Common Sense Reasoning for Deepfake Detection

被引:2
|
作者
Zhang, Yue [1 ,2 ]
Colman, Ben [2 ]
Guo, Xiao [1 ]
Shahriyari, Ali [2 ]
Bharaj, Gaurav [2 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, E Lansing, MI USA
[2] Real Defender Inc, Las Vegas, NV 89103 USA
来源
关键词
Vision and Language Model; Deepfake Detection;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-73223-2_22
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
State-of-the-art deepfake detection approaches rely on image-based features extracted via neural networks. While these approaches trained in a supervised manner extract likely fake features, they may fall short in representing unnatural 'non-physical' semantic facial attributes - blurry hairlines, double eyebrows, rigid eye pupils, or unnatural skin shading. However, such facial attributes are easily perceived by humans and used to discern the authenticity of an image based on human common sense. Furthermore, image-based feature extraction methods that provide visual explanations via saliency maps can be hard to interpret for humans. To address these challenges, we frame deepfake detection as a Deepfake Detection VQA (DD-VQA) task and model human intuition by providing textual explanations that describe common sense reasons for labeling an image as real or fake. We introduce a new annotated dataset and propose a Vision and Language Transformer-based framework for the DD-VQA task. We also incorporate text and image-aware feature alignment formulation to enhance multi-modal representation learning. As a result, we improve upon existing deepfake detection models by integrating our learned vision representations, which reason over common sense knowledge from the DD-VQA task. We provide extensive empirical results demonstrating that our method enhances detection performance, generalization ability, and language-based interpretability in the deepfake detection task. Our dataset is available at https://github.com/Reality-Defender/Research- DD-VQA.
引用
收藏
页码:399 / 415
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Common Sense Reasoning for Detection, Prevention, and Mitigation of Cyberbullying
    Dinakar, Karthik
    Picard, Rosalind
    Lieberman, Henry
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FOURTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI), 2015, : 4168 - 4172
  • [2] Common Sense Reasoning for Detection, Prevention, and Mitigation of Cyberbullying
    Dinakar, Karthik
    Jones, Birago
    Havasi, Catherine
    Lieberman, Henry
    Picard, Rosalind
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTERACTIVE INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2012, 2 (03)
  • [3] Common sense, reasoning, and rationality
    Trout, JD
    PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 15 (04) : 570 - 572
  • [4] TOULMIN: REASONING, COMMON SENSE AND DEFEASIBILITY
    Bravo, Claudio Fuentes
    Yanez, Cristian Santibanez
    KRITERION-REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA, 2014, 55 (130) : 531 - 548
  • [5] REASONING IN PHYSICS: THE CONTRIBUTION TO COMMON SENSE
    Marin Santamaria, Yorleny Carolina
    GONDOLA-ENSENANZA Y APRENDIZAJE DE LAS CIENCIAS, 2012, 7 (01): : 89 - 97
  • [6] Common Sense Reasoning for Knowledge Integration
    Freiling, Mike
    Sagalowicz, Daniel
    2017 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY (PICMET), 2017,
  • [7] Conditional logics and common sense reasoning
    Ines Corbalan, Maria
    Lopez, Federico E.
    REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA Y TEORIA POLITICA, 2005, 36 : 128 - 130
  • [8] Common sense, reasoning, and rationality.
    Olsson, EJ
    PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY, 2005, 55 (218): : 128 - 131
  • [9] Fuzzy quotients in reactive common sense reasoning
    Cebulla, Michael
    GRC: 2007 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GRANULAR COMPUTING, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, : 718 - 723
  • [10] Microcosms for testing common sense reasoning abilities
    Cassimatis, Nicholas L.
    Bignoli, Perrin
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL & THEORETICAL ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2011, 23 (03) : 279 - 298