Machine Learning-Based Identification of Risk Factors of Keratoconus Progression Using Raw Corneal Tomography Data

被引:0
|
作者
Cohen-Tayar, Yamit [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cohen, Hadar [3 ]
Key, Dor [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tiosano, Alon [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rozanes, Eliane [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Livny, Eitan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bahar, Irit [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nahum, Yoav [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Beilinson Med Ctr, Rabin Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[2] Felsenstein Med Res Ctr, Lab Eye Res, Petah Tiqwa, Israel
[3] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
cross-linking; keratoconus; machine learning; tomography; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/ICO.0000000000003669
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose:The purpose of this study was to identify early indicators of keratoconus progression in Pentacam data using machine learning (ML) techniques.Methods:A retrospective Pentacam tabular data set was created by retrieving 11,760 tomography tests performed in patients with keratoconus. Data for eyes labeled unstable based on their referral for cross-linking were differentiated from data for eyes labeled stable and not referred for follow-up procedures. A boosted decision tree was trained on the final data set using a cross-validation method.Results:The final labeled data set included 1218 tomography tests. Training a ML model on a single test for each eye did not accurately predict disease progression, as indicated by the mean receiver-operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.59 +/- 0.1, with precision of 0.27, recall of 0.3, and F1 score of 0.28. Training on serial tests for each eye included 819 tomography scans and yielded good prognostic abilities: a receiver-operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.75 +/- 0.07, precision of 0.32, recall of 0.67, and F1 score of 0.43. In addition, 4 of the 55 Pentacam raw data parameters predominantly used the algorithm decision: age, central keratoconus index, Rs B, and D10 mm pachy.Conclusions:This study revealed specific dominant parameters attributing to the classification of stability, which are not routinely assessed in determining progression in common practice. Using ML techniques, keratoconus deterioration was evaluated algorithmically with training on multiple tests, yet was not predicted by a single tomography test. Hence, our study highlights novel factors to the current consideration of cross-linking referral and may serve as a supportive tool for clinicians.
引用
收藏
页码:605 / 612
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Detecting Keratoconus From Corneal Imaging Data Using Machine Learning
    Lavric, Alexandru
    Popa, Valentin
    Takahashi, Hidenori
    Yousefi, Siamak
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 149113 - 149121
  • [2] Machine learning methods to identify risk factors for corneal graft rejection in keratoconus
    Feizi, Sepehr
    Javadi, Mohammad Ali
    Bayat, Kia
    Arzaghi, Mohammadreza
    Rahdar, Amir
    Ahmadi, Mohammad Javad
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [3] Development of a Machine Learning model to detect Keratoconus using Corneal Biomechanics data
    Civiero, Gabriele
    Naroo, Shehzad
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2023, 64 (08)
  • [4] Risk factors for progression following corneal collagen crosslinking in keratoconus
    Ayhan Sağlık
    Gökçen Özcan
    Ömür Uçakhan
    International Ophthalmology, 2021, 41 : 3443 - 3449
  • [5] Risk factors for progression following corneal collagen crosslinking in keratoconus
    Saglik, Ayhan
    Ozcan, Gokcen
    Ucakhan, Omur
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 41 (10) : 3443 - 3449
  • [6] Using Machine Learning to Monitor Keratoconus Progression
    Ahuja, Abhimanyu S.
    Halperin, Lawrence S.
    JAMA OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 137 (12) : 1467 - 1468
  • [7] Machine learning-based identification of the risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults
    Hoshijima, Hiroshi
    Miyazaki, Tomo
    Mitsui, Yuto
    Omachi, Shinichiro
    Yamauchi, Masanori
    Mizuta, Kentaro
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (08):
  • [8] Identification of Risk Factors and Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Knee Osteoarthritis Patients
    Kokkotis, Christos
    Moustakidis, Serafeim
    Giakas, Giannis
    Tsaopoulos, Dimitrios
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (19):
  • [9] Machine learning-based orthotropic stiffness identification using guided wavefield data
    Orta, Adil Han
    De Boer, Jasper
    Kersemans, Mathias
    Vens, Celine
    Van Den Abeele, Koen
    MEASUREMENT, 2023, 214
  • [10] A Machine Learning-Based Model for Flight Turbulence Identification Using LiDAR Data
    Zhuang, Zibo
    Zhang, Hui
    Chan, Pak-Wai
    Tai, Hongda
    Deng, Zheng
    ATMOSPHERE, 2023, 14 (05)