Addressing the Contemporary Challenges of Business Process Compliance

被引:0
|
作者
Adams, Nigel [1 ]
Augusto, Adriano [1 ]
Davern, Michael [2 ]
La Rosa, Marcello [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Comp & Informat Syst, Parkville, Australia
[2] Univ Melbourne, Fac Business & Econ, Parkville, Australia
关键词
Business process compliance; Process mining; Conformance checking; Banking; Australia;
D O I
10.1007/s12599-025-00929-3
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
The aim of business process compliance (BPC) is to ensure that business processes are executed in accordance with a prescribed set of rules. In practice, the evidence would suggest that achieving this goal is challenging. Penalties and subsequent remediation costs in the Australian banking industry amounted to over A$10bn between 2017 and 2022. The research community has identified many challenges, but the industry perspective is typically missing from that research. The study takes advantage of recent events in the Australian banking industry that saw detailed regulatory reports made public, highlighting the challenges the industry faces trying to maintain compliance. The study supplements these reports with BPC-related insights from practitioners and consultancy groups to develop an industry perspective on the challenges. Consolidating the two perspectives presents a comprehensive view of BPC's challenges and the differing emphasis that each stakeholder group places on the challenges. Process mining may provide a pathway to reconciling these different perspectives. Both the BPC literature and industry have promoted process mining's potential to address the challenges. To explore this proposition, the study details the features of representative commercial process mining software and then maps these features to the challenges. The resultant conceptual map is used to analyze known and novel BPC challenges. It outlines the limitations that must be addressed, from both a research and industry perspective, to maintain and improve compliance.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and challenges ahead
    Mustafa Hashmi
    Guido Governatori
    Ho-Pun Lam
    Moe Thandar Wynn
    Knowledge and Information Systems, 2018, 57 : 79 - 133
  • [2] Are we done with business process compliance: state of the art and challenges ahead
    Hashmi, Mustafa
    Governatori, Guido
    Lam, Ho-Pun
    Wynn, Moe Thandar
    KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 57 (01) : 79 - 133
  • [3] FABS: A Framework for Addressing the Business Process Change Challenges for Smart City Development
    Javidroozi, Vahid
    Shah, Hanifa
    Feldman, Gerald
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 64850 - 64885
  • [4] A framework for addressing the challenges of business process change during enterprise systems integration
    Javidroozi, Vahid
    Shah, Hanifa
    Feldman, Gerald
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2020, 26 (02) : 463 - 488
  • [5] A Taxonomy of Compliance Processes for Business Process Compliance
    Seyffarth, Tobias
    Kuehnel, Stephan
    Sackmann, Stefan
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT FORUM, 2017, 297 : 71 - 87
  • [6] Auditing business process compliance
    Ghose, Aditya
    Koliadis, George
    SERVICE-ORIENTED COMPUTING - ICSOC 2007, PROCEEDINGS, 2007, 4749 : 169 - +
  • [7] An Algorithm for Business Process Compliance
    Governatori, Guido
    Rotolo, Antonino
    LEGAL KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2008, 189 : 186 - 191
  • [8] A Governance Model Addressing the Challenges of Contemporary Research
    Downes, Linda
    Garad, Rhonda
    Teede, Helena J.
    Norman, Robert J.
    SEMINARS IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (01) : 73 - 79
  • [9] Formalizing and appling compliance patterns for business process compliance
    Elgammal, Amal
    Turetken, Oktay
    van den Heuvel, Willem-Jan
    Papazoglou, Mike
    SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS MODELING, 2016, 15 (01): : 119 - 146
  • [10] Formalizing and appling compliance patterns for business process compliance
    Amal Elgammal
    Oktay Turetken
    Willem-Jan van den Heuvel
    Mike Papazoglou
    Software & Systems Modeling, 2016, 15 : 119 - 146