Pedestrian automatic emergency braking responses to a stationary or crossing adult mannequin during the day and night

被引:0
|
作者
Kidd, David G. [1 ]
Riexinger, Luke E. [1 ]
Perez-Rapela, Daniel [2 ]
Jermakian, Jessica S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Insurance Inst Highway Safety, 988 Dairy Rd, Ruckersville, VA 22968 USA
[2] Human Injury Consulting & Res LLC, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
Pedestrian crash; automatic emergency braking; front crash prevention; pedestrian detection; SYSTEMS; CRASHES; LIGHT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: Automatic emergency braking systems with pedestrian detection (PAEB) are effective at preventing pedestrian crashes, but the safety benefits are not observed at night. This study used the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) PAEB test data to characterize PAEB responses in different lighting conditions and for different rated systems. Methods: Data from 6,919 IIHS PAEB tests were retrieved from IIHS databases. Invalid trials, trials without AEB, and trials with outliers were removed leaving 5,894 trials from 212 model year 2018 to 2023 vehicles for analysis. PAEB responses were characterized by computing the time-to-collision (TTC) of forward collision warning (FCW) and AEB; brake threat number (BTN); mean deceleration; maximum deceleration; and maximum jerk. A linear mixed-effects model was used to predict each dependent measure with scenario (crossing adult, stationary adult), speed, rating (superior, basic/advanced), lighting (day, night with high beams, night with low beams), and their interactions. Vehicle was included as a random effect. A Bonferroni correction was applied to maintain a family-wise type-1 error rate of 0.05 across 138 total hypothesis tests. Results: PAEB system warnings were later and automatic braking occurred later as speed increased at night with low beams but changed little at night with high beams and during the day (p < 0.0004). BTN increased more rapidly as speed increased at night with low beams compared with high beams and during the day (p < 0.0004). Based on the BTN model, on average, PAEB systems can brake to avoid the adult mannequin (BTN < 1) when closing speed is less than 67 km/h during the day and at night with high beams but only when closing speed is less than 49 km/h at night with low beams. Superior-rated PAEB systems warned and braked earlier compared with basic/advanced-rated systems (p < 0.0004). Conclusions: Increased lighting from high beams made nighttime performance resemble daytime performance in controlled testing. Increasing output from vehicle low beams, increasing the use of high beams, and enhancing overhead lighting around crosswalks and pedestrian areas are all methods for increasing lighting, improving pedestrian conspicuity, and enhancing PAEB performance to prevent pedestrian crashes.
引用
收藏
页码:S116 / S125
页数:10
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Pedestrian automatic emergency braking responses to a stationary or crossing adult mannequin during the day and night
    Kidd, David G.
    Riexinger, Luke E.
    Perez-Rapela, Daniel
    Jermakian, Jessica S.
    TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2024, 25 : S116 - S125
  • [2] Infrared Reflectivity of Pedestrian Mannequin for Autonomous Emergency Braking Testing
    Haran, Terence
    Chien, Stanley
    2016 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2016, : 2230 - 2235
  • [3] Analysis of the Braking Behaviour in Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking
    Lopez, Alberto
    Sherony, Rini
    Chien, Stanley
    Li, Lingxi
    Yi, Qiang
    Chen, Yaobin
    2015 IEEE 18TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2015, : 1117 - 1122
  • [4] Effects of automatic emergency braking systems on pedestrian crash risk
    Cicchino, Jessica B.
    ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2022, 172
  • [5] Optimization of Braking Strategy for Automatic Emergency Braking System in Vehicle-Pedestrian Accidents
    Qian, Yubin
    Yang, Xueyan
    Xiao, Lingyun
    Zhu, Yican
    SAE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PASSENGER CARS-ELECTRONIC AND ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS, 2019, 12 (02):
  • [6] Research on Autonomous Emergency Braking System Strategy Based on Pedestrian Crossing the Road
    Tian, Zhewen
    Wang, Yuming
    SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTROMECHANICAL CONTROL TECHNOLOGY AND TRANSPORTATION (ICECTT 2021), 2022, 12081
  • [7] Pedestrian Protection Using the Integration of V2V and the Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking System
    Tang, Bo
    Chien, Stanley
    Huang, Zhi
    Chen, Yaobin
    2016 IEEE 19TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (ITSC), 2016, : 2213 - 2218
  • [8] Certainty and Critical Speed for Decision Making in Tests of Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking Systems
    Rosado, Alberto Lopez
    Chien, Stanley
    Li, Lingxi
    Yi, Qiang
    Chen, Yaobin
    Sherony, Rini
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2017, 18 (06) : 1358 - 1370
  • [9] A case study of nighttime pedestrian automatic emergency braking performance under different roadway lighting and pedestrian clothing conditions
    Kidd, David G.
    Spivey, Watson
    TRAFFIC INJURY PREVENTION, 2024, 25 : S250 - S253
  • [10] SMIRK: A machine learning-based pedestrian automatic emergency braking system with a complete safety case
    Socha, Kasper
    Borg, Markus
    Henriksson, Jens
    SOFTWARE IMPACTS, 2022, 13