The new J-curve testing methodology on the US-UK bilateral trade balance under the Brexit

被引:0
|
作者
Ongan, Serdar [1 ]
Karamelikli, Huseyin [2 ]
Gocer, Ismet [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Florida, Dept Econ, Tampa, FL 33620 USA
[2] Karabuk Univ, Dept Econ, Karabuk, Turkiye
[3] Univ Strathclyde, Dept Econ, Glasgow, Scotland
关键词
Brexit; domestic export; new approach to the J-curve hypothesis testing; re-export; EXCHANGE-RATE; ECONOMIC COMPLEXITY; CHINA TRADE; LEVEL; MEXICO;
D O I
10.1111/sjpe.12409
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study reexamines the J-curve hypothesis using a new methodology outside traditional practices. The increasing complexity of global bilateral trade and trade policy changes have made new methodologies inevitable. In response to this need, we create and use new forms of bilateral trade balances (BTB) rather than the traditional BTB ratio (exports/imports) constructed exclusively on total export data; this is because countries (e.g., the United States) also re-export to other countries (e.g., the United Kingdom) some previously imported goods, besides their domestic goods. These new forms of BTBs are created based on this difference and named re-export-based BTB and domestic-export-based BTB. Hence, these newly created BTBs may also allow us to perform new J-curve testing approaches, namely, domestic-exports-BTB-based J-curve hypothesis testing and re-exports-BTB-based J-curve hypothesis testing, separately. The main empirical finding suggests that J-curve hypothesis testing for the USA should be performed with the methodology proposed in this study; this is because, while we supported the long-run asymmetric J-curve hypothesis by US domestic-exports-BTB-based J-curve hypothesis for 10 goods, the same was supported by US re-exports-BTB-based J-curve hypothesis for only 3. Additionally, the depreciated USD improves, and the Brexit process worsens the export of US domestically produced goods more than re-exported goods.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TRADE BALANCE - UP J-CURVE
    不详
    FORTUNE, 1978, 97 (09) : 44 - 44
  • [2] DYNAMICS OF THE TRADE BALANCE AND THE TERMS OF TRADE - THE J-CURVE
    BACKUS, DK
    KEHOE, PJ
    KYDLAND, FE
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1994, 84 (01): : 84 - 103
  • [3] Dynamics of the trade balance - The Turkish J-curve
    Akbostanci, E
    EMERGING MARKETS FINANCE AND TRADE, 2004, 40 (05) : 57 - 73
  • [4] BREXIT and the J-Curve Hypothesis for the UK: A Nonlinear ARDL Approach
    Sivrikaya, Aysen
    Ongan, Serdar
    SOSYOEKONOMI, 2019, 27 (40) : 229 - 239
  • [5] Is there a J-curve in China-US trade?
    Upadhyaya, Kamal P.
    Mixon, Franklin G., Jr.
    Bhandari, Rabindra
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FINANCE & ECONOMICS, 2022, 27 (01) : 61 - 67
  • [6] The J-Curve: Evidence from Industry Trade Data between US and UK
    Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen
    Kovyryalova, Marina
    ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2008, 13 : 25 - +
  • [7] Asymmetric J-curve: evidence from industry trade between US and UK
    Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen
    Nasir, Muhammad Ali
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2019, : 2679 - 2693
  • [8] US Bilateral Trade with Euro Area Members: An Asymmetry Analysis of the J-Curve Effect
    Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen
    Harvey, Hanafiah
    ECONOMIC ISSUES, 2019, 24 : 21 - 35
  • [9] Exchange Rate and Trade Balance: J-curve Effect
    Petrovic, Pavle
    Gligoric, Mirjana
    PANOECONOMICUS, 2010, 57 (01) : 23 - 41
  • [10] Brazil-US commodity trade and the J-Curve
    Bahmani-Oskooee, Mohsen
    Harvey, Hanafiah
    Hegerty, Scott W.
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2014, 46 (01) : 1 - 13