DEBIASED INVERSE PROPENSITY SCORE WEIGHTING FOR ESTIMATION OF AVERAGE TREATMENT EFFECTS WITH HIGH-DIMENSIONAL CONFOUNDERS

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Yuhao [1 ]
Shah, Rajen d. [2 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Interdisciplinary Informat Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Cambridge, Stat Lab, Cambridge, England
来源
ANNALS OF STATISTICS | 2024年 / 52卷 / 05期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Causal inference; high dimensional statistics; inverse propensity score weighting; de- biased inference; model robustness; GENERALIZED LINEAR-MODELS; CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS; INFERENCE; PARAMETERS; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1214/24-AOS2409
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
We consider estimation of average treatment effects given observational data with high-dimensional pretreatment variables. Existing methods for this problem typically assume some form of sparsity for the regression functions. In this work, we introduce a debiased inverse propensity score weighting (DIPW) scheme for average treatment effect estimation that delivers root nconsistent estimates when the propensity score follows a sparse logistic regression model; the outcome regression functions are permitted to be arbitrarily complex. We further demonstrate how confidence intervals centred on our estimates may be constructed. Our theoretical results quantify the price to pay for permitting the regression functions to be unestimable, which shows up as an inflation of the variance of the estimator compared to the semiparametric efficient variance by a constant factor, under mild conditions. We also show that when outcome regressions can be estimated consistently, our estimator achieves semiparametric efficiency. As our results accommodate arbitrary outcome regression functions, averages of transformed responses under each treatment may also be estimated at the root n rate. Thus, for example, the variances of the potential outcomes may be estimated. We discuss extensions to estimating linear projections of the heterogeneous treatment effect function and explain how propensity score models with more general link functions may be handled within our framework. An R package dipw implementing our methodology is available on CRAN.
引用
收藏
页码:1978 / 2003
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Performance of the high-dimensional propensity score in adjusting for unmeasured confounders
    Jason R Guertin
    Elham Rahme
    Jacques LeLorier
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2016, 72 : 1497 - 1505
  • [2] Performance of the high-dimensional propensity score in adjusting for unmeasured confounders
    Guertin, Jason R.
    Rahme, Elham
    LeLorier, Jacques
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2016, 72 (12) : 1497 - 1505
  • [3] Performance of the High-dimensional Propensity Score in Adjusting for Hidden Measured Confounders
    Guertin, Jason R.
    Rahme, Elham
    LeLorier, Jacques
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2015, 24 : 219 - 219
  • [4] Estimation of Conditional Average Treatment Effects With High-Dimensional Data
    Fan, Qingliang
    Hsu, Yu-Chin
    Lieli, Robert P.
    Zhang, Yichong
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 2022, 40 (01) : 313 - 327
  • [5] Linear high-dimensional mediation models adjusting for confounders using propensity score method
    Luo, Linghao
    Yan, Yuting
    Cui, Yidan
    Yuan, Xin
    Yu, Zhangsheng
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13
  • [6] Robust estimation of causal effects via a high-dimensional covariate balancing propensity score
    Ning, Yang
    Sida, Peng
    Imai, Kosuke
    BIOMETRIKA, 2020, 107 (03) : 533 - 554
  • [7] Propensity score model specification for estimation of average treatment effects
    Waernbaum, Ingeborg
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2010, 140 (07) : 1948 - 1956
  • [8] Covariate Selection in High-Dimensional Propensity Score Analyses of Treatment Effects in Small Samples
    Rassen, Jeremy A.
    Glynn, Robert J.
    Brookhart, M. Alan
    Schneeweiss, Sebastian
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2011, 173 (12) : 1404 - 1413
  • [9] Comparison of Matching on Key Confounders, High-Dimensional Propensity Score (HDPS) and a Combination of Both to Adjust for Confounding
    Xue, Fei
    Ventura, Patrick
    McMullan, Trevor
    Petraro, Paul
    Hennessey, Violeta
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2014, 23 : 196 - 197
  • [10] Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score
    Hirano, K
    Imbens, GW
    Ridder, G
    ECONOMETRICA, 2003, 71 (04) : 1161 - 1189