Which Prognostic Model Best Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Spinal Metastases? A Comparative Analysis of 8 Scoring Systems

被引:0
|
作者
Park, Se-Jun [1 ]
Park, Jin-Sung [1 ]
Kang, Dong-Ho [1 ]
Lee, Chong-Suh [2 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Haeundae Bumin Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Busan, South Korea
关键词
Laboratory marker; Poor prognosis; Prognostic model; Scoring system; Spinal metastasis; Targeted chemotherapy; SURVIVAL PROGNOSIS; TREATMENT STRATEGY; CORD COMPRESSION; CANCER-PATIENTS; LUNG-CANCER; CANDIDATES; SURGERY; DISEASE; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.123
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
<black square> BACKGROUND: Existing scoring system's comparative effectiveness in identifying patients with poor prognosis (i.e., <6 months survival) has not been thoroughly explored. <black square> METHODS: We compared the predictive performance of 8 prognostic scoring systems (Tomita, modified Tokuhashi, modified Bauer, Rades, Oncological Spinal Prognostic Index, Lei, New England Spinal Metastasis Score, and the skeletal oncology research group [SORG] nomogram) with the area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic curves and evaluated the predictive accuracy for 6-month survival across different primary tumor origins, and 1-month survival. Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with 6-month survival. <black square> RESULTS: Six hundred forty one patients with spinal metastasis treated between 1994 and 2022 were included. The SORG nomogram showed best performance with low discriminative power in predicting 6-month survival (AUC [95% confidence interval {CI}]: 0.664 [0.584-0.744]). Logistic regression analysis identified significant factors influencing 6-month survival, including primary cancer type in Lei's classification, preoperative Frankel grades C and D, or grades A and B compared with grade E, preoperative white blood cell, preoperative albumin, and preoperative chemotherapy. For 1-month survival predictions, both the SORG nomogram (AUC [95% CI]: 0.750 [0.648-0.851]) and modified Tokuhashi score (AUC [95% CI]: 0.667 [0.5520.781]) showed significance, albeit with moderate to low discriminative power. <black square> CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that most scoring systems have low discriminative power, with only the SORG nomogram having moderate power for predicting poor prognosis. Recent and future advances in treatment, laboratory markers, and our understanding of tumor biology should be incorporated into prognostic models to improve their accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 566
页数:14
相关论文
共 14 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Scoring Systems and Prognostic Factors in Patients With Spinal Metastases From Lung Cancer
    Tan, Jiong Hao
    Tan, Kimberly-Anne
    Zaw, Aye Sandar
    Thomas, Andrew Cherian
    Hey, Hwee Weng
    Soo, Ross Andrew
    Kumar, Naresh
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (07) : 638 - 644
  • [2] Evaluation of scoring systems and prognostic factors in patients with spinal metastases from nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Kumar, Naresh
    Tan, Jonathan J. H.
    Zaw, Aye S.
    Lim, Joel L.
    Wai, Khin L.
    Malhotra, Rishi
    Loh, Thomas K. S.
    Liu, Gabriel K. P.
    Thambiah, Joseph
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (12): : 2946 - 2953
  • [3] Preoperative Scoring Systems and Prognostic Factors for Patients With Spinal Metastases From Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Chen, Huajiang
    Xiao, Jianru
    Yang, Xinghai
    Zhang, Feng
    Yuan, Wen
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (23) : E1339 - E1346
  • [4] Evaluation of prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases in 196 patients treated during 2005–2010
    M. Dardic
    Christine Wibmer
    A. Berghold
    L. Stadlmueller
    E. V. Froehlich
    A. Leithner
    European Spine Journal, 2015, 24 : 2133 - 2141
  • [5] PROGNOSTIC INDICES FOR BRAIN METASTASES - WHICH BEST REFLECTS A UK COHORT, AND WHAT IS THE PROGNOSIS OF OUR METASTASIS PATIENTS?
    Whitehouse, Kathrin
    Nunn, Adam
    Malcolm, George
    NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2018, 20 : 351 - 351
  • [6] Evaluation of prognostic scoring systems for spinal metastases in 196 patients treated during 2005-2010
    Dardic, M.
    Wibmer, Christine
    Berghold, A.
    Stadlmueller, L.
    Froehlich, E. V.
    Leithner, A.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2015, 24 (10) : 2133 - 2141
  • [7] Evaluation of prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia by different scoring systems: which is the best?
    Breccia, Massimo
    Finsinger, Paola
    Loglisci, Giuseppina
    Colafigli, Gioia
    Serrao, Alessandra
    Salaroli, Adriano
    Petrucci, Luigi
    Alimena, Giuliana
    LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA, 2012, 53 (10) : 2073 - 2074
  • [8] Development of a novel machine-learning prognostic scoring system for patients presenting with spinal metastases utilizing analysis of existing datasets to predict prognosis, morbidity and mortality
    Hadidi, Omar
    Mulqueen, Meghan
    O'Malley, Sandra
    Morris, Seamus
    Lysaght, Joanne
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2024, 54 : 621 - 621
  • [9] Survival Analysis of 254 Patients After Manifestation of Spinal Metastases Evaluation of Seven Preoperative Scoring Systems
    Wibmer, Christine
    Leithner, Andreas
    Hofmann, Guenter
    Clar, Heimo
    Kapitan, Magdalena
    Berghold, Andrea
    Windhager, Reinhard
    SPINE, 2011, 36 (23) : 1977 - 1986
  • [10] Which Scoring System Is the Most Accurate for Assessing Survival Prognosis in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Spinal Metastases from Lung Cancer? A Single-Center Experience
    Tarabay, Bilal
    Gennari, Antoine
    Truong, Van Tri
    Shen, Jesse
    Dib, Rama
    Newmann, Nicholas
    Al-Shakfa, Fidaa
    Yuh, Sung Joo
    Shedid, Daniel
    Boubez, Ghassan
    Wang, Zhi
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 168 : E408 - E417