Long-term Outcomes After Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery Using Lateral Interbody Fusion Short Versus Long Fusion

被引:0
|
作者
Tsutsui, Shunji [1 ]
Hashizume, Hiroshi [1 ]
Iwasaki, Hiroshi [1 ]
Takami, Masanari [1 ]
Ishimoto, Yuyu [1 ]
Nagata, Keiji [1 ]
Yamada, Hiroshi [1 ]
机构
[1] Wakayama Med Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Wakayama, Japan
来源
CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY | 2024年 / 37卷 / 08期
关键词
adult spinal deformity; lateral interbody fusion; long-term outcome; short fusion; long fusion; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT; INSTRUMENT; PARAMETERS; ALIGNMENT;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0000000000001583
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To investigate long-term outcomes after short or long fusion for adult spinal deformity using lateral interbody fusion. Summary of Background Data: Lateral interbody fusion is commonly used in adult spinal deformity surgery. Favorable short-term outcomes have been reported, but not long-term outcomes. Lateral interbody fusion with strong ability to correct deformity may allow the selection of short fusion techniques. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed adults who underwent this surgery with a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. Short fusion with the uppermost instrumented vertebra in the lumbar spine was performed in patients without degenerative changes at the thoracolumbar junction (S-group); others underwent long fusion with the uppermost instrumented vertebra in the thoracic spine (L-group). We assessed radiographic and clinical outcomes. Results: Short fusion was performed in 29 of 54 patients. One patient per group required revision surgery. Of the remainder, with similar preoperative characteristics and deformity correction between groups, correction loss (pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis, P=0.003; pelvic tilt, P=0.005; sagittal vertical axis, P<0.001) occurred within 2 years postoperatively in the S-group, and sagittal vertical axis continued to increase until the 5-year follow-up (P=0.021). Although there was a significant change in Oswestry disability index in the S-group (P=0.031) and self-image of Scoliosis Research Society 22r score in both groups (P=0.045 and 0.02) from 2- to 5-year follow-up, minimum clinically important differences were not reached. At 5-year follow-up, there was a significant difference in Oswestry Disability Index (P=0.013) and Scoliosis Research Society 22r scores (function: P=0.028; pain: P=0.003; subtotal: P=0.006) between the groups, but satisfaction scores were comparable and Oswestry Disability Index score (29.8%) in the S-group indicated moderate disability. Conclusions: Health-related quality of life was maintained between 2- and 5-year follow-up in both groups. Short fusion may be an option for patients without degenerative changes at the thoracolumbar junction.Level of Evidence:III
引用
收藏
页码:E371 / E376
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Lateral interbody fusion combined with open posterior surgery for adult spinal deformity
    Strom, Russell G.
    Bae, Junseok
    Mizutani, Jun
    Valone, Frank, III
    Ames, Christopher P.
    Deviren, Vedat
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2016, 25 (06) : 697 - 705
  • [2] Limited Cost Benefit of Lateral Interbody Fusion for Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery
    Yamamoto, Tatsuya
    Yagi, Mitsuru
    Suzuki, Satoshi
    Nori, Satoshi
    Tsuji, Osahiko
    Nagoshi, Narihito
    Okada, Eijiro
    Fujita, Nobuyuki
    Nakamura, Masaya
    Matsumoto, Morio
    Watanabe, Kota
    SPINE, 2021, 46 (01) : 48 - 53
  • [3] Long-term Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Adult Scoliosis
    Changoor, Stuart
    Faloon, Michael J.
    Dunn, Conor J.
    Sahai, Nikhil
    Issa, Kimona
    Moore, Jeffrey
    Sinha, Kumar
    Hwang, Ki Soo
    Emami, Arash
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2020, 45 (03) : E122 - E127
  • [4] Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Corrective Surgery on Adult Spinal Deformity Patients: Comparison of Short and Long Fusion
    Ono, Koichiro
    Ohmori, Kazuo
    Hori, Takeshi
    ADVANCES IN ORTHOPEDICS, 2019, 2019
  • [5] Surgical Outcomes of Multilevel Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity: A Comparative Clinical Study
    Iwamae, Masayoshi
    Matsumura, Akira
    Namikawa, Takashi
    Kato, Minori
    Hori, Yusuke
    Yabu, Akito
    Sawada, Yuta
    Hidaka, Noriaki
    Nakamura, Hiroaki
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 14 (04) : 421 - 429
  • [6] Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy Versus Multilevel Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Adult Spinal Deformity Trends, Outcomes, and Cost
    Chi, Jialun
    Zhang, Yi
    Fontaine, Andrew
    Zhang, Zhichang
    Wang, Jesse
    Labaran, Lawal
    Li, Xudong
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2024, 37 (05): : E192 - E200
  • [7] Mini-Open Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Combined with Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Corrective Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity
    Lee, Chong-Suh
    Park, Se-Jun
    Chung, Sung-Soo
    Lee, Jun-Young
    Yum, Tae-Hoon
    Shin, Seong-Kee
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 10 (06) : 1023 - 1032
  • [8] Correction of marked sagittal deformity with circumferential minimally invasive surgery using oblique lateral interbody fusion in adult spinal deformity
    Seung Won Park
    Myeong Jin Ko
    Young Baeg Kim
    Jean Charles Le Huec
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15
  • [9] Correction of marked sagittal deformity with circumferential minimally invasive surgery using oblique lateral interbody fusion in adult spinal deformity
    Park, Seung Won
    Ko, Myeong Jin
    Kim, Young Baeg
    Le Huec, Jean Charles
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [10] Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion/Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion) versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery in Spinal Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review
    Bamps, Sven
    Raymaekers, Vincent
    Roosen, Gert
    Put, Eric
    Vanvolsem, Steven
    Achahbar, Salah-Eddine
    Meeuws, Sacha
    Wissels, Maarten
    Plazier, Mark
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 171 : 10 - 18