Artificial Intelligence-based Software for Breast Arterial Calcification Detection on Mammograms

被引:0
|
作者
Watanabe, Alyssa T. [1 ,2 ]
Dib, Valerie [3 ]
Wang, Junhao [2 ]
Mantey, Richard [2 ]
Daughton, William [2 ]
Chim, Chi Yung [2 ]
Eckel, Gregory [3 ]
Moss, Caroline [4 ]
Goel, Vinay [5 ,6 ]
Nerlekar, Nitesh [5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] CureMetrix Inc, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Harbor UCLA Med Ctr, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Torrance, CA 90502 USA
[4] Bedford Breast Ctr, Beverly Hills, CA USA
[5] Monash Univ, Victorian Heart Hosp, Victorian Heart Inst, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[6] Monash Univ, Victorian Heart Hosp, Monash Hlth Heart, Clayton, Vic, Australia
[7] Baker Heart & Diabet Inst, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
mammography; breast arterial calcifications; artificial intelligence; computer-aided detection; deep learning; RISK; ASSOCIATION; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1093/jbi/wbae064
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: The performance of a commercially available artificial intelligence (AI)-based software that detects breast arterial calcifications (BACs) on mammograms is presented. Methods: This retrospective study was exempt from IRB approval and adhered to the HIPAA regulations. Breast arterial calcification detection using AI was assessed in 253 patients who underwent 314 digital mammography (DM) examinations and 143 patients who underwent 277 digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) examinations between October 2004 and September 2022. Artificial intelligence performance for binary BAC detection was compared with ground truth (GT) determined by the majority consensus of breast imaging radiologists. Area under the receiver operating curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and BAC prevalence rates of the AI algorithm were compared. Results: The case-level AUCs of AI were 0.96 (0.93-0.98) for DM and 0.95 (0.92-0.98) for DBT. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 87% (79%-93%), 92% (88%-96%), and 91% (87%-94%) for DM and 88% (80%-94%), 90% (84%-94%), and 89% (85%-92%) for DBT. Positive predictive value and NPV were 82% (72%-89%) and 95% (92%-97%) for DM and 84% (76%-90%) and 92% (88%-96%) for DBT, respectively. Results are 95% confidence intervals. Breast arterial calcification prevalence was similar for both AI and GT assessments. Conclusion: Breast AI software for detection of BAC presence on mammograms showed promising performance for both DM and DBT examinations. Artificial intelligence has potential to aid radiologists in detection and reporting of BAC on mammograms, which is a known cardiovascular risk marker specific to women.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Model for Scoring Breast Arterial Calcification on Mammograms
    Nerlekar, Nitesh
    Goel, Vinay
    Yeong, Chee
    Spear, Ella
    Cameron, William
    Mantey, Richard
    Belrose, Nora
    Nicholls, Stephen
    CIRCULATION, 2022, 146
  • [2] Development of an Artificial Intelligence-Based Breast Cancer Detection Model by Combining Mammograms and Medical Health Records
    Trang, Nguyen Thi Hoang
    Long, Khuong Quynh
    An, Pham Le
    Dang, Tran Ngoc
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (03)
  • [3] Artificial Intelligence-Based Breast Cancer Nodal Metastasis Detection
    Liu, Yun
    Kohlberger, Timo
    Norouzi, Mohammad
    Dahl, George E.
    Smith, Jenny L.
    Mohtashamian, Arash
    Olson, Niels
    Peng, Lily H.
    Hipp, Jason D.
    Stumpe, Martin C.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2019, 143 (07) : 859 - 868
  • [4] Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection Software for Automated Breast Ultrasound
    Kwon, Mi-ri
    Youn, Inyoung
    Lee, Mi Yeon
    Lee, Hyun-Ah
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2024, 31 (02) : 480 - 491
  • [5] Effect of artificial intelligence-based triaging of breast cancer screening mammograms on cancer detection and radiologist workload: a retrospective simulation study
    Dembrower, Karin
    Wahlin, Erik
    Liu, Yue
    Salim, Mattie
    Smith, Kevin
    Lindholm, Peter
    Eklund, Martin
    Strand, Fredrik
    LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH, 2020, 2 (09): : E468 - E474
  • [6] Application of artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis on synthetic mammograms from breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammograms
    Lee, Si Eun
    Han, Kyunghwa
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (09) : 6929 - 6937
  • [7] Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection of Smoke Plume
    Jeong, Yemin
    Youn, Youjeong
    Kim, Seoyeon
    Kang, Jonggu
    Choi, Soyeon
    Im, Yungyo
    Seo, Youngmin
    Yu, Jeong-Ah
    Sung, Kyoung-Hee
    Kim, Sang-Min
    Lee, Yangwon
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2023, 39 (02) : 859 - 873
  • [8] Artificial intelligence-based opportunistic screening for the detection of arterial hypertension through ECG signals
    Angelaki, E.
    Barmparis, G.
    Kochiadakis, G.
    Maragkoudakis, S.
    Tsiavos, A.
    Kalomoirakis, P.
    Kampanieris, E.
    Zervakis, S.
    Plevritaki, A.
    Savva, E.
    Kassotakis, S.
    Vardas, P.
    Tsironis, G.
    Marketou, M.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2022, 43 : 2181 - 2181
  • [9] Detection of Arterial Calcification in Mammograms by Random Walks
    Cheng, Jie-Zhi
    Cole, Elodia B.
    Pisano, Etta D.
    Shen, Dinggang
    INFORMATION PROCESSING IN MEDICAL IMAGING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, 5636 : 713 - 724
  • [10] Artificial intelligence-based opportunistic screening for the detection of arterial hypertension through ECG signals
    Angelaki, Eleni
    Barmparis, Georgios D.
    Kochiadakis, George
    Maragkoudakis, Spyros
    Savva, Eirini
    Kampanieris, Emmanuel
    Kassotakis, Spyros
    Kalomoirakis, Petros
    Vardas, Panos
    Tsironis, Giorgos P.
    Marketou, Maria E.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2022, 40 (12) : 2494 - 2501