Developing and validating the student learning agency scale in generative artificial intelligence (AI)-supported contexts

被引:0
|
作者
Xia, Liangliang [1 ]
Shen, Kexin [1 ]
Sun, Herui [1 ]
An, Xin [2 ]
Dong, Yan [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ, Sch Educ Technol, 19 Xinjiekouwai St, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Qingdao Univ, Qingda 1st Rd 16, Qingdao, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Student learning agency; Scale development; Generative artificial intelligence; University students; Student agency; SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY; PROFESSIONAL AGENCY; SELF-REGULATION; SATISFACTION; ENVIRONMENTS; EDUCATION; ONLINE;
D O I
10.1007/s10639-024-13137-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
While generative artificial intelligence (AI) empowers students in their learning, it may also have the potential to undermine their learning agency. Understanding student learning agency in the generative AI-supported contexts (SLA-GAI) has become critical for educators. However, student learning agency is a domain-specific construct, current scales neglect the specific generative AI situations. Therefore, current scales are considered inapplicable for measuring SLA-GAI. This study aims to conceptualize the student learning agency and develop and validate the SLA-GAI scale. We conducted an exploratory sequential design with two stages. In the first stage, a literature review and group interview with experts were conducted to conceptualize the student learning agency and generate initial items. 268 valid samples from university students were then collected and exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was employed to adjust the initial items. In the second stage, 425 valid samples were collected and randomly split into two subsamples (n1 = 268, n2 = 245) to conduct EFA and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), respectively. The findings indicate that the SLA-GAI scale includes ten factors with 34 items. Four of these - self-cognition, goal setting, self-adjustment and self-reflection - represent the key ability dimension of the SLA-GAI scale. The other three factors - selective action, responsible action and participative action represent the active action dimension of the SLA-GAI scale. Finally, self-efficacy and volition present the essential mental characteristics of the SLA-GAI scale. The developed SLA-GAI scale can reflect the latest and abundant meaning of the student learning agency in generative AI-supported contexts. It can help educators assess and develop student learning agency in the generative AI-supported contexts and explore related theories.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Artificial intelligence in developing countries: The impact of generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies for development
    Mannuru, Nishith Reddy
    Shahriar, Sakib
    Teel, Zoe A.
    Wang, Ting
    Lund, Brady D.
    Tijani, Solomon
    Pohboon, Chalermchai Oak
    Agbaji, Daniel
    Alhassan, Joy
    Galley, Jaklyn
    Kousari, Raana
    Ogbadu-Oladapo, Lydia
    Saurav, Shubham Kumar
    Srivastava, Aishwarya
    Tummuru, Sai Priya
    Uppala, Sravya
    Vaidya, Praveenkumar
    INFORMATION DEVELOPMENT, 2023,
  • [2] Exploring student perspectives on generative artificial intelligence in higher education learning
    David Baidoo-Anu
    Daniel Asamoah
    Isaac Amoako
    Inuusah Mahama
    Discover Education, 3 (1):
  • [3] Developing and Validating a Scale of Artificial Intelligence Anxiety Among Chinese EFL Teachers
    Liu, Xinyu
    Liu, Yijia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2025, 60 (01)
  • [4] Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Scientific Publications
    Paz-Pacheco, Elizabeth
    JOURNAL OF THE ASEAN FEDERATION OF ENDOCRINE SOCIETIES, 2024, 39 (01): : 4 - 5
  • [5] Developing and validating an AI-supported teaching applications' self-efficacy scale
    Chou, Chun-Mei
    Shen, Tsu-Chi
    Shen, Tsu-Chuan
    Shen, Chien-Hua
    RESEARCH AND PRACTICE IN TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING, 2024, 19
  • [6] AI and Case Management: From Artificial Intelligence to Generative Intelligence
    Powell, Suzanne K.
    PROFESSIONAL CASE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 28 (06) : 259 - 261
  • [7] Not quite eye to AI: student and teacher perspectives on the use of generative artificial intelligence in the writing process
    Barrett, Alex
    Pack, Austin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2023, 20 (01)
  • [8] Student and Faculty Perceptions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Student Writing
    Hostetter, Autumn B.
    Call, Natalie
    Frazier, Grace
    James, Tristan
    Linnertz, Cassandra
    Nestle, Elizabeth
    Tucci, Miaflora
    TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2024,
  • [9] Developing and validating a student feedback literacy scale
    Zhan, Ying
    ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 47 (07) : 1087 - 1100
  • [10] Developing and validating a team cultural intelligence scale
    Bucker, Joost
    Korzilius, Hubert
    APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE, 2024, 73 (03): : 1386 - 1415