Investigation of the influence zone of stone columns with and without geogrid encasement by experimental and numerical studies

被引:0
|
作者
Demir, Ahmet [1 ]
Sarici, Talha [2 ]
Ok, Bahadir [3 ]
Ozcan, Mustafa [2 ]
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Civil Engn Dept, TR-01250 Adana, Turkiye
[2] Inonu Univ, Civil Engn Dept, TR-44280 Malatya, Turkiye
[3] Adana Alparslan Turkes Sci & Technol Univ, Civil Engn Dept, TR-01250 Adana, Turkiye
关键词
Stone column; Soil stabilization; Geogrid; Experimental study; Numerical analysis; Influence zone; BEARING CAPACITY; MODEL TESTS; CIRCULAR FOUNDATIONS; SOFT CLAYS; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR; STRIP;
D O I
10.1016/j.aej.2025.03.063
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The influence zone for geogrid encased stone columns (GESC) and ordinary stone columns (OSC) were investigated in the scope of this study. For this purpose, a single stone column (OSC or GESC) was built in clay soil which was placed in tanks had various diameters to observe load-deformation behavior of a 5 cm diameter rigid model footing. The effects of the water content of clay soils on the behavior of stone columns were also investigated. This study consists of two stages. Firstly, experimental studies were conducted at the laboratory using model loading test setup, and secondly, models created with a finite element method (FEM) based software called as Plaxis and numerical analyses were carried. Experimental study results validated the FEM results closely for short-term stability. Therefore, further investigations on FEM models were carried out. As a result of this study, generally, geogrid encasement for the stone columns increased the bearing capacity and the decreased amount of lateral bulging and settlement. In addition, for OSC and GESC, the influence zone was about 5 and 6 times the stone column's diameter, respectively. So, it can be said that encasing the stone column with geogrid reduced the influence zone.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 137
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Behavior of floating stone columns reinforced with geogrid encasement in model tests
    Gu, Meixiang
    Mo, Haizhao
    Qiu, Jianlin
    Yuan, Jie
    Xia, Quan
    FRONTIERS IN MATERIALS, 2022, 9
  • [2] Effects of geogrid encasement on lateral and vertical deformations of stone columns in model tests
    Gu, M.
    Zhao, M.
    Zhang, L.
    Han, J.
    GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 23 (02) : 100 - 112
  • [3] Numerical and Experimental Studies on Single Stone Columns
    Lajevardi, S. H.
    Shamsi, H. R.
    Hamidi, M.
    Enami, S.
    SOIL MECHANICS AND FOUNDATION ENGINEERING, 2018, 55 (05) : 340 - 345
  • [4] Numerical and Experimental Studies on Single Stone Columns
    S. H. Lajevardi
    H. R. Shamsi
    M. Hamidi
    S. Enami
    Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 2018, 55 : 340 - 345
  • [5] Shear Load Tests on Stone Columns With and Without Geosynthetic Encasement
    Murugesan, S.
    Rajagopal, K.
    GEOTECHNICAL TESTING JOURNAL, 2009, 32 (01): : 76 - 85
  • [6] Laboratory and numerical analysis of geogrid encased stone columns
    Xu, Fang
    Moayedi, Hossein
    Foong, Loke Kok
    Moghadam, Mohamad Jamali
    Zangeneh, Milad
    MEASUREMENT, 2021, 169
  • [7] Experimental and numerical investigation of slope stabilization by stone columns
    Mustafa Vekli
    Mustafa Aytekin
    S. Banu İkizler
    Ümit Çalik
    Natural Hazards, 2012, 64 : 797 - 820
  • [8] Experimental and numerical investigation of slope stabilization by stone columns
    Vekli, Mustafa
    Aytekin, Mustafa
    Ikizler, S. Banu
    Calik, Umit
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2012, 64 (01) : 797 - 820
  • [9] Influence of geotextile encasement on the behaviour of stone columns: Laboratory study
    Miranda, Marina
    Da Costa, Almudena
    Castro, Jorge
    Sagaseta, Cesar
    GEOTEXTILES AND GEOMEMBRANES, 2017, 45 (01) : 14 - 22
  • [10] Influence of geosynthetic encasement on the performance of stone columns floating in soft clay
    Dash, Sujit Kumar
    Bora, Mukul Chandra
    CANADIAN GEOTECHNICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 50 (07) : 754 - 765