Efficacy of a thermoplastic mask and pneumatic abdominal compression device for immobilization in stereotactic ablative radiotherapy of spine metastases

被引:0
|
作者
Walter, Yohan A. [1 ]
Speir, Daniel B. [1 ]
Burrell, William E. [1 ]
Wang, Chiachien J. [1 ]
Wu, Hsinshun T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Willis Knighton Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 2600 Kings Hwy, Shreveport, LA 71103 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2024年
关键词
immobilization; motion management; SABR; SBRT; spine metastases; stereotactic ablative radiotherapy; stereotactic body radiation therapy; treatment planning; MARGINS;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14577
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has become a key technique in management of spine metastases. With improved control over treatment plan dosimetry, there is a greater need for accurate patient positioning to guarantee agreement between the treatment plan and delivered dose. With serious potential complications such as fracture and myelopathy, the margins of error in SABR of the spine are minimal. In this study, we assessed the performance of two patient immobilization setups in SABR for spinal metastases. First, a Type-S head and shoulders mask (CQ Medical, Avondale, PA), and second, the BPL1 setup, which includes a wing board, vacuum bag, and the Respiratory Belt for the Body Pro-Lok ONE (CQ Medical, Avondale, PA). Immobilization was assessed using image-guided intrafraction repositioning shifts. Required planning target volume (PTV) margins were calculated based on repositioning data for 172 treated fractions using 2 standard deviation (2SD) and analytic approaches. Overall, 91.7% and 74.1% of fractions treated had total 3D repositioning shifts <= 3.0 mm using the Type-S and BPL1 setups, respectively. In the thoracic spine, 43.2% and 46.5% of fractions had shifts <= 1.5 mm for the respective setups. Suggested margins were under 3.5 mm in all directions and use cases. In the posterior-anterior direction, the BPL1 setup had a 0.6 mm smaller suggested margin for the thoracic spine compared to the Type-S setup, at 1.4 mm, calculated using the analytic approach. Both the Type-S and BPL1 setups are effective for immobilization in spine SABR. The Type-S demonstrated superior immobilization in the upper spine and remains the clinical standard for cervical and upper thoracic spine positioning. The BPL1 setup showed effective immobilization in use cases treating the mid-to lower thoracic spine and lumbar spine and remains our clinical standard for those use cases. Results additionally demonstrate feasibility of potential PTV margin reduction.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Positional uncertainties of cervical and upper thoracic spine in stereotactic body radiotherapy with thermoplastic mask immobilization
    Jeon, Seung Hyuck
    Kim, Jin Ho
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 36 (02): : 122 - 128
  • [2] The efficacy of thermoplastic masks for head immobilization in stereotactic radiosurgery/radiotherapy and intensity modulated radiotherapy
    Rodebaugh, R
    Crownover, R
    Weinhous, M
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (06) : 1253 - 1254
  • [3] Stereotactic ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) for Adrenal Metastases: high Efficacy with low Toxicity
    Koos, V
    Kretschmer, M.
    Dahle, J.
    Sabatino, M.
    Feine, D.
    Wuerschmidt, F.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2017, 193 : S43 - S44
  • [4] Effect of Immobilization/support Devices and Air Gap On Skin Doses for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy with Abdominal Compression Device
    Peng, Y.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3610 - 3610
  • [5] Comparison of Patient Immobilization with and without abdominal Compression in stereotactic Radiotherapy of Liver Tumors
    Dreher, C.
    Mayinger, M.
    Dapper, H.
    Beierl, S.
    Oechsner, M.
    M-N, Duma
    Combs, S. E.
    Habermehl, D.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2017, 193 : S35 - S35
  • [6] Clinical efficacy of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for lung metastases arising from colorectal cancer
    Jung, Jinhong
    Song, Si Yeol
    Kim, Jong Hoon
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    Kim, Tae Won
    Jeong, Seong-Yun
    Kim, Su Ssan
    Choi, Eun Kyung
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2015, 10
  • [7] Clinical efficacy of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for lung metastases arising from colorectal cancer
    Jinhong Jung
    Si Yeol Song
    Jong Hoon Kim
    Chang Sik Yu
    Jin Cheon Kim
    Tae Won Kim
    Seong-Yun Jeong
    Su Ssan Kim
    Eun Kyung Choi
    Radiation Oncology, 10
  • [8] Evaluation of kidney motion with and without a pneumatic abdominal compression belt: Considerations for stereotactic radiotherapy
    West, Kimberley
    Russo, Majella
    Brown, Elizabeth
    Barry, Tamara
    Hargrave, Cathy
    Pryor, David
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 62 (01) : 128 - 132
  • [9] Local control and vertebral compression fractures following stereotactic body radiotherapy for spine metastases
    Ozdemir, Yurday
    Torun, Nese
    Guler, Ozan Cem
    Yildirim, Berna Akkus
    Besen, Ali A.
    Yetisken, Aylin Gunesli
    Onal, H. Cem
    Topkan, Erkan
    JOURNAL OF BONE ONCOLOGY, 2019, 15
  • [10] Vertebral compression fracture rate following stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for spine oligometastases: a UK experience
    Hussain, Sameed
    Zarkar, Anjali
    Elmodir, Ahmed
    Ford, Daniel
    Yahya, Sundus
    Heyes, Geoff
    Jackson, Timothy
    Stange, Ruth
    Augustus, Hannah
    Sherriff, Jenny
    JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE, 2022, 21 (04) : 476 - 480