Uncertainty in determining carbon dioxide removal potential of biochar

被引:0
|
作者
Kane, Seth [1 ]
Bin Thaneya, Ahmad [2 ]
Gursel, Aysegul Petek [2 ]
Fan, Jin [1 ]
Bose, Baishakhi [3 ]
Hendrickson, Thomas P. [4 ]
Nordahl, Sarah L. [4 ]
Scown, Corinne D. [3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
Miller, Sabbie A. [1 ]
Horvath, Arpad [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Biol Syst & Engn Div, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Energy Anal & Environm Impacts Div, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[5] Joint BioEnergy Inst, Emeryville, CA 94608 USA
[6] Univ Calif Berkeley, Energy & Biosci Inst, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS | 2025年 / 20卷 / 01期
关键词
pyrolysis; life-cycle assessment (LCA); Monte Carlo simulation; carbon sequestration; greenhouse gas emissions; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; BIOMASS GASIFICATION; ELECTRICITY-GENERATION; POWER-GENERATION; PYROLYSIS; PLANT;
D O I
10.1088/1748-9326/ad99e9
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A quantitative and systematic assessment of uncertainty in life-cycle assessment is critical to informing sustainable development of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) technologies. Biochar is the most commonly sold form of CDR to date and it can be used in applications ranging from concrete to agricultural soil amendments. Previous analyses of biochar rely on modeled or estimated life-cycle data and suggest a cradle-to-gate range of 0.20-1.3 kg CO2 net removal per kg of biomass feedstock, with the range reported driven by differences in energy consumption, pyrolysis temperature, and feedstock sourcing. Herein, we quantify the distribution of CDR possible for biochar production with a compositional life-cycle inventory model paired with scenario-aware Monte Carlo simulation in a 'best practice' (incorporating lower transportation distances, high pyrolysis temperatures, high energy efficiency, recapture of energy for drying and pyrolysis energy requirements, and co-generation of heat and electricity) and 'poor practice' (higher transportation distances, lower pyrolysis temperatures, low energy efficiency, natural gas for energy requirements, and no energy recovery) scenarios. In the best-practice scenario, cradle-to-gate CDR (which is representative of the upper limit of removal across the entire life cycle) is highly certain, with a median removal of 1.4 kg of CO2e/kg biomass and results in net removal across the entire distribution. In contrast, the poor-practice scenario results in median net emissions of 0.090 kg CO2e/kg biomass. Whether this scenario emits (66% likelihood) or removes (34% likelihood) carbon dioxide is highly uncertain. The emission intensity of energy inputs to the pyrolysis process and whether the bio-oil co-product is used as a chemical feedstock or combusted are critical factors impacting the net carbon dioxide emissions of biochar production, together responsible for 98% of the difference between the best- and poor-practice scenarios.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Scaling biochar solutions for urban carbon dioxide removal
    Zhang, Yuying
    Xu, Weijian
    Zhu, Xiaohong
    Maboudian, Roya
    Ok, Yong Sik
    Tsang, Daniel C. W.
    ONE EARTH, 2024, 7 (09): : 1481 - 1486
  • [2] Dominic Woolf: Studying soil and biochar for carbon dioxide removal
    Stover, Dawn
    Woolf, Dominic
    BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS, 2019, 75 (05) : 229 - 235
  • [3] Geochemical carbon dioxide removal potential of Spain
    Bullock, Liam A.
    Alcalde, Juan
    Tornos, Fernando
    Fernandez-Turiel, Jose -Luis
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 867
  • [4] Biomass residue to carbon dioxide removal: quantifying the global impact of biochar
    Lefebvre, David
    Fawzy, Samer
    Aquije, Camila A.
    Osman, Ahmed I.
    Draper, Kathleen T.
    Trabold, Thomas A.
    BIOCHAR, 2023, 5 (01)
  • [5] Biomass residue to carbon dioxide removal: quantifying the global impact of biochar
    David Lefebvre
    Samer Fawzy
    Camila A. Aquije
    Ahmed I. Osman
    Kathleen T. Draper
    Thomas A. Trabold
    Biochar, 5
  • [6] Do oversimplified durability metrics undervalue biochar carbon dioxide removal?
    Ringsby, A. J.
    Maher, K.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2025, 20 (03):
  • [7] The policy implications of an uncertain carbon dioxide removal potential
    Grant, Neil
    Hawkes, Adam
    Mittal, Shivika
    Gambhir, Ajay
    JOULE, 2021, 5 (10) : 2593 - 2605
  • [8] The global potential for carbon removal through biochar in shifting cultivation systems
    Siren, Anders Henrik
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2024, 29 (07)
  • [9] Mineral-enriched biochar delivers enhanced nutrient recovery and carbon dioxide removal
    Wolfram Buss
    Christian Wurzer
    David A. C. Manning
    Eelco J. Rohling
    Justin Borevitz
    Ondřej Mašek
    Communications Earth & Environment, 3
  • [10] Mineral-enriched biochar delivers enhanced nutrient recovery and carbon dioxide removal
    Buss, Wolfram
    Wurzer, Christian
    Manning, David A. C.
    Rohling, Eelco J.
    Borevitz, Justin
    Masek, Ondrej
    COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 3 (01):