Biopower with molten carbonate fuel cell carbon dioxide capture: Performance, cost, and grid-integration evaluations

被引:0
|
作者
Luo, Hongxi [1 ]
Cheng, Fangwei [1 ]
Barckholtz, Timothy A. [2 ]
Greig, Chris [1 ]
Larson, Eric D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Princeton Univ, Andlinger Ctr Energy & Environm, Princeton, NJ 08540 USA
[2] ExxonMobil Technol & Engn, Annandale, NJ 08801 USA
关键词
Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage(BECCS); Molten-carbonate fuel cell (MCFC); Techno-economic analysis (TEA); Inflation Reduction Act (IRA); Negative emissions technologies (NETs); Capacity expansion modeling; CO2; CAPTURE; BIOMASS; STORAGE; ELECTRICITY; TECHNOLOGY; EMISSIONS; BIOENERGY; IMPACTS; SYSTEM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2024.119167
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage for power generation (BECCS-power) is a negative emissions technology that could potentially play significant roles in helping achieve climate-change mitigation goals. We evaluate a novel BECCS-power technology utilizing molten carbonate fuel cell-based post-combustion carbon dioxide (CO2) capture (MCFC-CC). We present detailed, internally self-consistent plant-level performance simulation results, techno-economic analyses, and lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions assessment for this technology, with comparisons against conventional monoethanolamine-based post-combustion CO2 capture (MEACC) and biopower without CO2 capture. We additionally carry out grid capacity expansion modeling to 2050 to assess how BECCS-power options might compete with other generators in a case study region (southern region of the Midcontinent Independent System Operator, MISO). This comprehensive work is not only the first rigorous engineering assessments of MCFC for BECCS but also the first techno-economic analyses of MCFC-CC of any type that includes its evaluation in the context of power grid operation. For a biomass input rate of 500 MW thHHV , a MCFC-CC plant generates triple the power and has nearly double the efficiency of a MEA-CC plant (261.5 MWe at 33.5% efficiency vs. 87.2 MWe at 17.4% efficiency). The plants generate comparable levels of negative emissions per tonne of biomass input: 1.3 and 1.5 tCO2, respectively. For a fully-depreciated coal-fired steam-cycle plant repowered for biomass and CO2 capture, the (Nth plant) levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) for MCFC-CC ($113/ MWh) is about half that for MEA-CC owing to a lower estimated unit capital cost ($2,479/kWnet vs. $4,665/ kWnet) and higher efficiency. When 45Q tax credits available under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) are applied, the LCOE of the MCFC-CC is comparable to that of a plant without CO2 capture ($85/MWh). From the capacity expansion modeling, if the southern MISO grid would have a target grid-average carbon emission intensity of 50 kgCO2/MWh or less in 2050, several gigawatts of Bio-MCFC-CC would be economically deployed, and the marginal cost of emissions abatement ($92/tCO2) would be dramatically lower than if it were not a deployment option.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Modeling and characterization of molten carbonate fuel cell for electricity generation and carbon dioxide capture
    Carapellucci, Roberto
    Cipollone, Roberto
    Di Battista, Davide
    ATI 2017 - 72ND CONFERENCE OF THE ITALIAN THERMAL MACHINES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION, 2017, 126 : 477 - 484
  • [2] Carbon capture with molten carbonate fuel cells: Experimental tests and fuel cell performance assessment
    Discepoli, Gabriele
    Cinti, Giovanni
    Desideri, Umberto
    Penchini, Daniele
    Proietti, Stefania
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2012, 9 : 372 - 384
  • [3] Carbon dioxide capture in molten carbonate fuel cell power plants fueled with coal and natural gas
    Reimer, P
    Hirschenhofer, JH
    White, JS
    IECEC-97 - PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRTY-SECOND INTERSOCIETY ENERGY CONVERSION ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-4: VOL.1: AEROSPACE POWER SYSTEMS AND TECHNOL; VOL 2: ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNOL, CONVERSION TECHNOL, THERMAL MANAGEMENT; VOLS 3: ENERGY SYSTEMS, RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES, ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT, POLICY IMPACTS ON ENERGY; VOL 4: POST DEADLINE PAPERS, INDEX, 1997, : 805 - 810
  • [4] Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell performance analysis varying cathode operating conditions for carbon capture applications
    Audasso, Emilio
    Barelli, Linda
    Bidini, Gianni
    Bosio, Barbara
    Discepoli, Gabriele
    JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2017, 348 : 118 - 129
  • [5] Carbon dioxide emission reduction using molten carbonate fuel cell systems
    Wee, Jung-Ho
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 32 : 178 - 191
  • [6] Performance analysis of a direct carbon fuel cell with molten carbonate electrolyte
    Zhang, Houcheng
    Chen, Liwei
    Zhang, Jinjie
    Chen, Jincan
    ENERGY, 2014, 68 : 292 - 300
  • [7] Carbonate Fuel Cell Application for Synergistic Power Generation and Carbon Dioxide Capture
    Ghezel-Ayagh, Hossein
    Farooque, Mohammad
    Patel, Dilip
    Sanderson, Robert
    FUEL CELL SEMINAR 2009, 2010, 26 (01): : 391 - 398
  • [8] Towards enhancement of carbon capture by Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell through controlled thermodiffusion
    Das, Sandipan Kumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2018, 127 : 296 - 302
  • [9] Performance and Durability of the Molten Carbonate Electrolysis Cell and the Reversible Molten Carbonate Fuel Cell
    Hu, Lan
    Lindbergh, Goran
    Lagergren, Carina
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY C, 2016, 120 (25): : 13427 - 13433
  • [10] Combined reforming of methane with carbon dioxide and oxygen in molten carbonate fuel cell reactor
    Tagawa, T
    Ito, M
    Goto, S
    APPLIED ORGANOMETALLIC CHEMISTRY, 2001, 15 (02) : 127 - 134