Research With the Reluctant: Challenges and Strategies

被引:0
|
作者
Gross, E. B. [1 ,2 ]
Gelman, Susan A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Social Work, Ann Arbor, MI USA
关键词
reluctant participants; hard-to-reach populations; hidden populations; vulnerable populations; sampling; HEALTH; PSYCHOLOGY; SCIENCE; RECRUITMENT; TEXT; BIAS;
D O I
10.1177/25152459241304775
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although psychological research often relies on convenience samples, the most informative participants may be individuals who are reluctant to engage because of vulnerability, mistrust of the research process, and/or disagreement with a study's goals. Although this concern is particularly urgent for certain research questions, it is relevant for all researchers because relying solely on easy-to-reach participants limits a study's validity and generalizability and may substantially hollow out or even render unanswerable some research questions. We review a number of challenges for conducting research with "reluctant but informative" participants and strategies to meet and overcome these challenges. We argue that engaging reluctant participants requires attention at every phase of the research process, including study design and planning, participant recruitment and testing, data analysis and interpretation, and reporting and broader impacts. We also illustrate with our own recent experiences conducting research on children's gender concepts in rural, conservative U.S. communities that expressed skepticism about the value of this research. Although every study is different, notable across all projects are the need to respect both individual participants and their communities and to balance competing desiderata. Finally, we discuss the importance of transparency around sample composition and constraints to generalizability and the potential utility of collaborative research both across research institutions and between researchers and participant communities.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Challenges and Strategies for Research in Prisons
    Apa, Zoltan L.
    Bai, RuoYu
    Mukherejee, Dhritiman V.
    Herzig, Carolyn T. A.
    Koenigsmann, Carl
    Lowy, Franklin D.
    Larson, Elaine L.
    PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2012, 29 (05) : 467 - 472
  • [2] Research strategies and clinical challenges in neuroscience
    Eapen, Valsamma
    Adem, Abu
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2006, 61 (03) : 281 - 282
  • [3] Consent to Research in Madagascar: Challenges, Strategies, and Priorities for Future Research
    Nouvet, Elysee
    Lapierre, Simon Grandjean
    Knoblauch, Astrid
    Baril, Laurence
    Andriamiadanarivo, Andry
    Raberahona, Mihaja
    Mattern, Chiarella
    Donelle, Lorie
    Andriantsoa, Jean Rubis
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BIOETHIQUE, 2022, 5 (01): : 33 - 44
  • [4] Proteomic strategies and challenges in tumor metastasis research
    Hudler, Petra
    Gorsic, Masa
    Komel, Radovan
    CLINICAL & EXPERIMENTAL METASTASIS, 2010, 27 (06) : 441 - 451
  • [5] Collaborative and Reproducible Research: Goals, Challenges, and Strategies
    Steve G. Langer
    George Shih
    Paul Nagy
    Bennet A. Landman
    Journal of Digital Imaging, 2018, 31 : 275 - 282
  • [6] FUNDING STRATEGIES FOR AGRICULTURAL-RESEARCH CHALLENGES
    HESS, CE
    HORTSCIENCE, 1992, 27 (03) : 201 - 203
  • [7] Proteomic strategies and challenges in tumor metastasis research
    Petra Hudler
    Masa Gorsic
    Radovan Komel
    Clinical & Experimental Metastasis, 2010, 27 : 441 - 451
  • [8] Challenges and Strategies of Teaching Qualitative Research in China
    Chen, Xiangming
    QUALITATIVE INQUIRY, 2016, 22 (02) : 72 - 86
  • [9] Research on antibacterial strategies: New tracks and challenges?
    Lacotte, Y.
    Francois, B.
    Brun-Buisson, C.
    Jouvin-Marche, E.
    Ploy, M. -C.
    BULLETIN DE L ACADEMIE NATIONALE DE MEDECINE, 2019, 203 (3-4): : 179 - 185
  • [10] Challenges and Strategies of Forest Research and Education in China
    Zhang Shougong
    FOREST SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 1 (02) : 203 - 210