Exploring service users' and healthcare professionals' experience of digital and face-to-face Health Checks in England: a qualitative study

被引:0
|
作者
Forte, Chloe [1 ]
Grey, Elisabeth B. [1 ]
Jessiman, Patricia [1 ]
Mcleod, Hugh [1 ,2 ]
Salway, Ruth [1 ]
Sillero-Rejon, Carlos [1 ,2 ]
Harkes, Rebecca [3 ]
Stokes, Paul [3 ]
De Vocht, Frank [1 ,2 ]
Campbell, Rona [1 ,2 ]
Jago, Russell [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, England
[2] NIHR ARC West, Bristol, England
[3] London Borough Southwark, Publ Hlth, London, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2025年 / 15卷 / 03期
关键词
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; eHealth; Health Services Accessibility; Quality in healthcare; PATIENT COMMUNICATION;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090492
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction In England, eligible adults aged 40-74 years are invited to attend a face-to-face (F2F) NHS Health Check appointment every 5 years. A digital version of the Health Check was introduced by a local authority as an alternative for those hesitant or less able to attend an F2F appointment.Objectives This qualitative study aimed to understand service users' (SUs) and healthcare professionals' (HCPs) experiences and opinions of F2F Health Checks and digital Health Checks (DHC), identify barriers and facilitators of the F2F Health Check and DHC pathways, and recommend potential improvements.Design This is a qualitative study, involving interviews with a purposive sample of participants.Participants and setting A purposive sample of 30 SUs and 8 HCPs were recruited by an external market service company in the London Borough of Southwark.Methods Semistructured interviews were conducted, which included questions on understanding why SUs chose a type of Health Check, their experiences of the service and suggestions for improvement. HCP interviews covered HCP experiences of providing both services, including any impact on workload. The Framework method of thematic analysis was used to analyse the data.Results SUs identified benefits of the DHC service including its convenience, ease of use and access. Both SUs and HCPs acknowledged the limitations of the DHC, including self-reporting physical measures (eg, blood pressure and cholesterol levels) or difficulties going elsewhere to measure them, and the lack of opportunity to discuss health with a professional. SUs and HCPs both noted the lack of available appointments and time constraints as barriers associated with the F2F service.Conclusions Both HCPs and SUs perceive that in its current form, the DHC has benefits and barriers to its use. If these are adequately addressed, the DHC may help address the demand and pressure within General Practitioner (GP) clinics.Trial registration number This study was registered on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/y87zt/.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Face-to-Face and Distance Education Modalities in the Training of Healthcare Professionals: A Quasi-Experimental Study
    Souza, Carmem L. E.
    Mattos, Luciana B.
    Stein, Airton T.
    Rosario, Pedro
    Magalhaes, Cleidilene R.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 9
  • [2] Healthcare access for asylum seekers and refugees in England: a mixed methods study exploring service users' and health care professionals' awareness
    Tomkow, Louise J.
    Kang, Cara Pippa
    Farrington, Rebecca
    Wiggans, Ruth E.
    Wilson, Rebecca J.
    Pushkar, Piyush
    Tickell-Painter, Maya C.
    Lee, Alice R.
    Whitehouse, Emily R.
    Mahmood, Nadia G.
    Lawton, Katie
    Lee, Ellen C.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 30 (03): : 556 - 561
  • [3] From face-to-face to screen-to-screen: exploring the multifaceted dimensions of digital mental health care
    Maqsood, Aneela
    Gul, Seema
    Zahra, Touseef
    Noureen, Nazia
    Khattak, Amira
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 15
  • [4] Experiences of patients and healthcare professionals of NHS cardiovascular health checks: a qualitative study
    Riley, R.
    Coghill, N.
    Montgomery, A.
    Feder, G.
    Horwood, J.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 38 (03) : 543 - 551
  • [5] A randomised controlled study of face-to-face versus internet-based teaching of CBT skills for healthcare professionals in Sudan
    Ismail, Ahmed
    Rakovshik, Sarah
    Abdelrahim, Sarah
    BJPSYCH INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 18 (02) : E7
  • [6] Blended Digital and Face-to-Face Care for First-Episode Psychosis Treatment in Young People: Qualitative Study
    Valentine, Lee
    McEnery, Carla
    Bell, Imogen
    O'Sullivan, Shaunagh
    Pryor, Ingrid
    Gleeson, John
    Bendall, Sarah
    Alvarez-Jimenez, Mario
    JMIR MENTAL HEALTH, 2020, 7 (07):
  • [7] Patients' User Experience of a Blended Face-to-Face and Web-Based Smoking Cessation Treatment: Qualitative Study
    Siemer, Lutz
    Ben Allouch, Somaya
    Pieterse, Marcel E.
    Brusse-Keizer, Marjolein
    Sanderman, Robbert
    Postel, Marloes G.
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2020, 4 (06)
  • [8] A qualitative study exploring mental health professionals' perspectives, opinions, and attitudes on the state of service users' rights
    Eiroa-Orosa, Francisco Jose
    Pradillo-Caimari, Cristina
    IRISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [9] Healthcare professionals' perceptions of digital health competence: A qualitative descriptive study
    Jarva, Erika
    Oikarinen, Anne
    Andersson, Janicke
    Tuomikoski, Anna-Maria
    Kaariainen, Maria
    Merilainen, Merja
    Mikkonen, Kristina
    NURSING OPEN, 2022, 9 (02): : 1379 - 1393
  • [10] Newly Arrived Migrant Women's Experience of Maternity Health Information: A Face-to-Face Questionnaire Study in Norway
    Bains, Sukhjeet
    Sundby, Johanne
    Lindskog, Benedikte, V
    Vangen, Siri
    Sorbye, Ingvil K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (14)