Trends of seasonal forage yield changes of triticale in the southern Great Plains of the United States

被引:1
|
作者
Kumssa, Tadele T. [1 ,2 ]
Anderson, Joshua D. [1 ]
Johnson, James P. [1 ]
Norton, Shawn [1 ]
Saha, Malay C. [1 ]
Trammell, Michael A. [1 ,3 ]
Rogers, James K. [1 ]
Butler, Twain J. [1 ]
Ma, Xue-Feng [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Noble Res Inst, Ardmore, OK USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL USA
[3] Oklahoma State Univ, Shawnee, OK USA
[4] Forage Genet Int, N5292 Gills Coulee Rd S, West Salem, WI 54669 USA
来源
GRASSLAND RESEARCH | 2022年 / 1卷 / 03期
关键词
cultivar improvement; forage yield; grazing tolerance; regrowth; triticale; DUAL-PURPOSE; WINTER CEREALS; GRAIN; XTRITICOSECALE; IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY; GRASSES;
D O I
10.1002/glr2.12027
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Background: The focus of triticale breeding in the southern Great Plains of the United States has been to increase forage yield for autumn-winter seasons when most other forage species are dormant. This study aims to estimate the trends of seasonal yield changes over time. Methods: Yield trials had been conducted in a randomized complete block design for up to two decades. Seasonal yield changes over time were estimated using linear regression analysis. Results: The analysis revealed a significant positive relation between autumn forage yield (relative to common checks) and calendar years when the trials were conducted. The estimated improvement of autumn forage yield was about 1.9% per year on medium and heavy soil at Ardmore, Oklahoma, and about 5.4% per year on light soil at Burneyville, Oklahoma. However, winter forage yield change was minimal and the spring forage yield increase was negative, although this decline was not significant. Total forage yield improvements were about 0.6% and 0.7% per year at Ardmore and Burneyville, respectively. Similar results were also observed when years of cultivars' introduction were used instead. Conclusions: The results indicate a significant gain in autumn forage yield, but a minor gain in the total forage yield due to the yield tradeoff between the autumn and spring seasons.
引用
收藏
页码:166 / 173
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Triticale Improvement for Forage and Cover Crop Uses in the Southern Great Plains of the United States
    Ayalew, Habtamu
    Kumssa, Tadele T.
    Butler, Twain J.
    Ma, Xue-Feng
    FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2018, 9
  • [2] Yield and quality of wheat, triticale, and elytricum forage in the southern plains
    Rao, SC
    Coleman, SW
    Volesky, JD
    CROP SCIENCE, 2000, 40 (05) : 1308 - 1312
  • [3] Forage yield response to water use for dryland corn, millet, and triticale in the central Great Plains
    Nielsen, David C.
    Vigil, Merle F.
    Benjamin, Joseph G.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2006, 98 (04) : 992 - 998
  • [4] Forage yield and nutritive value of winter wheat varieties in the southern Great Plains
    Ki-Seung Kim
    Joshua D. Anderson
    Euphytica, 2015, 202 : 445 - 457
  • [5] Forage yield and nutritive value of winter wheat varieties in the southern Great Plains
    Kim, Ki-Seung
    Anderson, Joshua D.
    EUPHYTICA, 2015, 202 (03) : 445 - 457
  • [6] Trends in precipitation, streamflow, and evapotranspiration in the Great Plains of the United States
    Garbrecht, J
    Van Liew, M
    Brown, GO
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2004, 9 (05) : 360 - 367
  • [7] Performance of forage soybean in the southern Great Plains
    Rao, SC
    Mayeux, HS
    Northup, BK
    CROP SCIENCE, 2005, 45 (05) : 1973 - 1977
  • [8] Growth, yield, and yield stability of canola in the Northern Great Plains of the United States
    Arinaitwe, Unius
    Clay, Sharon A.
    Nleya, Thandiwe
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2023, 115 (02) : 744 - 758
  • [9] Machine Learning Downscaling of SoilMERGE in the United States Southern Great Plains
    Tobin, Kenneth
    Sanchez, Aaron
    Esparza, Daniela
    Garcia, Miguel
    Ganta, Deepak
    Bennett, Marvin
    REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 15 (21)
  • [10] Identifying winter forage triticale (xTriticosecale Wittmack) strains for the central Great Plains
    Lekgari, Lekgari A.
    Baenziger, P. Stephen
    Vogel, Kenneth P.
    Baltensperger, David D.
    CROP SCIENCE, 2008, 48 (05) : 2040 - 2048