THE "8 D's" oF HIGH-FLoW NAsAL CANNuLA RIsK: A sCoPING REVIEW

被引:0
|
作者
Johnny, Jace D. [1 ,2 ]
Escobar, Jeana [3 ]
Van Cao, Ray [4 ]
Chow, Martin Cheehong [5 ]
Van Slooten, Henry [6 ]
Drury, Zachary [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Spencer Fox Eccles Sch Med, Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[2] Univ Utah, Coll Nursing, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Utah Hlth, Med Intens Care Unit, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[4] Kaiser Permanente Sch Anesthesia, Pasadena, CA USA
[5] Minneapolis Sch Anesthesia, St Paul, MN USA
[6] Excela Sch Anesthesia, Latrobe, PA USA
[7] Univ Utah, Spencer Fox Eccles Sch Med, Div Nephrol, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
FAILURE;
D O I
10.4037/ajcc2025855
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy is commonly used in acute respiratory failure. Despite this therapy's benefits, it also has risks, with therapy failure and intubation delay cited most frequently. Awareness of these risks is important to ensure optimal patient care and guide future research. Objective To explore risk representation in the literature for acutely ill adult patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula therapy. Methods A scoping review was performed using the Joanna Briggs Institute method of evidence synthesis. An a priori search strategy and protocol were carried out using the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL Complete, and medRxiv databases. After primary screening, data were collected using the REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) tool. Data were prepared, analyzed, and presented using Jupyter Notebook (Python 3.9.7). An online data repository was created to host the associated datasets for future work. Results Primary screening of the 2975 results led to exclusion of 2272 records. After duplicate and redundant articles were removed, articles underwent full-text review, yielding 343 included articles.The most frequently implicated disease in high-flow nasal cannula research was COVID-19 (n = 145), with publication frequency peaking in 2022 (n = 110). All risks fell under 8 categories: deterioration, death, device-related events, delay, disposition, debility, distress, and dysphagia (the "8 D's"). Conclusion Acutely ill patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula therapy encounter 8 categories of risk. Deterioration and death are the most often discussed. Device-related events, delay, disposition, debility, and distress warrant further study.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-Flow Nasal Cannula in Neonates
    El-Farghali, Ola G.
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2017, 62 (05) : 641 - 642
  • [2] A Systematic Review of the High-flow Nasal Cannula for Adult Patients
    Helviz, Yigal
    Einav, Sharon
    CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 22
  • [3] A Systematic Review of the High-flow Nasal Cannula for Adult Patients
    Yigal Helviz
    Sharon Einav
    Critical Care, 22
  • [4] High-Flow Nasal Cannula System Not Just Another Nasal Cannula
    Vella, Michael A.
    Pascual-Lopez, Jose
    Kaplan, Lewis J.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2018, 153 (09) : 854 - 855
  • [5] High-flow nasal cannula therapy in neonates
    Hepping, N.
    Garbe, W.
    Schneider, K.
    PNEUMOLOGE, 2016, 13 (06): : 396 - 399
  • [6] High-flow Nasal Cannula Ventilatory Modalities
    Lobato, Salvador Diaz
    Perales, Jose Manuel Carratala
    Montiel, Guillermo
    Inigo, Jose Miguel Alonso
    ARCHIVOS DE BRONCONEUMOLOGIA, 2024, 60 (02): : 122 - 123
  • [7] High-flow nasal cannula in postextubation management
    Chen, Lu
    Li, Hong-Liang
    Brochard, Laurent
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2016, 8 (09) : E1013 - E1016
  • [8] High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in children: a clinical review
    Kwon, Ji-Won
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL PEDIATRICS, 2020, 63 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [9] High-Flow Nasal Cannula and COVID-19: A Clinical Review
    Crimi, Claudia
    Pierucci, Paola
    Renda, Teresa
    Pisani, Lara
    Carlucci, Annalisa
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2022, 67 (02) : 227 - 240
  • [10] High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen in Adult Patients: A Narrative Review
    Sotello, David
    Rivas, Marcella
    Mulkey, Zachary
    Nugent, Kenneth
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 349 (02): : 179 - 185