.
    Lampert, Brent
    Johnson, Maryl
    Murray, Margaret
    Tekeda, Koji
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Spertus, John
    Kirklin, James K.
    Collum, Stephen C.
    Anderson, Allen S.
    CIRCULATION, 2018, 138
  • [8] A Patient-Centric Conceptual Framework for Health-related Quality of Life in Mechanical Circulatory Support
    Grady, K. L.
    Magasi, S.
    Hahn, E. A.
    McGee, E. C., Jr.
    Yancy, C.
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 33 (04): : S33 - S33
  • [9] Preoperative patient optimization for mechanical circulatory support
    Houston, Brian A.
    Russell, Stuart D.
    ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 3 (06) : 626 - 629
  • [10] Mechanical circulatory support in CS: device or patient?
    Morici, Nuccia
    Tavazzi, Guido
    OPEN HEART, 2021, 8 (02):