Evidence for the extent and oncological benefits of lymphadenectomy in colon and rectal cancer. A narrative review based on meta-analyses

被引:0
|
作者
Stelzner, Sigmar [1 ]
Lange, Undine Gabriele [1 ]
Rabe, Sebastian Murad [1 ]
Niebisch, Stefan [1 ]
Mehdorn, Matthias [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Leipzig, Klin Viszeral Transplantat Thorax & Gefasschirurg, Liebigstr 20, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
来源
CHIRURGIE | 2025年
关键词
Low and high tie; Lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy; Longitudinal extent of resection; Infrapyloric and gastroepiploic lymph nodes; Sentinel node technique; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; COMPLETE MESOCOLIC EXCISION; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; COLORECTAL-CANCER; NEOADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY; SURGERY; RESECTION; LIGATION; SURVIVAL; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s00104-024-02212-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer is clearly defined by total mesorectal excision (TME). The analogous surgical strategy for the colon, the complete mesocolic excision (CME), follows the same principles of dissection in embryologically predefined planes. Method: This narrative review initially identified key issues related to lymphadenectomy of rectal and colon cancer. The subsequent search was based on PubMed and focused on meta-analyses. The endpoints for rectal cancer were the benefit of high tie versus low tie and the indications for lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. For colon cancer the evidence for CME, for the longitudinal extent of resection, for the dissection of infrapyloric and gastroepiploic lymph nodes, for the number of lymph nodes and for the sentinel lymph node technique were used as endpoints. Results: An oncological benefit of the high tie cannot be derived from the current data. Lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy should only be selectively performed after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in cases of remaining lymph nodes with suspected metastases. In most studies CME proved to be oncologically superior, especially in stage III. The longitudinal extent of resection should be at least 10 cm in both directions if the principles of CME are observed. Infrapyloric and gastroepiploic lymph node involvement is to be expected in 0.7-22% of cases, depending on patient selection, which justifies dissection, particularly in carcinomas of both flexure and the transverse colon. The minimum number of lymph nodes to be removed cannot be clearly derived from the available studies. Precisely performed CME and an optimal pathological work-up are important. The sentinel lymph node technique cannot currently be used as a criterion for limiting the extent of resection. Conclusion: Both TME and CME are reliable standards for the lymphadenectomy in colorectal carcinomas. A lymphadenectomy that goes beyond this is reserved for selected cases and is partly the subject of currently ongoing studies.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evidenz für Ausmaß und onkologischen Nutzen der Lymphadenektomie beim Kolon- und RektumkarzinomEin narratives Review basierend auf MetaanalysenEvidence for the extent and oncological benefits of lymphadenectomy in colon and rectal cancerA narrative review based on meta-analyses
    Sigmar Stelzner
    Undine Gabriele Lange
    Sebastian Murad Rabe
    Stefan Niebisch
    Matthias Mehdorn
    Die Chirurgie, 2025, 96 (4) : 293 - 305
  • [2] DIETARY FIBER, VEGETABLES, AND COLON CANCER - CRITICAL-REVIEW AND META-ANALYSES OF THE EPIDEMIOLOGIC EVIDENCE
    TROCK, B
    LANZA, E
    GREENWALD, P
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1990, 82 (08): : 650 - 661
  • [3] Circulating tumour DNA as biomarker for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analyses
    Van Rees, Jan M.
    Wullaert, Lissa
    Grueter, Alexander A. J.
    Derraze, Yassmina
    Tanis, Pieter J.
    Verheul, Henk M. W.
    Martens, John W. M.
    Wilting, Saskia M.
    Vink, Geraldine
    Van Vugt, Jeroen L. A.
    Beije, Nick
    Verhoef, Cornelis
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2023, 13
  • [4] An evidence-based medicine review of lymphadenectomy extent for gastric cancer
    Yang, Sun Hu
    Zhang, You Cheng
    Yang, Ke Hu
    Li, You Ping
    He, Xiao Dong
    Tian, Jin Hui
    Lv, Ting Hong
    Hui, Ying Hua
    Sharma, Neel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 197 (02): : 246 - 251
  • [5] An evidence-based medicine review of lymphadenectomy extent for gastric cancer
    Slim, Karem
    Vons, Corinne
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 198 (04): : 580 - 580
  • [6] D3-lymphadenectomy enhances oncological clearance in patients with right colon cancer. Results of a meta-analysis
    Balciscueta, Zutoia
    Balciscueta, Izaskun
    Uribe, Natalia
    Pellino, Gianluca
    Frasson, Matteo
    Garcia-Granero, Eduardo
    Garcia-Granero, Alvaro
    EJSO, 2021, 47 (07): : 1541 - 1551
  • [7] The Frequency of Urination Dysfunction in Patients Operated on for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses
    Agustsdottir, Dagny Halla
    Oberg, Stina
    Christophersen, Camilla
    Oggesen, Birthe Thing
    Rosenberg, Jacob
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY, 2024, 31 (10) : 5929 - 5942
  • [8] Commentary for an evidence-based medicine review of lymphadenectomy extent for gastric cancer
    Yang, Sun Hu
    Zhang, You Cheng
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 203 (03): : 413 - 414
  • [9] Health benefits of qigong or tai chi for cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analyses
    Zeng, Yingchun
    Luo, Taizhen
    Xie, Huaan
    Huang, Meiling
    Cheng, Andy S. K.
    COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES IN MEDICINE, 2014, 22 (01) : 173 - 186
  • [10] The Benefits of Dietary Fiber Intake on Reducing the Risk of Cancer: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses
    McRae, Marc P.
    JOURNAL OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE, 2018, 17 (02) : 90 - 96