Diagnosis of prosthetic vascular graft infection using the management aortic graft infection collaboration (MAGIC) criteria

被引:0
|
作者
Adlouni, Mu'ath [1 ]
Sheikh, Daanish [2 ]
Dang, Vy [1 ]
Koh, Ezra Y. [3 ]
Fong, Brandon [1 ]
Nathani, Raniyah [4 ]
Rahimi, Maham [3 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M, Sch Med, Bryan, TX USA
[2] UT Hlth San Antonio, Long Sch Med, San Antonio, TX USA
[3] Houston Methodist Hosp, Dept Cardiovasc Surg, 6565 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Coll Engn, Bryan, TX USA
关键词
Vascular graft infection; peripheral grafts; MAGIC; PET;
D O I
10.1177/17085381251326995
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background Vascular graft infection (VGI) is a devastating complication that necessitates immediate diagnosis to reduce morbidity and mortality. In 2016, The Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) proposed a diagnostic algorithm for identifying aortic graft infection which uses clinical, radiological, and laboratory findings to determine risk. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively validate the MAGIC criteria for VGI diagnosis and potentially broaden its application.Methods An IRB approved retrospective cohort study was performed with 28 suspected VGI patients from our institution. A blinded chart review categorized patients based on MAGIC criteria into "infected," "suspected infection," or "insufficient evidence" groups. Due to the MAGIC criteria's placement of a third outcome, "suspected infection," the results were dichotomized into two systems whereby "suspected infection" patients were considered as infected (S = I) or uninfected (S = NI). Both dichotomized systems from the MAGIC criteria were then compared to the clinical diagnosis (with surgical evidence when possible) from which sensitivity and specificity were calculated.Results A total of 15 patients (54%) presented with definitive VGI, two patients (7%) presented with suspicion for VGI, and 11 patients (39%) presented with insufficient evidence to suspect VGI; placement in these categories were determined by the MAGIC criteria at entry to the study. When using clinical diagnoses, 17 out of 28 had VGI (61%). When using the categorization system S = I, sensitivity was 88.2% and specificity of 100%, for S = NI, sensitivity dropped to 76.4%, but specificity remained at 100%. These results were recomputed using only 25 of the 28 patients who were good surgical candidates. Using this new surgical threshold and smaller cohort to compare MAGIC against, sensitivity was calculated to be 93.3% with a specificity of 100% when S = I. When S = NI, the sensitivity was calculated to be 86.7% with specificity remaining at 100%.Conclusions The MAGIC criteria provide excellent specificity and reasonable sensitivity for diagnosis of VGI for peripheral and aortic revascularization.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC) Criteria for the Diagnosis of Vascular Graft/Endograft Infection: Results from the Prospective Vascular Graft Cohort Study
    Anagnostopoulos, Alexia
    Mayer, Fabienne
    Ledergerber, Bruno
    Bergada-Pijuan, Judith
    Husmann, Lars
    Mestres, Carlos A.
    Rancic, Zoran
    Hasse, Barbara
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 62 (02) : 251 - 257
  • [2] Diagnosis of Aortic Graft Infection: A Case Definition by the Management of Aortic Graft Infection Collaboration (MAGIC)
    Lyons, O. T. A.
    Baguneid, M.
    Barwick, T. D.
    Bell, R. E.
    Foster, N.
    Homer-Vanniasinkam, S.
    Hopkins, S.
    Hussain, A.
    Katsanos, K.
    Modarai, B.
    Sandoe, J. A. T.
    Thomas, S.
    Price, N. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 52 (06) : 758 - 763
  • [3] AORTIC GRAFT INFECTIONS - AORTIC PROSTHETIC GRAFT INFECTION
    SEDWITZ, MM
    FREISCHLAG, JA
    PROBLEMS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 1989, 6 (01): : 118 - 124
  • [4] The need for a validated pathway for the diagnosis and management of prosthetic vascular graft infection
    Rawson, Timothy Miles
    Lee, Ming J.
    Renton, Sophie
    Buckley, Jim
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 60 (02) : 551 - 551
  • [5] PROSTHETIC VASCULAR GRAFT INFECTION
    OBRIEN, T
    COLLIN, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1992, 79 (12) : 1262 - 1267
  • [6] Detection of aortic prosthetic graft infection with 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging, concordance with consensus MAGIC graft infection criteria
    Wei Dong
    Yu Li
    Junming Zhu
    Jinghong Xia
    Linlin He
    Mingkai Yun
    Jian Jiao
    Guangfa Zhu
    Marcus Hacker
    Yongxiang Wei
    Xiaoli Zhang
    Xiang Li
    Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, 2021, 28 : 1005 - 1016
  • [7] Detection of aortic prosthetic graft infection with 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging, concordance with consensus MAGIC graft infection criteria
    Dong, Wei
    Li, Yu
    Zhu, Junming
    Xia, Jinghong
    He, Linlin
    Yun, Mingkai
    Jiao, Jian
    Zhu, Guangfa
    Hacker, Marcus
    Wei, Yongxiang
    Zhang, Xiaoli
    Li, Xiang
    JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 1005 - 1016
  • [8] Expanding the imaging armamentarium for the diagnosis of prosthetic aortic graft infection
    Luc, Jessica G. Y.
    Preventza, Ourania
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2022, 63 (01)
  • [9] Prevention of prosthetic vascular graft infection
    Fletcher, JP
    Vicaretti, M
    ADVANCES IN VASCULAR PATHOLOGY 1997, 1997, 1150 : 89 - 100
  • [10] Prosthetic vascular graft infection imagine
    Khaja, Minhaj S.
    Sildiroglu, Onur
    Hagspiel, Klaus
    Rehm, Patrice K.
    Cherry, Kenneth J.
    Turba, Ulku C.
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2013, 37 (02) : 239 - 244