A service evaluation of the uptake and effectiveness of a digital delivery of the NHS health check service

被引:0
|
作者
Salway, Ruth [1 ]
Sillero-Rejon, Carlos [1 ,2 ]
Forte, Chloe [1 ]
Grey, Elisabeth [1 ,2 ]
Jessiman, Patricia [1 ]
McLeod, Hugh [1 ,2 ]
Harkes, Rebecca [3 ]
Stokes, Paul [4 ]
De Vocht, Frank [1 ,2 ]
Campbell, Rona [1 ]
Jago, Russell [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Populat Hlth Sci, Bristol, England
[2] NIHR ARC West, Bristol, England
[3] London Borough Southwark, Publ Hlth, London, England
[4] Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Joint Publ Hlth Dire, Prevent & Hlth Improvement, Cambridge, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 11期
关键词
eHealth; Primary Health Care; Health economics; Electronic Health Records; PREVENTION; BURDEN;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091417
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare the uptake, effectiveness and costs of a digital version of the National Health Service (NHS) Health Check (DHC) to the standard face-to-face NHS Health Check (F2F). Participants and setting A random sample of 9000 patients aged 40-74 eligible for an NHS Health Check in Southwark, England, between January and April 2023. Intervention and design The DHC was an online tool with a health assessment section, an advice and support section, and a section on how to obtain and update follow-up physical measures (blood pressure, cholesterol, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c)). 6000 patients from GP records were randomly allocated to receive a DHC invitation and 3000 to receive an F2F invitation. Those invited to DHC were able to choose F2F if they preferred. Outcomes The primary outcome was the uptake of any type of health check, either a completed F2F appointment or completion of the DHC health assessment section, along with demographics and data on appointments, medications and referrals within the study period. QRISK3 and QDiabetes risk scores were calculated. Management and operation costs were estimated for F2F and DHC pathways. Results Excluding participants who moved away or died, the DHC uptake to the health assessment section was 21% (1189/5705), with a further 3% (198/5705) choosing F2F, compared with 11% (305/2900) for F2F completion (p<0.001). The DHC uptake was lower among those from Black (14%) and Mixed (13%) compared with White (29%) ethnicities (p<0.001), and there was no evidence of higher DHC uptake among groups less likely to engage in NHS Health Checks. Of those who completed the health assessment, 60% (714) completed the support section, and 7% (84) completed the provision and updating of physical measures. Appointments, medications and referrals were lower among DHC service users than among F2F users (p<0.001). The estimated total management and operation costs for F2F were 154.80 pound per user, compared with total management and operation costs for DHC of 68.48 pound per user for health assessment only, 134.46 pound including the support section and 1479.01 pound per user with completed physical measures. Conclusions The study suggests that a choice of Health Check pathways may potentially reduce pressures on the NHS. Cholesterol and HbA1c were not generally known, and the options to obtain and update these measures require further development for the DHC to be considered a viable comparable alternative to the F2F service for estimating cardiovascular disease and diabetes risk. Strategies are still needed to reach those groups not currently engaging with NHS Health Checks. Registration This study was registered on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/y87zt.https://osf.io/y87zt
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Remote and Digital Interventions for Weight Management in the NHS: A Qualitative Evaluation & Service delivery applications
    Tellwright, Henry
    Nicholls, Wendy
    Shepherd, Karen
    Lloyd, Joanne
    Mcardle, Paul
    Devonport, Tracey
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2023, 33 : S64 - S64
  • [2] Delivery and impact of the NHS Health Check
    Summerton, Nicholas
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2018, 68 (673): : 367 - 367
  • [3] Understanding implementation and uptake in the National Health Service Health Check Programme
    Riley, V. A.
    Gidlow, C.
    Ellis, N. J.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 159 : 63 - 66
  • [4] Reality check: The identification of service gaps in the NHS
    Nwabueze, U
    TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT, 2001, 12 (06): : 757 - 771
  • [5] Uptake of NHS health check: issues in monitoring
    Riley, Victoria A.
    Gidlow, Christopher
    Ellis, Naomi J.
    PRIMARY HEALTH CARE RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 20
  • [6] NHS HEALTH ADVISORY SERVICE
    不详
    LANCET, 1984, 2 (8405): : 763 - 764
  • [7] NHS at 60 - A centrally funded health service, free at the point of delivery
    Delamothe, Tony
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7658): : 1410 - 1412
  • [8] Efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency in mental health service delivery
    Andrews, G
    AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1999, 33 (03): : 316 - 322
  • [9] Digital Mental Health in Ireland: Effectiveness and the Future of the Service
    Bamijoko-okungbaye, Abiola
    Idemudia, Erhabor Sunday
    BRAIN-BROAD RESEARCH IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 11 (02): : 57 - 71
  • [10] Uptake of the NHS Health Check programme in an urban setting
    Artac, Macide
    Dalton, Andrew R. H.
    Majeed, Azeem
    Car, Josip
    Huckvale, Kit
    Millett, Christopher
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2013, 30 (04) : 426 - 435