Factors Affecting Implant Length in Primary Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement

被引:0
|
作者
Miller, Jake A. [1 ]
Hammad, Muhammed [2 ]
Amini, Eliad [3 ]
Andrianne, Robert [4 ]
Burnett, Arthur L. [5 ]
Gross, Kelli [6 ]
Gross, Martin S. [7 ]
Hatzichristodoulou, Georgios [8 ]
Hotaling, James [9 ]
Hsieh, Tung-Chin [10 ,11 ]
Jenkins, Lawrence C. [12 ]
Jones, James M. [13 ]
Lentz, Aaron [14 ]
Levy, Jason [15 ]
Modgil, Vaibhav [16 ]
Osmonov, Daniar [17 ]
Park, Sung Hun [18 ]
Pearce, Ian [18 ]
Perito, Paul [18 ]
Sadeghi-Nejad, Hossein [18 ]
Sempels, Maxime [18 ]
Simhan, Jay [18 ]
Suarez-Sarmiento Jr, Alfredo [18 ]
van Renterghem, Koenraad [18 ]
Warner, J. Nicholas [18 ]
Yafi, Faysal A. [18 ]
Ziegelmann, Matthew [18 ]
Barham, David W. [18 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, 101 City Dr South,Pavill 3, Orange, CA 92868 USA
[2] Univ Hosp Liege, Dept Urol, Liege, Belgium
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Urol, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Univ Utah, Dept Surg, Salt Lake City, CA USA
[5] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Sect Urol, Lebanon, NH USA
[6] Martha Maria Hosp Nuremburg, Dept Urol, Nurnberg, Germany
[7] Univ Calif San Diego, Dept Urol, San Diego, CA USA
[8] Tulane Sch Med, Dept Urol, New Orleans, LA USA
[9] Duke Univ, Dept Urol, Durham, NC USA
[10] Manchester Univ NHS Fdn Trust, Manchester Androl Ctr, Manchester, England
[11] Univ Hosp Schleswig Holstein, Dept Urol, Kiel, Germany
[12] Sewum Prosthet Urol, Seoul, South Korea
[13] Perito Urol, Coral Gables, FL USA
[14] NYU, Dept Urol, New York, NY USA
[15] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[16] Jessa Hosp, Dept Urol, Hasselt, Belgium
[17] Mayo Clin, Dept Urol, Rochester, MN USA
[18] Brooke Army Med Ctr, Dept Surg, Urol Sect, San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; OUTCOMES; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2024.06.068
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate predictors of implant length for men undergoing primary IPP placement. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was performed for men undergoing primary IPP placement at 16 high-volume surgical centers. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative approach, and implanted cylinder and rear-tip extender length were recorded. Associations between potential preoperative and intraoperative predictors of total device length were tested using non-parametric correlation and Kruskal-Wallis tests, followed by multiple regression. Results: Of 3951 men undergoing primary IPP placement from July 2016 to July 2021, the median implant length was 20 cm (IQR: 19-22). Shorter implant length was associated with increasing age in years (beta = -0.01, P = .009), Asian ethnicity (beta = -2.34, P = .008), history of radical prostatectomy (beta = -0.35, P = .001), and use of an infrapubic surgical approach (beta = -1.02, P <.001). Black or African American ethnicity was associated with the implantation of longer devices (beta = 0.35, P <.001). No significant associations were recorded with BMI, history of intracavernosal injections, diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, radiation therapy, Peyronie's disease, priapism, or cavernosal dilation technique. Conclusion: The length of an implanted penile prosthesis was found to be associated with preoperative and intraoperative factors including history of radical prostatectomy and operative approach. The knowledge of these associations may assist in the preoperative counseling of patients receiving IPP and help create accurate postoperative expectations.
引用
收藏
页码:240 / 244
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Editorial Comment on "Factors Affecting Implant Length in Primary Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement"
    Alkassis, Marwan
    Raheem, Omer
    UROLOGY, 2024, 193
  • [2] Reply to Editorial Comment on "Factors Affecting Implant Length in Primary Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Placement"
    Miller, Jake A.
    Gross, Martin S.
    Simhan, Jay
    Yafi, Faysal A.
    Barham, David W.
    UROLOGY, 2024, 193 : 247 - 248
  • [3] PENILE LENGTH AFTER INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS IMPLANT: DOES IT REALLY MATTER?
    Ricapito, Anna
    Rubino, Matteo
    Falagario, Ugo G.
    Mancini, Vito
    Busetto, GianMaria
    Cormio, Luigi
    Carrieri, Giuseppe
    Bettocchi, Carlo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E975 - E975
  • [4] A Review of Factors Affecting Patient Satisfaction With Inflatable Penile Prosthesis
    Shah, Tejash
    Wang, Run
    SEXUAL MEDICINE REVIEWS, 2021, 9 (02) : 350 - 357
  • [5] Subcutaneous Placement of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Reservoirs
    Garber, Bruce B.
    Bickell, Michael
    UROLOGY, 2016, 88 : 93 - 95
  • [6] A STREAMLINE APPROACH TO INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS PLACEMENT
    Weinberg, A.
    Pagano, M.
    Valenzuela, R.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (05): : S70 - S70
  • [7] SCROTAL PLACEMENT OF RESERVOIR OF INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS
    FEIN, RL
    UROLOGY, 1986, 28 (05) : 430 - 431
  • [8] SUBCUTANEOUS PLACEMENT OF INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS RESERVOIRS
    Garber, B.
    Bickell, M.
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2016, 13 (05): : S69 - S70
  • [9] EPIGASTRIC PLACEMENT OF RESERVOIR FOR INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS
    RIEMENSCHNEIDER, HW
    UROLOGY, 1981, 17 (01) : 79 - 81
  • [10] SCROTAL PLACEMENT OF RESERVOIR OF INFLATABLE PENILE PROSTHESIS
    FEIN, RL
    UROLOGY, 1988, : 26 - 27