Optimizing analgesia for endometrial biopsy: A prospective, randomized comparative study

被引:0
|
作者
Coskun, Enes Serhat [1 ]
Yeniocak, Ali Selcuk [2 ]
Bacak, Havva Betul [3 ]
Salman, Suleyman [3 ]
机构
[1] Simav Doc Dr Ismail Karakuyu City Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kutahya, Turkiye
[2] Basaksehir Cam & Sakura City Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Univ Hlth Sci, Gaziosmanpasa Training & Res Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
EMB; endometrial biopsy; intrauterine lidocaine; pain management; paracervical block; INTRAUTERINE LIDOCAINE; PAIN RELIEF; GYNECOLOGIC PROCEDURES; PARACERVICAL-BLOCK; MANAGEMENT; ANESTHESIA; INSERTION; EFFICACY; SODIUM; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/jog.16148
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
AimThis prospective, randomized, observational study aimed to compare the efficacy of intrauterine lidocaine, oral dexketoprofen, cervical lidocaine spray, and paracervical block with prilocaine for pain management during outpatient endometrial biopsy (EMB). MethodsOne hundred ninety-seven women aged 18-75 undergoing EMB were randomly assigned to one of four groups: intrauterine lidocaine (n = 49), oral dexketoprofen (n = 48), cervical lidocaine spray (n = 50), or paracervical block with prilocaine (n = 50). Pain intensity was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) immediately post-procedure and at 30 min, with additional analgesia needs recorded at 60 min. Statistical analyses included Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square tests, and post hoc analysis. ResultsThe intrauterine lidocaine group had the lowest pain scores, while oral dexketoprofen had the highest (p < 0.001). Intrauterine lidocaine and paracervical block scores were significantly lower than those in the lidocaine spray and dexketoprofen groups (p < 0.001). Additional analgesia was needed in 30% of the lidocaine spray group, with none required in other groups. Severe pain (VAS >= 5.8) was more frequent in the dexketoprofen group compared to others (p < 0.001). ConclusionIntrauterine lidocaine and paracervical block are more effective than lidocaine spray and oral dexketoprofen in reducing procedural pain during EMB, highlighting the importance of appropriate analgesic selection to enhance patient comfort in office-based gynecological procedures.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Topical analgesia for endometrial biopsy - A randomized controlled trial
    Einarsson, JI
    Renao, G
    Young, AE
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 106 (01): : 128 - 130
  • [2] Comparison of lornoxicam versus tramadol analgesia for transrectal prostate biopsy: A randomized prospective study
    Olmez G.
    Kaya S.
    Aflay U.
    Sahin H.
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2008, 40 (2) : 341 - 344
  • [3] Sonohysterographic endometrial sampling and hysteroscopic endometrial biopsy: a comparative study
    Leone, F. P. G.
    Carsana, L.
    Lanzani, C.
    Vago, G.
    Ferrazzi, E.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 29 (04) : 443 - 448
  • [4] COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ENDOMETRIAL JET-WASHING TECHNIQUE AND ENDOMETRIAL BIOPSY
    ABATE, SD
    VELLIOS, F
    EDWARDS, CL
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1972, 58 (02) : 118 - &
  • [5] A prospective comparative study between manual and automated renal biopsy by randomized sampling.
    Ku, SH
    Oh, YJ
    Shin, SK
    Kim, HS
    Gi, H
    Lim, HH
    Kim, DH
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 51 (03) : 968 - 969
  • [6] A randomized prospective comparative study of general versus epidural anesthesia for transcervical hysteroscopic endometrial resection
    Goldenberg, M
    Cohen, SB
    Etchin, A
    Mashiach, S
    Seidman, DS
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 184 (03) : 273 - 276
  • [7] Analgesia with intraperitoneal instillation of sensorcaine during laparoscopic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy: Prospective randomized comparative study
    Ganpule, Arvind
    Muthu, V.
    Mishra, S. K.
    Desai, Mahesh. R.
    Mistry, D.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2007, 21 : A37 - A38
  • [8] The development and comparative effectiveness of a patient-centered prostate biopsy report: a prospective, randomized study
    Nayak, Jasmir G.
    Scalzo, Nicholas
    Chu, Alice
    Shiff, Benjamin
    Kearns, James T.
    Dy, Geolani W.
    Macleod, Liam C.
    Mossanen, Matthew
    Ellis, William J.
    Lin, Daniel W.
    Wright, Jonathan L.
    True, Lawrence D.
    Gore, John L.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2020, 23 (01) : 144 - 150
  • [9] The development and comparative effectiveness of a patient-centered prostate biopsy report: a prospective, randomized study
    Jasmir G. Nayak
    Nicholas Scalzo
    Alice Chu
    Benjamin Shiff
    James T. Kearns
    Geolani W. Dy
    Liam C. Macleod
    Matthew Mossanen
    William J. Ellis
    Daniel W. Lin
    Jonathan L. Wright
    Lawrence D. True
    John L. Gore
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2020, 23 : 144 - 150
  • [10] During Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Which Combination of Analgesia Method is Effective? A Prospective Randomized Study
    Goger, Yunus Emre
    Ecer, Gokhan
    Ozkent, Mehmet Serkan
    Kilinc, Muzaffer Tansel
    Karalezli, Giray
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL SURGERY, 2021, 8 (03): : 191 - 197