Intravenous lidocaine infusion therapy and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in adolescents undergoing idiopathic scoliosis correction: A retrospective study

被引:0
|
作者
Bates, Rachel [1 ,2 ]
Cave, Fiona [3 ]
West, Nicholas [1 ,2 ]
Bone, Jeffrey N. [2 ]
Hofmann, Bradley [4 ]
Miyanji, Firoz [2 ,5 ,6 ]
Lauder, Gillian R. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] British Columbia Childrens Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[2] British Columbia Childrens Hosp, Res Inst, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Kelowna Gen Hosp, Dept Neurodiagnost, Kelowna, BC, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Dept Anesthesiol Pharmacol & Therapeut, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Dept Orthopaed, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] British Columbia Childrens Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring; intravenous lidocaine infusion; posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion; SOMATOSENSORY-EVOKED POTENTIALS; MOTOR; PROPOFOL; SURGERY; PAIN; ANESTHESIA; ISOFLURANE; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1111/pan.15019
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundPosterior spinal instrumentation and fusion is an established surgical procedure for the correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is standard practice for this procedure. Anesthetic agents can have different, but significant, effects on neurophysiological monitoring outcomes.AimTo determine if intravenous lidocaine infusion therapy has an impact on the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.MethodsFollowing ethical approval, we conducted a retrospective review of charts and the archived intraoperative neurophysiological data of adolescents undergoing posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring data included the amplitude of motor evoked potentials and the amplitude and latency of somatosensory evoked potentials. A cohort who received intraoperative lidocaine infusion were compared to those who did not.ResultsEighty-one patients were included in this analysis, who had surgery between February 4, 2016 and April 22, 2021: 39 had intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion and 42 did not. Based on hourly snapshot data, there was no evidence that lidocaine infusion had a detrimental effect on the measured change from baseline for MEP amplitudes in either lower (mean difference 41.9; 95% confidence interval -304.5 to 388.3; p = .182) or upper limbs (MD -279.0; 95% CI -562.5 to 4.4; p = .054). There was also no evidence of any effect on the measured change from baseline for SSEP amplitudes in either lower (MD 16.4; 95% CI -17.7 to 50.5; p = .345) or upper limbs (MD -2.4; 95% CI -14.5 to 9.8; p = .701). Finally, there was no evidence of a difference in time to first reportable neurophysiological event (hazard ratio 1.13; 95% CI 0.61 to 2.09; p = .680).ConclusionsData from these two cohorts provide preliminary evidence that intravenous lidocaine infusion has no negative impact on intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during PSIF for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 56
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The effect of intraoperative lidocaine infusion on postoperative opioid consumption in adolescents undergoing posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic scoliosis
    Lin, Richard
    Zhu, Kai
    Poznikoff, Andrew K.
    Go, Matthias
    Brown, E.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (07): : 1047 - 1048
  • [2] Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Surgical Correction of Neuromuscular Scoliosis
    Kamenova, B.
    Ivanov, A.
    NEUROSONOLOGY AND CEREBRAL HEMODYNAMICS, 2023, 19 (02): : 155 - 165
  • [3] Association between intraoperative intravenous lidocaine infusion and survival in patients undergoing pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study
    Zhang, Hao
    Yang, Li
    Zhu, Xuqin
    Zhu, Minmin
    Sun, Zhirong
    Cata, Juan P.
    Chen, Wankun
    Miao, Changhong
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 125 (02) : 141 - 148
  • [4] The peri-operative impact of intravenous lidocaine therapy in adolescents with idiopathic scoliosis undergoing posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion surgery
    Keough, J.
    McMonagle, M.
    Siew, S.
    Bordoni, J.
    Ravi, R.
    Okonkwo, I.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2021, 76 : 46 - 46
  • [5] Lidocaine infusion adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia reduces the total dose of propofol during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring
    Sloan, Tod B.
    Mongan, Paul
    Lyda, Clark
    Koht, Antoun
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2014, 28 (02) : 139 - 147
  • [6] Lidocaine infusion adjunct to total intravenous anesthesia reduces the total dose of propofol during intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring
    Tod B. Sloan
    Paul Mongan
    Clark Lyda
    Antoun Koht
    Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2014, 28 : 139 - 147
  • [7] Anesthetic considerations for intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in patients undergoing scoliosis surgery
    Naik, Naveen
    Samra, Tanvir
    NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2018, 66 (01) : 279 - +
  • [8] Risk Factors and Exit Strategy of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring Alert During Deformity Correction for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
    Lee, Choon Sung
    Hwang, Chang-Ju
    Lee, Dong-Ho
    Cho, Jae Hwan
    Park, Sehan
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 14 (07) : 2012 - 2021
  • [9] A Preliminary Study of Volatile Agents or Total Intravenous Anesthesia for Neurophysiological Monitoring During Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescents With Idiopathic Scoliosis
    Martin, David P.
    Bhalla, Tarun
    Thung, Arlyne
    Rice, Julie
    Beebe, Allan
    Samora, Walter
    Klamar, Jan
    Tobias, Joseph D.
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (22) : E1318 - E1324
  • [10] The value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during positioning in pediatric scoliosis correction: A case report
    Cavinato, M.
    Vittoria, F.
    Piccione, F.
    Masiero, S.
    Carbone, M.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY PRACTICE, 2022, 7 : 366 - 371