Do past ESG scores efficiently predict future ESG performance?

被引:1
|
作者
Taskin, Dilvin [1 ]
Sariyer, Gorkem [2 ]
Acar, Ece [2 ]
Cagli, Efe Caglar [3 ]
机构
[1] Yasar Univ, Fac Business, Dept Int Trade & Finance, Izmir, Turkiye
[2] Yasar Univ, Fac Business, Dept Business Adm, Izmir, Turkiye
[3] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Fac Business, Dept Business Adm, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
ESG score prediction; Machine learning algorithms; Decision tree; Random forest; K -nearest neighbor; Logistic regression; SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FUNDS; FIRM PERFORMANCE; CORPORATE; MARKET; RETURNS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102706
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Given the effects of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores on financial performance and stock returns, the prediction of future ESG scores is highly crucial. ESG scores are calculated using an enormous number of variables related to the sustainability practices of firms; thus, it is impractical for investors to come up with predictions of ESG performance. This paper aims to fill this gap by using only the past score-based and rating-based ESG performance as the determinant of future ESG performance using four machine learning-based algorithms; decision tree (DT), random-forest (RF), k-nearest neighbor (KNN), and logistic regression (LR). The proposed model is validated in BIST sustainability index companies. The results suggest that past ESG grade-based and numerical scores can be used as a determinant of future ESG performance. The results prove that a simple indicator could serve to predict future ESG scores rather than complex data alternatives. Using data from BIST sustainability index companies in Turkey, the findings demonstrate that past ESG grades and scores are reliable predictors of future ESG performance, offering a simple yet effective alternative to complex data-driven methods. This study not only contributes to advancing sustainable finance practices but also provides practical tools for emerging markets like Turkey to align corporate strategies with global sustainability standards. The methodological contributions also have broader relevance for international financial markets.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Do ESG and Diversity Scores Predict Global Firms' Environmental Innovation?
    Saydam, Mehmet Bahri
    Olorunsola, Victor Oluwafemi
    Arici, Hasan Evrim
    Koseoglu, Mehmet Ali
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENT & DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 33 (03): : 410 - 442
  • [2] The role of ESG scores in ESG fund performance and institutional investor selection
    Liang, Jinma
    Zhang, Yicheng
    Li, Yuanheng
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2024, 65
  • [3] ESG investing & firm performance: Retrospections of past & reflections of future
    Narula, Radhika
    Rao, Purnima
    Kumar, Satish
    Paltrinieri, Andrea
    CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2025, 32 (01) : 1096 - 1121
  • [4] Do female CEOs matter for ESG scores?
    Aabo, Tom
    Giorici, Iasmina Cristina
    GLOBAL FINANCE JOURNAL, 2023, 56
  • [5] ESG sentiments and divergent ESG scores: suggesting a framework for ESG rating
    Ajithakumari Vijayappan Nair Biju
    Snehith Jacob Kodiyatt
    P. P. Nithi Krishna
    Geetha Sreelekshmi
    SN Business & Economics, 3 (12):
  • [6] The Impact of ESG Scores on Risk Market Performance
    Aldieri, Luigi
    Amendola, Alessandra
    Candila, Vincenzo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [7] ESG Scores and Performance in Brazilian Public Companies
    Possebon, Edna Aparecida Greggio
    Cippiciani, Felippe Aparecido
    Savoia, Jose Roberto Ferreira
    de Mariz, Frederic
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (13)
  • [8] Do bank-enterprise ESG disparities affect corporate ESG performance?11
    Zou, Jin
    Cheng, Nanli
    Gao, Li
    Gong, Chi
    Lu, Xiaoye
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 72
  • [9] ESG Scores and the Credit Market
    Jang, Ga-Young
    Kang, Hyoung-Goo
    Lee, Ju-Yeong
    Bae, Kyounghun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (08)
  • [10] ESG scores and cost of debt
    Apergis, Nicholas
    Poufinas, Thomas
    Antonopoulos, Alexandros
    ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2022, 112