Assessing Meaningful Interaction in Focus Group Discussions Conducted Over WhatsApp

被引:0
|
作者
Dedios-Sanguineti, Maria Cecilia [1 ]
Guarin, Angela [1 ]
Torres-Garcia, Ariana [1 ]
Gomez, Mariana Martinez [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Los Andes, Sch Govt, Cra 1 19-27,Bloque Aulas,Piso 2,Of 318, Bogota 111711, Colombia
关键词
interaction; focus group discussions; qualitative methods; online research; WhatsApp; data richness; sense-making; FACE-TO-FACE; ONLINE;
D O I
10.1177/16094069251321599
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Focus group discussions (FGDs) differ from other qualitative data collection techniques because they offer unique insights into how collective sense-making occurs in real time in social settings. However, systematic qualitative tools to analyze interaction in FGDs and the richness of data it yields remain scarce. In this article, we propose a seven qualitative indicator model, adapted from previous studies on FGD data quality, to assess group interaction. We apply the model to FGDs (n = 12) conducted via the instant messaging application WhatsApp as part of a study on access to social protection programs in Colombia conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our findings show that the proposed indicators can assess meaningful interaction as it unfolds in asynchronous online FGDs. Unlike existing tools that examine interaction in online FGDs quantitatively and through a dichotomous understanding (either absent or present), our proposed model seizes the idea of varying types of meaningful interaction: stance-only, basic interaction, and complex interaction. Our results suggest that complex participant interactions can emerge in online FGDs conducted via WhatsApp, therefore situating messaging apps as promising data collection sites for including hard-to-reach and highly mobile populations in research. The proposed qualitative indicators model is a useful tool for assessing interaction in FGDs and provides insights into whether and how collective sense-making occurred.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] Sustainable technology and user participation: Assessing ecological housing concepts by focus group discussions
    Ornetzeder, M
    CULTURE, ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION, AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2003, : 145 - 158
  • [3] Focus group discussions in medical research
    M. Lakshman
    Maryann Charles
    Moumita Biswas
    Leena Sinha
    N. K. Arora
    The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 2000, 67 (5) : 358 - 362
  • [4] The influence of ethnic group composition on focus group discussions
    Nan Greenwood
    Theresa Ellmers
    Jess Holley
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 14
  • [5] The influence of ethnic group composition on focus group discussions
    Greenwood, Nan
    Ellmers, Theresa
    Holley, Jess
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2014, 14
  • [6] Assessing Meaningful Improvement: Focus on the Tinnitus Functional Index
    Henry, J. A.
    Thielman, E. J.
    Zaugg, T.
    Griest, S.
    Stewart, B. J.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2024, 45 (03): : 537 - 549
  • [7] Assessing Needs for Nutrition Education to Prevent Childhood Overweight: Focus Group Discussions with Head Start Parents
    Adedze, Pascasie
    Witz, Klaus G.
    Orr, Robin A.
    Donovan, Sharon M.
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2008, 22
  • [8] Online conferencing for focus group discussions with teenage girls
    Thompson, Roberta
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2019, 19 (03) : 281 - 293
  • [9] Disability and higher education: assessing students' capabilities in two Italian universities using structured focus group discussions
    Biggeri, Mario
    Di Masi, Diego
    Bellacicco, Rosa
    STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2020, 45 (04) : 909 - 924
  • [10] Using WhatsApp Focus Group Discussions to Collect Qualitative Data Collection During a Pandemic: Exploring Knowledge, Attitudes, and Perceptions of COVID-19 in Singapore
    Neo, Pearlyn H. M.
    Lim, Jane M.
    Tan, Rayner K. J.
    Ong, Suan Ee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE METHODS, 2022, 21