Assessing urban river restoration design using an integrated economic, social and environmental index

被引:0
|
作者
Guimaraes, Luciana Fernandes [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Verol, Aline Pires [2 ]
Miguez, Marcelo Gomes [3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Programa Doutorado Engn Ambiental DEAMB, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Programa Posgrad Arquitetura PROARQ, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio De Janeiro, Programa Engn Civil PEC, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Programa Engn Ambiental PEA, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, Programa Engn Urbana PEU, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
关键词
Flood mitigation; Urban river restoration; Multiple benefits; Multicriteria assessment; I-SEER; FLOOD-RISK; CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE; GREY INFRASTRUCTURE; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.144568
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban river restoration is a potential approach to integrate existing urban drainage network with parks that create blue-green corridors along urban riverbanks. However, since cities have limited open spaces, river restoration must be approached in a specific way within the built environment, requiring an effective compromise that balances environmental, social, and economic priorities. In this context, this paper proposes the Integrated Socio-Economic and Environmental Ranking Index for Design Evaluation (I-SEER), using a multicriteria approach to assess the benefits derived from river restoration design alternatives. The Acari River Watershed, located in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, was selected as a case study to test this approach with two design alternatives: one focused on grey infrastructure and the other on a hybrid blue-green-grey system. The I-SEER indicated that the hybrid blue-green-grey system has greater potential to deliver multiple benefits compared to the design focused solely on grey infrastructure. Therefore, the proposed multicriteria assessment allows for the structuring of potential benefits for each design alternative and provides decision-makers with insights into their respective feasibility.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessing the comprehensive restoration of an urban river: An integrated application of contingent valuation in Shanghai, China
    Zhao, Jun
    Liu, Qiuxia
    Lin, Liqing
    Lv, Huafang
    Wang, Yao
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 458 : 517 - 526
  • [2] Measuring the economic value of urban river restoration
    Dai, Dan
    Brouwer, Roy
    Lei, Kun
    ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2021, 190
  • [3] Urban River Design: A River Restoration Case Study
    Halajova, Denisa
    Halaj, Peter
    Macura, Viliam
    Skrinar, Andrej
    3RD WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING, ARCHITECTURE, URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM (WMCAUS 2018), 2019, 471
  • [4] River Restoration: Political, Social, and Economic Perspectives
    Canfield, Katherine N.
    SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 2022, 35 (07) : 813 - 815
  • [5] Assessing the potential of digital technology: an integrated measurement of economic, environmental, and social performance
    Li, Lianqing
    Boussemart, Jean-Philippe
    Shen, Zhiyang
    Vardanyan, Michael
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2025,
  • [6] Environmental and Economic Consideration on Restoration of River Flow Regime
    Tamai, Nobuyuki
    Shirakawa, Naoki
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL YELLOW RIVER FORUM ON RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT, VOL III, 2003, : 442 - 446
  • [7] Carbon capture and utilisation (CCU) solutions: Assessing environmental, economic, and social impacts using a new integrated methodology
    Maselli, Gabriella
    Oliva, Giuseppina
    Nestico, Antonio
    Belgiorno, Vincenzo
    Naddeo, Vincenzo
    Zarra, Tiziano
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 948
  • [9] Environmental considerations for assessing dam removal alternatives for river restoration
    Shuman, JR
    REGULATED RIVERS-RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT, 1995, 11 (3-4): : 249 - 261
  • [10] Application of integrated urban river management strategy in Ejingshui River ecological restoration
    Tang Y.
    Ren X.
    Kong L.
    Yan Y.
    Water Resources Protection, 2021, 37 (06) : 88 - 93