Concordance Between Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency Review and Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Decision Among New Drug Applications in Japan

被引:0
|
作者
Miyazawa, Makoto [1 ]
Tanaka, Mototsugu [1 ]
Tanaka, Yusuke [1 ]
Terashima, Ryohei [1 ]
Ezura, Mio [1 ]
Miyazawa, Haruna [1 ]
Ikuma, Mutsuhiro [1 ,2 ]
Tomita, Yoshihiko [1 ]
机构
[1] Niigata Univ, Med & Dent Hosp, Clin & Translat Res Ctr, Niigata, Japan
[2] Pharmaceut & Med Devices Agcy, Off Pharmacovigilance, Tokyo, Japan
关键词
APPROVAL; REASONS;
D O I
10.1002/cpt.3485
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
New drug applications (NDAs) in Japan are reviewed by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). Those that pass the review are subsequently subject to deliberation by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Councils (MHLW-PAFSC), and the MHLW legislatively grants approval based on its positive opinions. However, little is known regarding the relationship between the PMDA review and the MHLW decision. We retrospectively assessed the MHLW decision of NDAs that passed the PMDA review at the initial MHLW-PAFSC deliberation from 2002 to 2022. The reasoning behind a non-supportive opinion from the MHLW-PAFSC and the sponsor's actions to overcome unresolved issues were also documented. A total of 2,117 of 2,153 (98.3%) NDAs that passed the PMDA review were approved at the initial MHLW-PAFSC deliberation with a positive opinion. The remaining 36 applications were not approved at the initial deliberation and subjected to continued deliberation because of a non-supportive opinion from the councils, although 29 were finally approved through revision of the application document (24 applications), re-analysis of the data (1 application), or additional clinical trials (4 applications). Seven applications have not been approved, of which one was refused, four were withdrawn, and two were unknown. The MHLW approves NDAs that passed the PMDA review at the initial deliberation at a high rate, suggesting that NDAs only suitable for approval passed the review and reached the MHLW-PAFSC deliberation. Only a few NDAs were not approved at the initial deliberation; however, most of them were finally approved.
引用
收藏
页码:544 / 553
页数:10
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] The Roles of Regulatory Science Research in Drug Development at the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency of Japan
    Asahina, Yasuko
    Tanaka, Ayumi
    Uyama, Yoshiaki
    Kuramochi, Kenji
    Maruyama, Hiroshi
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2013, 47 (01) : 19 - 22
  • [2] The Roles of Regulatory Science Research in Drug Development at the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency of Japan
    Yasuko Asahina
    Ayumi Tanaka
    Yoshiaki Uyama
    Kenji Kuramochi
    Hiroshi Maruyama
    Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science, 2013, 47 : 19 - 22
  • [3] The MIHARI project: establishing a new framework for pharmacoepidemiological drug safety assessments by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency of Japan
    Ishiguro, Chieko
    Takeuchi, Yoshinori
    Uyama, Yoshiaki
    Tawaragi, Tomiko
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2016, 25 (07) : 854 - 859
  • [4] Severe drug eruptions due to lamotrigine in Japan based on data from the relief system of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency
    Saeki, Hidehisa
    Yamada, Kazuo
    Morikawa, Norifumi
    Asahina, Akihiko
    Ochiai, Toyoko
    Iijima, Masafumi
    ALLERGOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 66 (01) : 156 - 158
  • [5] Trends and distribution of external radiation therapy facilities in Japan based on Survey of Medical Institutions from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
    Aoyama, Takahiro
    Koide, Yutaro
    Shimizu, Hidetoshi
    Kitagawa, Tomoki
    Iwata, Tohru
    Hashimoto, Shingo
    Tachibana, Hiroyuki
    Kodaira, Takeshi
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2024, 65 (03) : 328 - 336
  • [6] Comparison of severe drug eruptions in Japan between 2005-2009 and 2010-2014 based on data from the relief system of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency
    Saeki, Hidehisa
    Ochiai, Toyoko
    Iijima, Masafumi
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2017, 44 (03): : E5 - E6
  • [7] Drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome in Japan in the past 10 years based on data from the relief system of the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency
    Kinoshita, Yuri
    Saeki, Hidehisa
    Asahina, Akihiko
    Ochiai, Toyoko
    Iijima, Masafumi
    ALLERGOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 66 (02) : 363 - 365
  • [8] Analysis of regulatory review times of new drugs in Japan: association with characteristics of new drug applications, regulatory agency, and pharmaceutical companies
    Ishibashi, T.
    Kusama, M.
    Sugiyama, Y.
    Ono, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 37 (06) : 657 - 663
  • [9] Patient Access in 14 High-Income Countries to New Antibacterials Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency, Japanese Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, or Health Canada, 2010-2020
    Outterson, Kevin
    Orubu, Ebiowei S. F.
    Rex, John
    Ardal, Christine
    Zaman, Muhammad H.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 74 (07) : 1183 - 1190
  • [10] MD reviewers' role in the new anticancer drug approval process in the newly established Japanese Regulatory Agency, PMDEC (Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Evaluation Center)
    Fujiwara, Y
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1998, 28 (11) : 653 - 656