Ultrashort Oncologic Whole-Body [18F]FDG Patlak Imaging Using LAFOV PET

被引:0
|
作者
van Sluis, Joyce [1 ]
van Snick, Johannes H. [1 ]
Glaudemans, Andor W. J. M. [1 ]
Slart, Riemer H. J. A. [1 ]
Noordzij, Walter [1 ]
Brouwers, Adrienne H. [1 ]
Dierckx, Rudi A. J. O. [1 ]
Lammertsma, Adriaan A. [1 ]
Tsoumpas, Charalampos [1 ]
Boellaard, Ronald [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Radiol & Nucl Med, Locat VUmc, Med Ctr, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
ultrashort scan duration; Patlak; parametric PET; LAFOV; PET/CT; FDG-PET; THERAPY;
D O I
10.2967/jnumed.124.267784
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Methods to shorten [F-18]FDG Patlak PET imaging procedures ranging from 65-90 to 20-30 min after injection, using a population-averaged input function (PIF) scaled to patient-specific image-derived input function (IDIF) values, were recently evaluated. The aim of the present study was to explore the feasibility of ultrashort 10-min [F-18]FDG Patlak imaging at 55-65 min after injection using a PIF combined with direct Patlak reconstructions to provide reliable quantitative accuracy of lung tumor uptake, compared with a full-duration 65-min acquisition using an IDIF. Methods: Patients underwent a 65-min dynamic PET acquisition on a long-axial-field-of-view (LAFOV) Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT scanner. Subsequently, direct Patlak reconstructions and image-based (with reconstructed dynamic images) Patlak analyses were performed using both the IDIF (time to relative kinetic equilibrium between blood and tissue concentration (t*) = 30 min) and a scaled PIF at 30-60 min after injection. Next, direct Patlak reconstructions were performed on the system console using only the last 10 min of the acquisition, that is, from 55 to 65 min after injection, and a scaled PIF using maximum crystal ring difference settings of both 85 and 322. Tumor lesion and healthy-tissue uptake was quantified and compared between the differently obtained parametric images to assess quantitative accuracy. Results: Good agreement was obtained between direct- and image-based Patlak analyses using the IDIF (t* = 30 min) and scaled PIF at 30-60 min after injection, performed using the different approaches, with no more than 8.8% deviation in tumor influx rate value (K-i ) (mean difference ranging from -0.0022 to 0.0018 mL/[min x g]). When direct Patlak reconstruction was performed on the system console, excellent agreement was found between the use of a scaled PIF at 30-60 min after injection versus 55-65 min after injection, with 2.4% deviation in tumor K-i (median difference, -0.0018 mL/[min x g]; range, -0.0047 to 0.0036 mL/[min x g]). For different maximum crystal ring difference settings using the scan time interval of 55-65 min after injection, only a 0.5% difference (median difference, 0.0000 mL/[min x g]; range, -0.0004 to 0.0013 mL/[min x g]) in tumor K-i was found. Conclusion: Ultrashort whole-body [F-18]FDG Patlak imaging is feasible on an LAFOV Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system without loss of quantitative accuracy to assess lung tumor uptake compared with a full-duration 65-min acquisition. The ultrashort 10-min direct Patlak reconstruction with PIF allows for its implementation in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:1652 / 1657
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ultra-short duration whole body [18F]FDG Patlak imaging using LAFOV PET
    Van Sluis, Joyce
    van Snick, Paul
    Glaudemans, Andor
    Slart, Riemer
    Noordzij, Walter
    Brouwers, Adrienne
    Dierckx, Rudi
    Lammertsma, Adriaan
    Tsoumpas, Charalampos
    Boellaard, Ronald
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2024, 65
  • [2] Direct versus indirect parametric whole body [18F]FDG Patlak imaging using a LAFOV PET/CT system
    van Sluis, J.
    Providencia, L.
    van Snick, J. H.
    Glaudemans, A. W. J. M.
    Slart, R. H. J. A.
    Dierckx, R. A. J. O.
    Tsoumpas, C.
    Boellaard, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2023, 50 (SUPPL 1) : S160 - S160
  • [3] Optimization of Injected Activity for Whole-Body [18F]FDG PET/CT Imaging
    Hart, Alexander
    Bazalova-Carter, Magdalena
    Rahmim, Arman
    Uribe, Carlos
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 62
  • [4] Comparison of Whole-Body 18F FDG PET/MR Imaging and Whole-Body 18F FDG PET/CT in Terms of Lesion Detection and Radiation Dose in Patients with Breast Cancer
    Melsaether, Amy N.
    Raad, Roy A.
    Pujara, Akshat C.
    Ponzo, Fabio D.
    Pysarenko, Kristine M.
    Jhaveri, Komal
    Babb, James S.
    Sigmund, Eric E.
    Kim, Sungheon G.
    Moy, Linda A.
    RADIOLOGY, 2016, 281 (01) : 193 - 202
  • [5] Whole-Body 18F-FDG PET/CT Patlak Parametric Imaging of Hepatic Alveolar Echinococcosis
    Maurer, Alexander
    Kotasidis, Fotis
    Deibel, Ansgar
    Burger, Irene A.
    Huellner, Martin W.
    CLINICAL NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 48 (12) : 1089 - 1090
  • [6] Does whole-body Patlak 18F-FDG PET imaging improve lesion detectability in clinical oncology?
    Guillaume Fahrni
    Nicolas A. Karakatsanis
    Giulia Di Domenicantonio
    Valentina Garibotto
    Habib Zaidi
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 4812 - 4821
  • [7] Does whole-body Patlak 18F-FDG PET imaging improve lesion detectability in clinical oncology?
    Fahrni, Guillaume
    Karakatsanis, Nicolas A.
    Di Domenicantonio, Giulia
    Garibotto, Valentina
    Zaidi, Habib
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (09) : 4812 - 4821
  • [8] Whole-body [18F]FDG PET in the management of metastatic brain tumours
    Kim, DG
    Kim, CY
    Paek, SH
    Lee, DS
    Chung, JK
    Jung, HW
    Cho, BK
    ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1998, 140 (07) : 665 - 673
  • [9] Whole-Body [18F]FDG PET in the Management of Metastatic Brain Tumours
    D. G. Kim
    C.-Y. Kim
    S. H. Paek
    D. S. Lee
    J.-K. Chung
    H.-W. Jung
    B.-K. Cho
    Acta Neurochirurgica, 1998, 140 : 665 - 674
  • [10] Whole-Body [18F]FDG-PET/MRI vs. [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Malignant Melanoma
    Berzaczy, Dominik
    Fueger, Barbara
    Hoeller, Christoph
    Haug, Alexander R.
    Staudenherz, Anton
    Berzaczy, Gundula
    Weber, Michael
    Mayerhoefer, Marius E.
    MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 22 (03) : 739 - 744