Cost-Utility Analysis and Efficiency Frontier of Drugs Available in Brazil for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

被引:0
|
作者
Barros, Bruno M. [1 ]
Correia, Marcelo G. [1 ]
Tura, Bernardo R. [1 ]
Magliano, Carlos S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cardiol Inst, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
cost-utility analysis; efficiency frontier; relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; net benefit; DISEASE-MODIFYING THERAPIES; PLACEBO-CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELEASE DIMETHYL FUMARATE; INTERFERON BETA-1A; CONTROLLED PHASE-3; DOUBLE-BLIND; GLATIRAMER ACETATE; INTRAMUSCULAR INTERFERON; PEGINTERFERON BETA-1A; ORAL TERIFLUNOMIDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.vhri.2025.101092
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: In the Brazilian Public Health System (SUS), the different drugs for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) are used in an escalating approach, through therapeutic lines from lowest to highest efficacy. Early intensive treatment, indicating the use of more effective drugs for the first symptoms of the disease, has been advocated by some specialists; however, the clinical and economic impact of this strategy is unknown. The aim of this study was to conduct cost-utility, net benefit, and efficiency frontier (EF) analyses for all drugs approved in Brazil for RRMS. Methods: A Markov model was constructed from the SUS perspective to conduct economic analyses. The outcomes of the annualized relapse rate and sustained disability progression were modeled, considering disease progression according to changes in levels on the Expanded Disability Status Scale. Net benefit and EF analyses were also conducted. Results: In the cost-utility assessment, 12 of the 14 drugs were dominated by alemtuzumab and teriflunomide. An EF was established between the 2 drugs with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $8231.87/quality-adjusted life-years. Teriflunomide obtained the best results in the net benefit assessment. Most drugs had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio below the cost-utility threshold ($8000.00/quality-adjusted life-years) in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Conclusions: Early intensive treatment of EF may modify the current RRMS treatment paradigm, and the results presented may help define the cost utility of new entrants to the SUS.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-utility analysis of disease-modifying drugs in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in Iran
    Imani, Ali
    Golestani, Mina
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2012, 11 (03) : 87 - 90
  • [2] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF DISEASE-MODIFYING DRUGS IN RELAPSING-REMITTING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS IN IRAN
    Imani, A.
    Golestani, M.
    Tabrizi, J. S.
    Janati, A.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (07) : A624 - A624
  • [3] Cost-utility analysis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treatment with azathioprine or interferon beta in Spain
    Rubio-Terrés, C
    Hurlé, ADG
    REVISTA DE NEUROLOGIA, 2005, 40 (12) : 705 - 710
  • [4] Cost-utility analysis of the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with glatiramer acetate or interferon beta in Spain
    Rubio-Terrés, C
    Medina, F
    Aristegui, I
    Izquierdo, G
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2003, 6 (03) : 277 - 277
  • [5] Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness analysis of disease-modifying drugs of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a systematic review
    Gallehzan, Nasrin Abulhasanbeigi
    Khosravi, Majid
    Jamebozorgi, Khosro
    Mir, Nazanin
    Jalilian, Habib
    Soleimanpour, Samira
    Hoseini, Saeed
    Rezapour, Aziz
    Eshraghi, Abbas
    HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [6] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF DELAYED-RELEASE DIMETHYL FUMERATE FOR THE TREATMENT OF RELAPSING-REMITTING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS IN PORTUGAL
    Silva Miguel, L.
    de Sa, J.
    Pinheiro, B.
    Acosta, C.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2015, 18 (07) : A758 - A758
  • [7] DIMETHYL FUMARATE VERSUS FINGOLIMOD AND TERIFLUNOMIDE FOR THE TREATMENT OF RELAPSING-REMITTING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS IN COLOMBIA: A COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS
    Ordonez, J. E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2017, 20 (05) : A194 - A194
  • [8] Cost-Utility Analysis Comparing Ocrelizumab vs Rituximab in the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: The Colombian Perspective
    Navarro, Cristian E.
    Betancur, John E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH REGIONAL ISSUES, 2023, 36 : 83 - 91
  • [9] COST-UTILITY ANALYSIS OF ALEMTUZUMAB VERSUS NATALIZUMAB FOR THE TREATMENT OF RELAPSING-REMITTING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS: US PAYER PERSPECTIVE
    Smith, A.
    Hashemi, L.
    Ma, I
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2016, 19 (07) : A431 - A431
  • [10] Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Cost-Utility Analysis
    Zimmermann, Marita
    Brouwer, Elizabeth
    Tice, Jeffrey A.
    Seidner, Matt
    Loos, Anne M.
    Liu, Shanshan
    Chapman, Richard H.
    Kumar, Varun
    Carlson, Josh J.
    CNS DRUGS, 2018, 32 (12) : 1145 - 1157