Evaluating REDD plus Readiness: High-Potential Countries Based on MRV Capacity

被引:0
|
作者
Yang, Hyunyoung [1 ]
Song, Minkyung [2 ]
Son, Hyeonyu [1 ]
Kim, Raehyun [2 ]
Choi, Eunho [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Forest Sci, Future Forest Strategy Dept, Forest Strategy Res Div, Seoul 02455, South Korea
[2] Natl Inst Forest Sci, Forest Carbon Ctr Climate Change, Future Forest Strategy Dept, Seoul 02455, South Korea
来源
FORESTS | 2025年 / 16卷 / 01期
关键词
Warsaw Framework for REDD plus (WFR); readiness phase; MRV capacity assessment; phase; 1; countries; strategy for enhancement of MRV; FOREST DEGRADATION; DEFORESTATION; EMISSIONS; PROGRESS;
D O I
10.3390/f16010067
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
The REDD+ framework (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation, along with sustainable forest management and the conservation and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries) incentivizes developing countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and enhance carbon storage by mitigating deforestation and forest degradation. To receive results-based payments, participating countries must meet United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) requirements for Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) capacities. This study categorizes developing countries into three phases based on MRV implementation levels: phase 1 (readiness), phase 2 (demonstration), and phase 3 (implementation). Unlike the higher implementation levels observed in phase 2 and phase 3 countries, phase 1 countries have received limited attention due to their early stages of REDD+ implementation. However, assessing the potential of these countries for future REDD+ engagement and Internationally Transferred Mitigation Outcome (ITMO) collaboration is crucial for achieving REDD+ goals. Thus, this study quantitatively assessed MRV capacity among phase 1 countries using an MRV capacity assessment tool, with the goal of identifying high-potential candidates for REDD+ advancement. We applied an MRV capacity assessment tool to 48 phase 1 countries out of the 71 developing countries registered on the REDD+ web platform as of September 2024. The results reveal that (1) the countries with the highest MRV scores were Ghana, India, Guatemala, Liberia, and Mongolia, with Ghana demonstrating strong potential for progression to the implementation phase due to its robust performance in both Measurement and Reporting components. In contrast, Chad scored the lowest, followed by Uruguay, Namibia, Mali, Cuba, and Benin. (2) Overall, phase 1 countries scored lower in the Reporting (R) component, which emphasizes administrative capacity, compared to the Measurement (M) component, which is technically oriented, highlighting the need for improved administrative capacity, particularly in developing and submitting the National Strategy/Action Plan and Safeguard Information System report to meet Cancun Agreement standards. While this study evaluates REDD+ implementation potential in phase 1 countries based on MRV capacity, future research should explore the effectiveness of strengthening MRV capacity through Official Development Assistance (ODA), assessing potential emissions reduction and ITMO potential.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Are Countries Ready for REDD plus Payments? REDD plus Readiness in Bhutan, India, Myanmar, and Nepal
    Bhattarai, Nabin
    Karky, Bhaskar Singh
    Avtar, Ram
    Thapa, Rajesh Bahadur
    Watanabe, Teiji
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (07)
  • [2] Assessment of REDD+ MRV Capacity in Developing Countries and Implications under the Paris Regime
    Kim, Raehyun
    Kim, Dong-hwan
    Cho, Seongsil
    Choi, Eunho
    Park, Jinwoo
    Lee, Sue Kyoung
    Son, Yowhan
    LAND, 2021, 10 (09)
  • [3] Towards REDD plus implementation: Deforestation and forest degradation drivers, REDD plus financing, and readiness activities in participant countries
    Andoh, Jewel
    Oduro, Kwame Antwi
    Park, Joowon
    Lee, Yohan
    FRONTIERS IN FORESTS AND GLOBAL CHANGE, 2022, 5
  • [4] Institutional effectiveness of REDD plus MRV: Countries progress in implementing technical guidelines and good governance requirements
    Ochieng, R. M.
    Visseren-Hamakers, I. J.
    Arts, B.
    Brockhaus, M.
    Herold, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2016, 61 : 42 - 52
  • [5] REDD plus measurement, reporting and verification - A cost trap? Implications for financing REDD plus MRV costs by result-based payments
    Koehl, Michael
    Neupane, Prem Raj
    Mundhenk, Philip
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 168
  • [6] Potential of Different Optical and SAR Data in Forest and Land Cover Classification to Support REDD plus MRV
    Sirro, Laura
    Hame, Tuomas
    Rauste, Yrjo
    Kilpi, Jorma
    Hamalainen, Jarno
    Gunia, Katja
    de Jong, Bernardus
    Paz Pellat, Fernando
    REMOTE SENSING, 2018, 10 (06)
  • [7] Community-based forest monitoring for REDD plus MRV in the Ansaka Conservation Area, Ghana
    Damnyag, L.
    Bampoh, A. A.
    Mohammed, Y.
    INTERNATIONAL FORESTRY REVIEW, 2023, 25 (03) : 300 - 309
  • [8] How countries link REDD plus interventions to drivers in their readiness plans: implications for monitoring systems
    Salvini, G.
    Herold, M.
    De Sy, V.
    Kissinger, G.
    Brockhaus, M.
    Skutsch, M.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2014, 9 (07):
  • [9] Financing and current capacity for REDD plus readiness and monitoring, measurement, reporting and verification in the Congo Basin
    Maniatis, Danae
    Gaugris, Jerome
    Mollicone, Danilo
    Scriven, Joel
    Corblin, Alexis
    Ndikumagenge, Cleto
    Aquino, Andre
    Crete, Philippe
    Sanz-Sanchez, Maria-Jose
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 368 (1625)
  • [10] Capacity Development for Use of Remote Sensing for REDD plus MRV Using Online and Offline Activities: Impacts and Lessons Learned
    Carter, Sarah
    Herold, Martin
    Jonckheere, Inge G. C.
    Espejo, Andres B.
    Green, Carly
    Wilson, Sylvia
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (11)