Phase I Trial of Upamostat Combined With Gemcitabine in Locally Unresectable or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Safety and Preliminary Efficacy Assessment

被引:0
|
作者
Lai, Xiuping [1 ]
Cheng, Di [2 ]
Xu, Huixin [2 ]
Wang, Jingshu [2 ]
Lv, Xiaozhi [1 ]
Yao, Herui [1 ,2 ]
Li, Liuning [3 ]
Wu, Junyan [1 ]
Ye, Suiwen [1 ]
Li, Zhihua [2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sun Yat Sen Mem Hosp, Phase Clin Trial Ctr 1, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sun Yat Sen Mem Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Guangzhou Tradit Chinese Med, Guangdong Prov Hosp Chinese Med, Dept Med Oncol, Clin Med Coll 2, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
CANCER MEDICINE | 2025年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
LH011; maximum tolerated dose; pancreatic cancer; upamostat; urokinase inhibitor; PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR; COMBINATION; EXPERIENCE; SURVIVAL; MESUPRON; RECEPTOR;
D O I
10.1002/cam4.70550
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
AimThis study aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) inhibitor upamostat (LH011) in combination with gemcitabine for locally advanced unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer.MethodSeventeen patients were enrolled and received escalating doses of oral LH011 (100, 200, 400, or 600 mg) daily alongside 1000 mg/m2 of gemcitabine. Safety profiles, tumor response (including response rate and progression-free survival), pharmacokinetics, and changes in CA199 and D-dimer levels were assessed.ResultsDuring the study period (Day0-Day49), no patients achieved partial response. Stable disease (SD) was observed in 12 patients (70.6%), while four patients (23.5%) experienced progressive disease (PD). One patient withdrew due to a serious adverse event (SAE) on D47. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed a dose-related increase in LH011 and its metabolite WX-UK1 exposure from 100 to 400 mg but not in the 600 mg group. Hematological toxicity, mainly attributable to gemcitabine, was the predominant grade 3 or 4 adverse event, with additional occurrences of loss of appetite, rash, and interstitial lung disease. Sinus bradycardia possibly linked to LH011 rather than gemcitabine was noted. The MTD was not reached.ConclusionCombining LH011 at doses ranging from 100 to 600 mg with gemcitabine every 21 days demonstrated manageable safety and tolerability. However, tumor response did not significantly differ among the dose groups, suggesting the need for further investigation.Trial RegistrationNCT05329597
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Phase II trial of combined regional hyperthermia and gemcitabine for locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Ishikawa, Takeshi
    Kokura, Satoshi
    Sakamoto, Naoyuki
    Ando, Takashi
    Imamoto, Eiko
    Hattori, Takeshi
    Oyamada, Hirokazu
    Yoshinami, Naomi
    Sakamoto, Masafumi
    Kitagawa, Kazutomo
    Okumura, Yoko
    Yoshida, Naohisa
    Kamada, Kazuhiro
    Katada, Kazuhiro
    Uchiyama, Kazuhiko
    Handa, Osamu
    Takagi, Tomohisa
    Yasuda, Hiroaki
    Sakagami, Junichi
    Konishi, Hideyuki
    Yagi, Nobuaki
    Naito, Yuji
    Yoshikawa, Toshikazu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYPERTHERMIA, 2012, 28 (07) : 597 - 604
  • [2] A phase I trial of erlotinib, gemcitabine and radiation for patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer.
    Kortmansky, JS
    O'Reilly, EM
    Minsky, BD
    Puleio, SA
    Winkelmann, J
    Kelsen, DP
    Schwartz, GK
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 23 (16) : 334S - 334S
  • [3] Phase I trial of oral S-1 combined with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer
    K Nakamura
    T Yamaguchi
    T Ishihara
    A Kobayashi
    H Tadenuma
    K Sudo
    H Kato
    H Saisho
    British Journal of Cancer, 2005, 92 : 2134 - 2139
  • [4] Phase I trial of oral S-1 combined with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Nakamura, K
    Yamaguchi, T
    Ishihara, T
    Kobayashi, A
    Tadenuma, H
    Sudo, K
    Kato, H
    Saisho, H
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2005, 92 (12) : 2134 - 2139
  • [5] A phase III trial of pemetrexed plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in patients with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer
    Oettle, H
    Richards, D
    Ramanathan, RK
    van Laethem, JL
    Peeters, M
    Fuchs, M
    Zimmermann, A
    John, W
    Von Hoff, D
    Arning, M
    Kindler, HL
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2005, 16 (10) : 1639 - 1645
  • [6] Phase I study of a chloroquine–gemcitabine combination in patients with metastatic or unresectable pancreatic cancer
    Panagiotis Samaras
    Marina Tusup
    Thi Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim
    Burkhardt Seifert
    Helga Bachmann
    Roger von Moos
    Alexander Knuth
    Steve Pascolo
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2017, 80 : 1005 - 1012
  • [7] A phase I trial of MTA and gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced or metastatic cancer
    Adjei, AA
    Erlichman, C
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 1999, 26 (02) : 94 - 98
  • [8] Phase I trial of gemcitabine combined with radiation for the treatment of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma
    Wolff, RA
    Evans, DB
    Gravel, DM
    Lenzi, R
    Pisters, PWT
    Lee, JE
    Janjan, NA
    Charnsangavej, C
    Abbruzzese, JL
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2001, 7 (08) : 2246 - 2253
  • [9] Gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and radiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: A phase I trial
    Safran, H
    Dipetrillo, T
    Iannitti, D
    Quirk, D
    Akerman, P
    Cruff, D
    Cioffi, W
    Shah, S
    Ramdin, N
    Rich, T
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (01): : 137 - 141
  • [10] Phase I trial of capecitabine and gemcitabine with radiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Leong, T.
    Michael, M.
    Price, T.
    Ganju, V
    Strickland, A.
    Jefford, M.
    Muller, A.
    Ngan, S.
    Milner, A.
    Zalcberg, J.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2006, 17 : 34 - 34