Multielectrode catheter-based pulsed electric field vs. cryoballoon for atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:2
|
作者
Vetta, Giampaolo [1 ,2 ]
Della Rocca, Domenico Giovanni [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Parlavecchio, Antonio [4 ]
Magnocavallo, Michele [2 ,5 ]
Sorgente, Antonio [1 ]
Pannone, Luigi [1 ]
Del Monte, Alvise [1 ]
Almorad, Alexandre [1 ]
Sieira, Juan [1 ]
Marcon, Lorenzo [1 ]
Doundoulakis, Ioannis [1 ]
Mohanty, Sanghamitra [3 ]
Audiat, Charles [1 ]
Nakasone, Kazutaka [1 ]
Bala, Gezim [1 ]
Stroker, Erwin [1 ]
Combes, Stephane [6 ]
Overeinder, Ingrid [1 ]
Bianchi, Stefano [5 ]
Palmisano, Pietro [7 ]
Rossi, Pietro [5 ]
Boveda, Serge [6 ]
La Meir, Marc [1 ]
Natale, Andrea [3 ]
Sarkozy, Andrea [1 ]
de Asmundis, Carlo [1 ]
Chierchia, Gian-Battista [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Brussel, Univ Ziekenhuis Brussel, Heart Rhythm Management Ctr, Postgrad Program Cardiac Electrophysiol & Pacing,E, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Mediterranean Consortium Arrhythmia Res MediCAR, Rome, Italy
[3] St Davids Med Ctr, Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Inst, Austin, TX 78705 USA
[4] Univ Messina, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Cardiol Unit, Messina, Italy
[5] Osped Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina Gemelli Isol, Arrhythmol Unit, Rome, Italy
[6] Clin Pasteur, Heart Rhythm Dept, Toulouse, France
[7] Card G Panico Hosp, Cardiol Unit, Tricase, Italy
来源
EUROPACE | 2024年 / 26卷 / 12期
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Ablation; Pulmonary vein isolation; Pulsed field ablation; Cryoballoon ablation; Catheter ablation; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euae293
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is an innovative technology recently adopted for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Preclinical and clinical studies have reported a remarkable safety profile, as a result of its tissue-specific effect targeting cardiomyocytes and sparing adjacent tissues. Single-shot pentaspline system was the first PFA device to receive regulatory approval. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of PFA with the single-shot pentaspline system vs. currently available second-/third-/fourth-generation cryoballoon ablation (CRYO) technologies. Methods and results We systematically searched electronic databases for studies focusing on AF ablation employing the PFA single-shot pentaspline system or second-/third-/fourth-generation CRYO technologies. The primary endpoints were acute procedural success assessed on a vein and patient basis. Safety endpoints included overall periprocedural complications and major periprocedural complications. We also compared procedural, fluoroscopy times, and freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATs) at follow-up (secondary endpoints). Twenty and 70 studies were included for PFA and CRYO, respectively. Pulsed field ablation demonstrated greater acute procedural success on a vein basis (99.9% vs. 99.1%; P < 0.001), as well as per patient (99.5% vs. 98.4%; P < 0.001). Pulsed field ablation yielded lower overall periprocedural complications (3.1% vs. 5.6%; P < 0.001), shorter procedural time (75.9 min vs. 105.6 min; P < 0.001), and fluoroscopy time (14.2 min vs. 18.9 min; P < 0.001) compared with CRYO. No differences were found for major periprocedural complications (1.2% vs. 1.0%; P = 0.46) and freedom from ATs at 1 year (82.3% vs. 80.3%; log-rank P = 0.61). Conclusion Pulsed field ablation contributed to higher acute procedural success and safety compared with CRYO. No statistically significant differences in AT recurrence at 1-year follow-up were observed.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative effectiveness of pulsed field ablation and cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Freitas, M.
    Lucena, L.
    Guida, C.
    Bulhoes, E.
    Vieira, R.
    Donadon, I.
    Barbalho, M.
    Vilela, M.
    Cazeiro, D.
    Brito, D.
    Dantas, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45
  • [2] Comparative effectiveness of pulsed field ablation and cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Freitas, M.
    Lucena, L.
    Guida, C.
    Bulhoes, E.
    Vieira, R.
    Donadon, I
    Barbalho, M.
    Vilela, M.
    Cazeiro, D.
    Brito, D.
    Dantas, J.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45
  • [3] Pulsed-field ablation versus radiofrequency or cryoballoon thermal ablation in atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kaddoura, Rasha
    Abushanab, Dina
    Asaad, Nidal
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2025,
  • [4] Cryoballoon vs. laser balloon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
    Sun, Xiaochi
    Zhao, Shenyu
    Yu, Simin
    Cui, Kaijun
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 10
  • [5] Effects of Hot Balloon vs. Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
    Peng, Xinyi
    Liu, Xiao
    Tian, Hongbo
    Chen, Yu
    Li, Xuexun
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [6] Multielectrode catheter-based pulsed field ablation of persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation
    Della Rocca, Domenico G.
    Sorgente, Antonio
    Pannone, Luigi
    Cespon-Fernandez, Maria
    Vetta, Giampaolo
    Almorad, Alexandre
    Bala, Gezim
    Del Monte, Alvise
    Stroker, Erwin
    Sieira, Juan
    Doundoulakis, Ioannis
    Mouram, Sahar
    Audiat, Charles
    Monaco, Cinzia
    Mohanty, Sanghamitra
    Scacciavillani, Roberto
    Marcon, Lorenzo
    Nakasone, Kazutaka
    Zaher, Wael
    Overeinder, Ingrid
    Boveda, Serge
    La Meir, Mark
    Natale, Andrea
    Sarkozy, Andrea
    de Asmundis, Carlo
    Chierchia, Gian-Battista
    EUROPACE, 2024, 26 (10):
  • [7] CRYOBALLOON ABLATION FOR THE TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Patel, Nirav
    Shenoy, Abhishek
    Baker, William
    Makaryus, Amgad
    El-Sherif, Nabil
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2018, 71 (11) : 524 - 524
  • [8] Novel vs established cryoballoon ablation system for atrial fibrillation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    de Lavallaz, Jeanne du Fay
    Knecht, Sven
    Reichlin, Tobias
    Krisai, Philipp
    Mannhart, Diego
    Serban, Teodor
    Roten, Laurent
    Arnet, Rebecca
    Isenegger, Corinne
    Minder, Judith
    Jordan, Fabian
    Sticherling, Christian
    Hne, Michael Ku euro
    Badertscher, Patrick
    HEART RHYTHM O2, 2025, 6 (01): : 21 - 31
  • [9] A systematic review and meta-analysis of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation
    Wang, Peng
    He, Wuyang
    Li, Chunqiu
    Xiang, Tingting
    Yang, Qiaoyun
    Chen, Qingwei
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (10) : 10542 - 10555
  • [10] PULSED FIELD ABLATION VERSUS THERMAL ABLATION FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Rivera, Andre
    Braga, Marcelo
    Bezerra, Gabriel
    Felix, Nicole S.
    Costa, Thomaz
    Clemente, Mariana
    Fernandes, Amanda
    Ternes, Caique M. P.
    Costa Fernandes Filho, Gilson M.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 228 - 228