Occurrence, Characteristics, and Mixed Reproductive Exposure Risk Assessment of Traditional Phthalates and Their Novel Alternatives in Campus Indoor Dust

被引:0
|
作者
Gao, Ke [1 ]
Hua, Kai [1 ]
Chen, Xi [2 ]
Zheng, Congyi [1 ]
Li, Xingtong [1 ]
Wu, Qingyan [1 ]
Ji, Lingrui [1 ]
Wang, Linxiao [1 ]
Wei, Wei [1 ]
Lu, Liping [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Technol, Dept Environm Sci, Key Lab Beijing Reg Air Pollut Control, Beijing 100124, Peoples R China
[2] Shenzhen Inst Bldg Res Co Ltd, Hebei Technol Innovat Ctr Human Settlement Green B, Xiongan 071700, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
phthalates; indoor dust; mixed exposure risk; reproductive health; quantitative structure-activityrelationship; URBAN DWELLINGS; HOUSE-DUST; ESTERS; CHINA; PLASTICIZERS; POLLUTION; FATE;
D O I
10.1021/acs.est.4c10394
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Phthalates (PAEs) constitute the primary components of indoor dust pollutants and significantly impact human reproductive health. However, research on novel alternatives to PAEs and the risk assessment of mixed exposure has remained relatively sparse. In this study, 193 indoor dust samples were collected in 2022 from various campus locations, including classrooms, canteens, dormitories, offices, and laboratories. Forty-four traditional PAEs and their alternatives were identified, with concentrations ranging from 0.44 to 91.5 mu g/g. Di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) and dioctyl terephthalate (DEHTH) were the predominant compounds, with mean concentrations of 86.3 and 59.2 mu g/g, respectively. The ingestion pathway was the principal route of exposure, with dormitories identified as the primary exposure sites. The mixed reproductive toxicity equivalent factor (TEFmix) of PAEs and their alternatives was developed using a quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) model in conjunction with machine learning algorithms. The TEFmix was found to be lower than the sum of individual PAEs, potentially due to the antagonistic effects of PAE monomers on reproductive health. Under high-exposure scenarios, the TEFmix of PAEs in canteen dust was determined to be 0.245, surpassing values observed in other environments. Females exhibited a higher risk, with dormitories presenting a greater exposure risk than those in other indoor locations. This study provided essential data to inform regulatory measures aimed at mitigating the impact of PAEs and their alternatives in indoor dust on human reproductive health.
引用
收藏
页码:6708 / 6718
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Phthalates in House and Dormitory Dust: Occurrence, Human Exposure and Risk Assessment
    Xu, Shen
    Li, Chao
    BULLETIN OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONTAMINATION AND TOXICOLOGY, 2021, 106 (02) : 393 - 398
  • [2] Phthalates in House and Dormitory Dust: Occurrence, Human Exposure and Risk Assessment
    Shen Xu
    Chao Li
    Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2021, 106 : 393 - 398
  • [3] Occurrence and exposure risk assessment of organic micropollutants in indoor dust from Malaysia
    Yang, Jianlei
    Ching, Yern Chee
    Kadokami, Kiwao
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2022, 287
  • [4] Phthalates in dormitory and house dust of northern Chinese cities: Occurrence, human exposure, and risk assessment
    Li, Hai-Ling
    Song, Wei-Wei
    Zhang, Zi-Feng
    Ma, Wan-Li
    Gao, Chong-Jing
    Li, Jia
    Huo, Chun-Yan
    Mohammed, Mohammed O. A.
    Liu, Li-Yan
    Kannan, Kurunthachalam
    Li, Yi-Fan
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2016, 565 : 496 - 502
  • [5] Traditional and emerging organophosphate esters (OPEs) in indoor dust of Nanjing, eastern China: Occurrence, human exposure, and risk assessment
    Zhao, Luming
    Zhang, Yayun
    Deng, Yirong
    Jian, Kang
    Li, Jianhua
    Ya, Miaolei
    Su, Guanyong
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 712
  • [6] Prevalence of phthalate alternatives and monoesters alongside traditional phthalates in indoor dust from a typical e-waste recycling area: Source elucidation and co-exposure risk
    Deng, Man
    Han, Xu
    Ge, Jiali
    Liang, Xinxin
    Du, Bibai
    Li, Juan
    Zeng, Lixi
    JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2021, 413
  • [7] Occurrence, sources and human exposure assessment of SCCPs in indoor dust of northeast China
    Liu, Li-Hua
    Ma, Wan-Li
    Liu, Li-Yan
    Huo, Chun-Yan
    Li, Wen-Long
    Gao, Chong-Jing
    Li, Hai-Ling
    Li, Yi-Fan
    Chan, Hing Man
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2017, 225 : 232 - 243
  • [8] Comparison, association, and risk assessment of phthalates in floor dust at different indoor environments in Delaware, USA
    Bi, Xiaolong
    Yuan, Shoujun
    Pan, Xiaojun
    Winstead, Cherese
    Wang, Qiquan
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-TOXIC/HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 50 (14): : 1428 - 1439
  • [9] International quantification of microplastics in indoor dust: prevalence, exposure and risk assessment
    Soltani, Neda Sharifi
    Taylor, Mark Patrick
    Wilson, Scott Paton
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2022, 312
  • [10] Occurrence of alternative flame retardants in indoor dust from New Zealand: Indoor sources and human exposure assessment
    Ali, Nadeem
    Dirtu, Alin C.
    Van den Eede, Nele
    Goosey, Emma
    Harrad, Stuart
    Neels, Hugo
    't Mannetje, Andrea
    Coakley, Jonathan
    Douwes, Jeroen
    Covaci, Adrian
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2012, 88 (11) : 1276 - 1282