Proton stereotactic centralized ablative radiation therapy for treating bulky tumor: a treatment plan study

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Tengxiang [1 ,2 ]
Yao, Xinsen [3 ]
He, Ruimin [1 ,4 ]
Xue, Xian [5 ]
Wang, Shuai [6 ,7 ]
Chen, Jinhu [2 ]
Qiu, Qingtao [2 ]
Yin, Yong [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Quan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South China, Sch Nucl Sci & Technol, Hengyang, Peoples R China
[2] Shandong First Med Univ & Shandong Acad Med Sci, Shandong Canc Hosp & Inst, Dept Radiat Phys, Jinan, Peoples R China
[3] Chenzhou 1 Peoples Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy Ctr, Chenzhou, Peoples R China
[4] Univ South China, Affiliated Hosp 2, Hengyang Med Sch, Dept Oncol, Hengyang, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Inst Radiat Protect & Nucl Safety Med, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Sci & Technol China, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Radiat Oncol, Div Life Sci & Med, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
[7] Univ Sci & Technol China USTC, Sch Nucl Sci & Technol SNST, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2025年 / 15卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
stereotactic; centralized/core ablative; proton; bulky tumor; radiation therapy;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2025.1474327
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective Stereotactic centralized/core ablative radiation therapy (SCART) is a novel radiotherapy approach. This study investigates the potential benefits of proton-based SCART (pSCART) by leveraging the dosimetric advantages of protons and integrating them with the SCART technique. Methods Five clinical cases previously treated with conventional proton therapy were selected for this study. The pSCART plans utilized a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) prescription dose of 24 Gy (RBE) x 3 fractions, with each plan consisting of three to five fields. The prescribed dose for the CyberKnife SCART was the highest value meeting the organs-at-risk (OARs) dose limits and the tumor edge dose limits. The dose distributions of the CyberKnife-based SCART and pSCART plans were compared using five criteria: i) prescription dose; ii) 80% prescription dose volume, targets coverage at 80% and 20% dose levels, and the 80%/20% ratio; iii) volume receiving >5 Gy outside the tumor edge; iv) dose tolerance limits to OARs; and v) mean dose to OARs. Results pSCART can deliver a higher prescription dose of 24 Gy x 3 fractions versus SCART's 15 Gy x 2-3 fractions or 18 Gy x 2 fractions. Specifically, pSCART outperforms SCART in terms of the 80% prescription dose volume and 80% dose level coverage of stereotactic centralized/core target volumes (SCTV) achieving 69.77%-100.00% versus SCART's 43.6%-99.5%. The 20% dose level coverage for gross target volume (GTV) is slightly lower for pSCART, achieving 88.96%-98.64% versus SCART's 90.1%-99.9%. The maximum point dose outside the target volume is lower for pSCART at 4.58-6.19 Gy versus SCART's 4.78-6.67 Gy; additionally, the V-5Gy at the tumor edge is significantly smaller for pSCART at 5.93-23.72 cm(3) versus SCART's 6.85-151.66 cm(3). The average dose to most OARs in the pSCART plan is lower than in the SCART plan. Conclusions This work provides initial insights into evaluating treatment plans for bulky tumors using pSCART. Compared to the CyberKnife SCART, pSCART generates significantly higher prescription doses and larger high-dose regions within the GTV while delivering lower doses at the tumor edge, enhancing normal tissue sparing.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Stereotactic centralized ablative radiation therapy: A novel methodology in treating bulky tumor and its technical realization.
    Yan, Weisi
    Lu, Qiuxia
    Han, Liangfu
    Wang, Brian
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 42 (23_SUPPL) : 159 - 159
  • [2] Proton minibeam radiation therapy for treating metastases: A treatment plan study
    Ortiz, Ramon
    Belshi, Rezart
    De Marzi, Ludovic
    Prezado, Yolanda
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (04) : 2463 - 2473
  • [3] Partial Stereotactic Ablative Boost Radiation Therapy In Bulky NSCLC
    Bai, Y.
    Gao, X.
    Qin, S.
    Chen, J.
    Su, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E673 - E673
  • [4] Stereotactic central/core ablative radiation therapy: results of a phase I study of a novel strategy to treat bulky tumor
    Yang, Jun
    Lu, Qiuxia
    Qi, Weihua
    Kolb, Ryann D.
    Wang, Lei
    Li, Yuan
    Li, Sida
    Lin, Yihui
    Liu, Jiayi
    Mourad, Waleed
    MirkhaghaniHaghighi, Farzaneh
    Slavisa, Tubin
    Wu, Xiaodong
    You, Wei-Ciang
    Yang, Eddy
    Hanlon, Alex
    Zhu, Alan
    Yan, Weisi
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [5] Partial Stereotactic Ablative Boost Radiation Therapy in Bulky Bladder/Urothelial Cancer
    Bai, Y.
    Gao, X.
    Qin, S.
    Chen, J.
    Su, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2018, 102 (03): : E94 - E94
  • [6] Remotely Pre-Planned Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: Validation of Treatment Plan Quality
    Juang, T.
    Bush, K.
    Loo, B.
    Gensheimer, M.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3605 - 3605
  • [7] Anatomic optimization of lung tumor stereotactic ablative radiation therapy
    Yu, Amy S.
    von Eyben, Rie
    Yamamoto, Tokihiro
    Diehn, Maximilian
    Shultz, David B.
    Loo, Billy W.
    Maxim, Peter G.
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 5 (06) : E607 - E613
  • [8] Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: Role in Treatment of Liver Metastases
    Meyer, Jeffrey J.
    Timmerman, Robert D.
    Crane, Christopher H.
    CURRENT COLORECTAL CANCER REPORTS, 2012, 8 (02) : 123 - 129
  • [9] Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer
    Tran, P. T.
    Radwan, N.
    Ross, A. E.
    Reyes, D.
    Wright, J. L.
    Song, D.
    Deville, C., Jr.
    DeWeese, T. L.
    Carducci, M.
    Schaeffer, E. M.
    Pienta, K.
    Eisenberger, M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 96 (02): : E248 - E248
  • [10] Lung Tumor Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy With Individualized Anatomic Optimization
    Yu, S.
    Loo, B. W.
    Maxim, P. G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 87 (02): : S737 - S738