Clinical outcomes of nonthermal ablation, thermal ablation, and surgical stripping for varicose veins

被引:1
|
作者
Kim, Hyangkyoung [1 ]
Cho, Sungsin [2 ]
Lee, Kwangjin [3 ]
Labropoulos, Nicos [4 ]
Joh, Jin Hyun [2 ]
机构
[1] Ewha Womans Univ Mokdong Hosp, Dept Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ Hosp Gangdong, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Kangwon Natl Univ, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Chunchon, South Korea
[4] SUNY Stony Brook, Med Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY USA
关键词
Mechanochemical ablation; Nonthermal ablation; Radiofrequency ablation; Quality of life; Surgical stripping; Varicose vein; ENDOVENOUS LASER-ABLATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GREAT SAPHENOUS-VEIN; CYANOACRYLATE CLOSURE; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; REFLUX; COMPLICATIONS; PATIENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101902
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cyanoacrylate closure (CAC), mechanochemical ablation (MOCA), and surgical stripping (SS) for incompetent saphenous veins and to determine a suitable treatment modality for a specific fi c clinical situation. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with varicose veins who underwent RFA, CAC, MOCA, or SS from January 2012 to June 2023. The clinical outcomes, including postoperative complications and the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score, were assessed. Results: During the study period, 2866 patients with varicose veins were treated. Among them, 1670 patients (57.9%) were women. The mean age was 55.3 6 12.9 years. RFA, CAC, MOCA, and SS were performed in 1984 (68.7%), 732 (25.4%), 78 (2.7%), and 88 (3.0%) patients, respectively. The complete target vein closure rate after RFA, CAC, and MOCA was 94.5%, 98%, and 98%, respectively. The absence of a target vein after SS was 98%. Deep vein thrombosis developed in four patients: one in the RFA group and three in CAC group. Surgical or endovenous procedure-induced thrombosis occurred in 2.3%, 4.8%, 6.4%, and 2.3% of the patients after RFA, CAC, MOCA, and SS, respectively. Phlebitis along the target vein occurred in 0.2% and 3.8% of patients after RFA and MOCA, respectively. A hypersensitivity reaction occurred in 3.7% of patients after CAC. Readmission was required for two patients who had undergone SS. Transient nerve symptoms developed in fi ve (0.3%), zero, one (1.3%), and two (2.3%) patients after RFA, CAC, MOCA, and SS, respectively. After treatment, the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score improved significantly fi cantly in all groups. Conclusions: The clinical outcomes with improvement in quality of life were comparable among the different treatment modalities. The proximity of the nerve or skin to the target vein is the most important factor in selecting a suitable treatment modality. (J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2024;12:101902.)
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation for Unilateral and Bilateral Varicose Veins
    Jeon, Sook Young
    Joh, Jin Hyun
    Park, Ho-Chul
    DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY, 2018, 44 (01) : 101 - 105
  • [2] Randomized clinical trial comparing endovenous laser ablation, radiofrequency ablation, foam sclerotherapy and surgical stripping for great saphenous varicose veins
    Rasmussen, L. H.
    Lawaetz, M.
    Bjoern, L.
    Vennits, B.
    Blemings, A.
    Eklof, B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (08) : 1079 - 1087
  • [3] Steam ablation versus stripping of great saphenous varicose veins
    Naes, Anne-Katrine Lislegaard
    Halsteinli, Vidar
    Seternes, Arne
    TIDSSKRIFT FOR DEN NORSKE LAEGEFORENING, 2019, 139 (05) : 428 - 433
  • [4] Clinical results and cost-effectiveness of radiofrequency and cyanoacrylate ablation compared with traditional surgical stripping for treating varicose veins
    Vicente-Jimenez, Sandra
    Lopez-Valcarcel, Beatriz
    Maynar, Manual
    Perez-Fernandez, Elia
    Carrasco, Pilar
    Rodriguez-Caravaca, Gil
    Navarro, Jose M.
    Del Riego, Silvia
    De Benito, Luis
    Fontcuberta, Juan
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY-VENOUS AND LYMPHATIC DISORDERS, 2022, 10 (04) : 846 - +
  • [5] What next after thermal ablation for varicose veins: Non-thermal ablation?
    McHugh, S. M.
    Leahy, A. L.
    SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2014, 12 (05): : 237 - 238
  • [6] Conventional stripping versus laser ablation in the treatment of primary varicose veins
    Van den Bussche, D
    Audenaert, EA
    van den Heuvel, M
    Vuylsteke, M
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH WORLD CONGRESS INTERNATIONAL UNION OF PHLEBOLOGY, 2005, : 193 - 196
  • [7] Endovenous thermal ablation for varicose veins: strengths and weaknesses
    van den Bos, Renate R.
    de Maeseneer, Marianne M. G.
    PHLEBOLYMPHOLOGY, 2012, 19 (04) : 163 - 169
  • [8] The clinical outcomes of endovenous microwave and laser ablation for varicose veins: A prospective study
    Yang, Lin
    Wang, Xiaoping
    Wei, Zhiqing
    Zhu, Chenghua
    Liu, Jianlin
    Han, Yang
    SURGERY, 2020, 168 (05) : 909 - 914
  • [9] Factors Associated with Recurrence of Varicose Veins after Thermal Ablation: Results of The Recurrent Veins after Thermal Ablation Study
    Bush, R. G.
    Bush, P.
    Flanagan, J.
    Fritz, R.
    Gueldner, T.
    Koziarski, J.
    McMullen, K.
    Zumbro, G.
    SCIENTIFIC WORLD JOURNAL, 2014,
  • [10] Radiofrequency ablation and laser ablation in the treatment of varicose veins
    Almeida, Jose I.
    Raines, Jeffrey K.
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2006, 20 (04) : 547 - 552