Meta-Analytic Reliability Generalization Study of Perceived Stress Scale in Türkiye Sample

被引:0
|
作者
Dogan, Omer [1 ]
Gelbal, Selahattin [2 ]
机构
[1] Minist Natl Educ, Usak, Turkiye
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Educ, Ankara, Turkiye
关键词
reliability generalization; meta-analysis; perceived stress scale; Cronbach alpha coefficient; Bonett method; COEFFICIENT ALPHA; MEASUREMENT ERROR; PUBLICATION BIAS; HETEROGENEITY; AGREEMENT; VALIDITY; SCORES;
D O I
10.21031/epod.1536530
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
The aim of the study is to examine the meta-analytic reliability generalization of the 14, 10, and 8-item forms of the Perceived Stress Scale, which was developed by Cohen, Kamarck and Mermelstein in 1983 and translated into Turkish by different researchers (Erci, 2006; Yerlikaya & & Idot;nan & ccedil;, 2007; Eskin et al. 2013, etc.) between 2006 and 2013, for the theses produced in T & uuml;rkiye. For this purpose, how different moderator variables affect the reliability coefficients and publication bias were also examined. A total of 81 Cronbach Alpha coefficients from 78 studies, selected in accordance with the established criteria, were included in the meta-analysis. Reliability generalization was applied in the data analysis. The analyses were conducted using the random effects model with coefficient values converted through the Bonett method. In the study, the effect size value was found to be .82 (95% CI: .80, .83), and it was concluded that the sample type (alpha= .81) and the study area (alpha= .81) moderator variables had a statistically significant effect on the reliability estimation in terms of heterogeneity of effect sizes. This revealed that these two moderator variables affected the estimations of the reliability coefficients. In addition, it has been observed that other moderator variables such as age, gender, and the number of items in the scale are not sources of heterogeneity and have no effect on reliability estimation. From this, it was deduced that the scale works well enough to generalize to different contexts with different item numbers. Finally, according to the results of the analysis for the determination of publication bias, it was seen that there was no publication bias in the study.
引用
收藏
页码:221 / 246
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Meta-Analytic Reliability Generalization Study of the Oxford Happiness Scale in Turkish Sample
    Ozdemir, Vildan
    Yildirim, Yildiz
    Tan, Seref
    JOURNAL OF MEASUREMENT AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION AND PSYCHOLOGY-EPOD, 2020, 11 (04): : 374 - 404
  • [2] The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study
    Lopez-Pina, Jose A.
    Sanchez-Meca, Julio
    Rosa-Alcazar, Ana I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 9 (01) : 143 - 159
  • [3] THE META-ANALYTIC APPROACH OF RELIABILITY GENERALIZATION
    Sanchez-Meca, J.
    Lopez-Pina, J. A.
    ACCION PSICOLOGICA, 2008, 5 (02): : 37 - 64
  • [4] Characteristics that affect score reliability in the Berg Balance Scale: a meta-analytic reliability generalization study
    Meseguer-Henarejos, Ana-Belen
    Rubio-Aparicio, Maria
    Lopez-Pina, Jose-Antonio
    Carles-Hernandez, Ricardo
    Gomez-Conesa, Antonia
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL AND REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2019, 55 (05) : 570 - 584
  • [5] A meta-analytic reliability generalization study of the Maslach Burnout Inventory
    Aguayo, Raimundo
    Vargas, Cristina
    de la Fuente, Emilia I.
    Lozano, Luis M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 11 (02) : 343 - 361
  • [6] The general attitudes towards artificial intelligence (GAAIS): A meta-analytic reliability generalization study
    Sahin, Melek Gulsah
    Yildirim, Yildiz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ASSESSMENT TOOLS IN EDUCATION, 2024, 11 (02): : 303 - 319
  • [7] EXPLORING SOURCES OF VARIABILITY OF THE WHOQOL-BREF RELIABILITY COEFFICIENT: A META-ANALYTIC RELIABILITY GENERALIZATION STUDY
    Chang, Kai-chun
    Wu, Chia-huei
    Yao, Grace
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2005, 14 (09) : 2136 - 2136
  • [8] Reliability Generalization of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire: A Meta-Analytic View of Reliability Estimates
    Holland, David F.
    Kraha, Amanda
    Zientek, Linda R.
    Nimon, Kim
    Fulmore, Julia A.
    Johnson, Ursula Y.
    Ponce, Hector F.
    Aguilar, Mariya Gavrilova
    Henson, Robin K.
    SAGE OPEN, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [9] Myers-Briggs type indicator score reliability across studies: A meta-analytic reliability generalization study
    Capraro, RM
    Capraro, MM
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2002, 62 (04) : 590 - 602
  • [10] The reliability of meta-analytic review
    Zakzanis, KK
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1998, 83 (01) : 215 - 222