Water Environment Assessment of Xin'an River Basin in China Based on DPSIR and Entropy Weight-TOPSIS Models

被引:0
|
作者
Guo, Yanlong [1 ,2 ]
Song, Yijia [2 ]
Huang, Jie [3 ]
Zhang, Lu [4 ]
机构
[1] Xinjiang Hetian Coll, Natl Cultural Creat Ind Res Ctr, Hetian 848000, Peoples R China
[2] Anhui Univ, Social Innovat Design Res Ctr, Hefei 203106, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Durham, Psychol Dept, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[4] Hefei Informat Technol Univ, Sch New Media Arts, Hefei 203106, Peoples R China
关键词
aquatic environment; Xin'an River Basin; ecological safety; MANAGEMENT; SECURITY;
D O I
10.3390/w17060781
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Water environment evaluation is the basis of water resource planning and sustainable utilization. As a successful case of the coordinated progress of ecological protection and economic development, the Xin'an River Basin is a model for exploring the green development model. However, there are still some problems in the synergistic cooperation between the two provinces. Exploring the differences within the basin is a key entry point for solving the dilemma of synergistic governance in the Xin'an River Basin, optimizing the allocation of resources, and improving the overall effectiveness of governance. Based on the DPSIR model, 21 water environment-related indicators were selected, and the entropy weight-TOPSIS method and gray correlation model were used to evaluate the temporal and spatial status of water resources in each county of the Xin'an River Basin. The results show that (1) The relative proximity of the water environment in Xin'an River Basin fluctuated in "M" shape during the ten years of the study period, and the relative proximity reached the optimal solution of 0.576 in 2020. (2) From the five subsystems, the state layer and the corresponding layer are the most important factors influencing the overall water environment of the Xin'an River Basin. In the future, it is intended to improve the departmental collaboration mechanism. (3) The mean values of relative proximity in Qimen County, Jiande City, and Chun'an County during the study period were 0.448, 0.445, and 0.439, respectively, and the three areas reached a moderate level. The water environment in Huizhou District and Jixi County, on the other hand, is relatively poor, and the mean values of proximity are 0.337 and 0.371, respectively, at the alert level. The poor effect of synergistic development requires a multi-factor exploration of reasonable ecological compensation standards. We give relevant suggestions for this situation.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ecological Assessment of Water Environment in Huizhou Region of China Based on DPSIR Theory and Entropy Weight TOPSIS Model
    Deng, Weihua
    Li, Xuan
    Guo, Yanlong
    Huang, Jie
    Zhang, Linfu
    WATER, 2024, 16 (18)
  • [2] Evaluating water resources carrying capacity of Pearl River Delta by entropy weight-TOPSIS model
    Zhou, Yueying
    Liu, Zufa
    Zhang, Bowei
    Yang, Qiannan
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [3] Comprehensive evaluation of urban talent development environment based on entropy weight-topsis method
    Gao, Bin
    Zhang, Naiwen
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2023, 44 (05) : 7577 - 7587
  • [4] Evaluation of New Power System Based on Entropy Weight-TOPSIS Method
    Liu, Yang
    Wang, Yunling
    Li, Ting
    Ma, Ruiguang
    Xu, Ke
    Xu, Weiting
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022
  • [5] Energy poverty assessment in the Belt and Road Initiative countries: based on entropy weight-TOPSIS approach
    Kui Zhou
    Yinsu Wang
    Jamal Hussain
    Energy Efficiency, 2022, 15
  • [6] Assessment of Sustainable Supply Capability of Chinese Tin Resources Based on the Entropy Weight-TOPSIS Model
    Fan, Xiaolei
    Li, Hao
    Yu, Qinfei
    Xu, Jianming
    Li, Meng
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (17)
  • [7] Energy poverty assessment in the Belt and Road Initiative countries: based on entropy weight-TOPSIS approach
    Zhou, Kui
    Wang, Yinsu
    Hussain, Jamal
    ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2022, 15 (07)
  • [8] Performance Analysis of Marine Ecological Environment Governance Based on DPSIR and Entropy Weight TOPSIS Model
    Shengde, Hu
    Zhonghua, Li
    MOBILE INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2022, 2022
  • [9] UBI Rate Determination Method Based on Entropy Weight-Topsis and Clustering
    Zhao, Mingqing
    Li, Qinglian
    2019 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND BUSINESS ANALYTICS (ICDSBA 2019), 2019, : 197 - 201
  • [10] Evaluation of New Power System Based on Entropy Weight-TOPSIS Method
    Liu, Yang
    Wang, Yunling
    Li, Ting
    Ma, Ruiguang
    Xu, Ke
    Xu, Weiting
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2022, 2022