RISK-INFORMED DEFENSE-IN-DEPTH STRATRGY FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

被引:0
|
作者
Liu, Qianwen [1 ]
Wu, Yuxiang [1 ]
Wang, Yuhan [1 ]
机构
[1] China Nucl Power Engn Co Ltd, Beijing 100840, Peoples R China
关键词
Defense-in-Depth; Limitations; Risk-informed; Integrated decision-making;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
As one of the basic safety design theory, Defense-In-Depth (DID) concept has been proven effective for ensuring the safety of nuclear reactors by safety operation of hundreds of units for decades. The classic defense- in-depth concept containing five defense layers is built on mainstream light-water reactor type. And after Fukushima nuclear accident, improvements of the DID concept was proposed by IAEA and WENRA, including adding sublevel for additional Design Extension Condition (DEC), and emphasizing the independence between defense levels. However, there are several problems during DID practical application; and current DID concept based on deterministic method has limitations for innovative design or advanced technology application, such as non-light water reactor designs, because current DID strategy evolves from LWR type and earlier deterministic hypothesis. How to develop a more comprehensive, holistic, and technology-inclusive DID strategy is explored in this study. A risk-informed (RI) method is adopted to improve the DID strategy by combining the traditional DID concept with a risk-informed approach. Considering the gradual development of risk assessment methods and tools and acceptance process of risk insight for nuclear industry, a progressive risk-informed DID strategy is proposed in this article, including three RI solutions with different optimized elements, which are implemented through an integrated risk- informed DID design process balancing between deterministic and risk perspectives, and allocating resources to weakness that might be overlooked.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RISK-INFORMED AND DEFENSE-IN-DEPTH ORIENTED PLANT DESIGN APPROACH
    Morota, Hidetsugu
    Suzuki, Hiroshi
    Sakihama, Takashi
    Nasif, Hesham R.
    Sano, Hiroshi
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND THE ASME 2012 POWER CONFERENCE - 2012, VOL 2, 2012, : 407 - 422
  • [2] DEFENSE-IN-DEPTH APPROACH FOR USE IN A RISK-INFORMED, TECHNOLOGY-NEUTRAL DESIGN AND LICENSING FRAMEWORK FOR NEW NUCLEAR PLANTS
    Chapman, Jim
    Hess, Stephen M.
    ICONE17, VOL 4, 2009, : 55 - 63
  • [3] Defense-in-depth and diversity design of instrumentation and control system in nuclear power plant
    Zhou, Jixiang
    Zhu, Pan
    Xiao, Peng
    Hedongli Gongcheng/Nuclear Power Engineering, 2014, 35 (01): : 122 - 124
  • [4] A risk informed defense-in-depth framework for existing and advanced reactors
    Fleming, KN
    Silady, FA
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2002, 78 (03) : 205 - 225
  • [5] APPLICATION OF RISK-INFORMED METHODS TO IMPROVE PLANT OPERATION AT KOZLODUY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
    Kichev, Emil
    Ivanov, Ivan
    Mancheva, Kaliopa
    Petrov, Yasen
    Vladimirova, Vesselina
    ICONE 17: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, VOL 1, 2009, : 119 - 132
  • [6] Research on Defense-in-Depth Zone of Low-Altitude Security Area in Nuclear Power Plant
    Ye, Lin
    Zhang, Jie
    Meng, Guang
    NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS: INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES FOR INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL SYSTEMS (ISNPP 2019), 2020, 595 : 30 - 37
  • [8] Risk-informed business modeling for nuclear power generation
    Liming, JK
    Grantom, CR
    PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 1865 - 1870
  • [9] RESEARCH ON THE INSPECTION STRATEGY CHANGE BASED ON RISK-INFORMED METHOD IN NUCLEAR POWER PLANT
    Ye Shuixiang
    Li Qiongzhe
    Xi Haiying
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NUCLEAR ENGINEERING, 2017, VOL 4, 2017,
  • [10] Preliminary Study on Risk-informed LBLOCA of CPR1000 Nuclear Power Plant
    Song J.
    Yang J.
    Liu J.
    Liu P.
    Wang T.
    Liu Y.
    Yuanzineng Kexue Jishu/Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2018, 52 (06): : 1028 - 1033